![]() | No ratings.
Would Alice is still Alice after Wonderland? |
I. Without Alice Alice, after reading Wonderland, is a spectacular character that astonished my sense and tickled my humour. However, behind the laughter hides a Cheshire Cat that lurks above you— that observes you, or our, consciousness. To tend before our entire introduction, is it possible to grasp of such Wonderland without ever arriving nor knowing its existence? The empirical ability— as we mention of 'empirical' as observable and repeatable— yet, we know that this Wonderland truly exist in this reality. To name a few: consciousness, logic, mathematics, language, natural minerals, trees, variation of life forms, and so on. This does not appear "common" as we cannot grasp its existence solely by its own: it requires various and deep explanations only to arrive at its core. Wonderland, is it? Truly, a remark of Wonderland is this reality, world, planet, universe, and cosmic itself. A reader neglects the absurdity or the nonsensical sense of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, to which prevents that reader to read what should be read. However, it dawned in my intuition, there is no such thing as "nonsense" for we decide what is "nonsense" and what is "sense." Per se, it is nonsense to me how various languages are formed, yet it made sense to me that I use a few language: in forms, a nonsense, therefore, is an avoided inquiry to such matter that appeals deeper to the conscience than of superficial; in forms, a sense is easily applicable to conscience than nonsense for it does not require such philosophizing of matters and/or generally deeper inquiries. For instance, the Newtonian Mechanics would not make sense to a pauper, neither the life of a pauper scrambling through garbages to search for a dime to survive in comparison to a life of endeavor and pursuit of physics of physicists. Nonsense and sense, on its own accord, are arbitrary that utterly depends on the usage of it; thus, I assert that there is no "common sense" for it is not common to have a general sense for it must be included that all people should follow under the one same line and not cause any forms of deviation. In this case, a common sense is an agreement of all, but this is impossible to achieve for there will be, and always be, a sort of unknown deviation. However, I do not yet conclude that common sense is truly impossible, a regime of totalitarianism where one ideology is followed can be deemed as "common sense"— any deviation of opinions are therefore executed, much likewise what the Queen of Hearts does to her people of beheading. Then, Wonderland is truly a reflection of the real world, and that the assertion and association on matters of what is deemed as "absurd" or nonsensical is a barrier to realistic understanding of matters that requires a rigorous inquiries. The Queen of Hearts says so, it is then "common" to have creatures that speaks English and dressed in some forms of manner. The Queen of Hearts says so, it is "common" to have a cat floating around and vanishing whenever it likes. |