I provide my own pros and cons of lonliness, but support the pros |
Being alone i said to be best. To be independent is to be a position of enabling. To have solitude is to have more time for development. To have no one is to be credited fo your actions. All of these expressions are meant to glorifybeing alone. I accentuate no belief of these notions. I believe the opposite, How is being alone best or virtous, if there is no one to which I can express myself? How is independence enabling if I've no one to provide motivation.? How is solitude best for development if it is with another that I grow best? Finally, what worth is self-acquired credit with no one to share it with? So, what say you glorifiers of loneliness? How can one deify such a terrible feeling? To be alone is to be a lone soul. And that soul has no other to motivate it nor enable to develop. Thus it has no will to go on. And what of love? A soul must have love as part of it and love of self has it's limitations. A lonely soul cannot have love if it is alone. So tell me, what of your logic now? To say being alone is good. How do they measure against my sentiments,which are mere opinion. They crumble. They crumble because I focus on the spiritual. While you accentuate the earthly. Even if your words reign true in society they will crumble before me. These confessions of loneliness are my own. And I say that to have no one is denial of your soul's potential. |