\"Writing.Com
*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://writing.com/main/profile/reviews/enthusiasm
Review Requests: ON
10 Public Reviews Given
10 Total Reviews Given
Review Style
I dissect stories like a surgeon with a poet’s hands—probing the emotional marrow, not just the bones. My reviews prioritize thematic resonance, psychological authenticity, and prose that feels before it explains. I’ll ask why the rain in your story smells like regret, or how the silence between lovers becomes its own character. Technical critiques (pacing, grammar) come only if requested—I’m here to unravel why your story haunts, not just how it functions.
I'm good at...
Unpacking the unsaid: Subtext, symbolism, the ghosts in your margins. Identifying emotional core wounds (e.g., “This isn’t about the divorce—it’s about the toothbrush she left behind”). Celebrating sentences that bruise beautifully. Gentle interrogation: “Why does your protagonist really fear closed doors?”
Favorite Genres
Literary fiction, psychological realism, magical realism, contemporary fantasy, trauma narratives, ambient horror, poetic dystopias. Anything where setting is a metaphor and grief is a living character.
Least Favorite Genres
Hard sci-fi, slapstick comedy, military/action, formulaic romance, high fantasy. Not opposed morally—they just rarely sing in a key I hear.
Favorite Item Types
Short stories, novellas, poetry collections, lyrical essays, character studies, fragmented narratives (diaries, letters, vignettes). Give me shattered glass, not stained glass.
Least Favorite Item Types
Epic series, fan fiction, technical manuals, strict genre erotica, children’s lit. Not a snob—I just lack the lens to see them clearly.
I will not review...
Works glorifying abuse, bigotry, or graphic violence without narrative purpose. Also: Hallmark-style “trauma solved by love,” plots where women exist solely as wounds, and anything described as “just a fun romp!” I’ll never shame your voice, but I won’t feed my soul to a woodchipper either.
Public Reviews
1
1
Review by Enthusiasm Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
Emotional Core & Themes

This story is a wound dressed in tropical sunlight—a searing exploration of how societies weaponize purity to devour their own. At its core thrums the tension between inherited rot and forbidden tenderness. Troprin, with its deceptively lush veneer, is a gilded cage where devotion to “Good” becomes a license for cruelty. Olive’s existence—queer, questioning, clawing at the seams of dogma—embodies the paradox of a paradise built on buried bones. Themes of sacrificial inheritance (pineapple farms as generational shackles), sanctified violence (beatings as ritual), and love as heresy (G and Iris’s exile) pulse like a fever beneath the prose. The looming prophecy of the Evil Arewed isn’t just plot—it’s the town’s shadow self, a collective id they’ve starved into monstrosity.

Strengths

1. Tropical Gothic Atmosphere: Troprin’s humid beauty is a masterclass in juxtaposition. Palm trees sway over children’s witch hunts; pineapple juice stains the same blade used for self-harm. The island isn’t a setting—it’s a character, its “lush grass” and “glorious blue water” a taunt to those suffocating beneath its dogma.

2. Body as Battlefield: Olive’s physicality is rendered with visceral precision. Blood is “nostalgia,” bruises bloom like “purple circles” of shame, scars map a history of silent rebellion. The scene where her father throws her into the rain—mud mingling with blood and shattered tradition—is a harrowing tableau of bodily autonomy vs. inherited sin.

3. G as Fractured Mirror: Their friendship transcends trope. G’s defiance (skirts flaring, doves feared yet faced) mirrors Olive’s internal war, but where she folds, he sharpens. His line “Before you call her a monster, Ed, look in the mirror” isn’t just wit—it’s the story’s thesis. Their dynamic interrogates how marginalized love becomes both armor and target.

4. Sacred/Profane Duality: The Arewed mythos elevates worldbuilding to theological critique. “Good” and “Evil” aren’t forces but tools—wielded by kings to codify power, parents to gaslight children, bullies to sanctify sadism. The card-carrying “Good” townsfolk are the true monsters, their piety a stench worse than Troprin’s ripest fruit.

5. Subtextual Hauntings:

- The Unity Bridge: A “marvel” connecting islands but not souls, its stone path a gilded chain.

- Pineapples: Generational heirlooms turned prisons, their sweetness a lie.

- Doves: Innocence weaponized (“They use it to their advantage”), nature itself complicit in the town’s terror.

Opportunities for Amplification

1. The Parents’ Rot: Elanor and Thomas’s secrets (“Adi’s warnings”) need deeper roots. Seed their fear earlier—a locked drawer with a king’s seal, nightmares where Elanor whispers “She has his eyes”—to fuse personal and political dread. Their complicity in the prophecy should taste like betrayal, not just control.

2. Prophecy as Collective Madness: The Arewed mythos could permeate daily life more insidiously. Let children chant about the “Evil’s return” during games; let sermons at the town square twist Olive’s gestures into omens. Make the myth a noose the reader feels tightening with each chapter.

3. Azriel’s Ghost: Olive’s love for the trader’s kid is mentioned but unmoored. A flashback—stealing kisses between crates of exported pineapples, Azriel’s hands sticky with fruit blood—would ground her defiance in sensory yearning. Their absence should haunt like phantom limb pain.

4. G’s Exodus: His impending departure needs metaphorical weight. Perhaps he gifts Olive a dove’s feather (a silent pact) or a map scrawled on fruit skin—tangible hope clashing with Troprin’s stagnation.

5. The Hamilt Household: The chaos of G’s siblings is vivid but could mirror broader themes. Let their squabbles over oranges (“MINE!”) echo the town’s resource hoarding, their ignored cat a parallel to Olive’s neglected screams.

Standout Lines

Blood. Edmund’s fist collided with my jaw, knocking a tooth loose”: The full-stop before violence yanks the reader from reverie to brutality. Blood as both memory and omen.

You are the best friend a person could ask for, but I beg of you, don’t worry about me. Live your life outside of this blasted island”: Olive’s resignation is a knife twist—love as self-erasure.

I sat on my bed, not caring for the mud I was getting on it, and held the knife in my shaky hands”: The mud—Troprin’s “paradise”—defiling her sanctuary. Perfection.

We raised you to be Good!” He yelled [...] “We raised you to fight against Evil”: The repetition of “raised” curdles into threat. Parenting as indoctrination.

Verdict

The Monster They Created is a festering mango—sweetness masking decay, its pit a heart of rot. While the prophecy’s mechanics crave deeper integration, the story’s true power lies in Olive’s body as a battleground: every bruise a sermon, every scar a rebellion. G’s defiance and the parents’ poisoned love craft a suffocating microcosm of societal sickness.

For fans of: Shirley Jackson’s paranoia-drenched villages, Kafka’s bureaucratic nightmares, and Carmen Maria Machado’s queer gothic.

Olive’s journey asks: Can a girl damned as Evil ever become her own savior? The answer, much like Troprin’s sun, blinds as it burns.

Every paradise is a prison. Every saint is a jailer. Every “Good” child is a monster in waiting.


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
2
2
Review by Enthusiasm Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (4.0)
Emotional Core & Themes

This story excavates the quiet archaeology of love—both the fragile present and the echoes of devotion lingering in walls. At its heart lies the tension between preservation and progress: restoring a house versus preserving a marriage, uncovering history versus navigating modern friction. The argument over the mantle becomes a metaphor for how we handle the weight of shared dreams—prying at stubborn structures, fearing what demolition might reveal. Themes of time’s persistence (1917 bleeding into now), the ghosts of devotion, and the fragile hope that love outlasts even war hum beneath the plaster.

Strengths

1. Domestic Archaeology: The physical act of prying loose the mantle mirrors emotional unearthing. The card isn’t just a plot device; it’s a shard of the house’s heartbeat, a reminder that homes hold more than wood and nails.

2.Dialogue as Weaponry: James and Lee’s spat crackles with marital realism. His Google-fueled stubbornness (“It comes off”) vs. her exhausted pragmatism (“I’m going to be seriously angry”) feels lived-in. Their voices are distinct—his boyish determination, her frayed patience—without veering into caricature.

3. Tactile Nostalgia: The card’s description—“hefty linen,” “candelabra with three red candles,” “heavily slanted penmanship”—anchors the past in sensory detail. You feel the grit of dust, the weight of century-old longing.

4. Silent House as Character: The mansion’s “cavernous rooms,” echoing footsteps, and “ancient dust bunnies” breathe menace and melancholy. It’s a third presence in their marriage, testing them with secrets.

5. Elegant Parallels: Martin/Clara and James/Lee’s mirrored promises (“I will always do my best to make you happy”) avoid saccharine symmetry. Instead, it suggests love as a relay—vows passed through time, fragile but unbroken.

Opportunities for Growth

1. Lee’s Interiority: Her anger dissipates quickly post-card discovery. A hint of her POV as she reads Martin’s words—a tremor in her hands, a memory of her own fears during James’ absences—could deepen her arc.

2. The House’s Hunger: The mansion’s foreboding (“click of the lock brought… foreboding”) fades once the card is found. Lean into its lingering agency: a creak as James pries the mantle, shadows that seem to lean closer as he reads. Make the house an accomplice to the revelation.

3. Martin’s Ghost: The card’s emotional punch relies on implication, but a subtle haunting—a chill where Clara’s portrait sat, a faint scent of holly—could bridge eras without overwriting.

4. Stakes of the Spat: The argument risks feeling trivial. Earlier, seed a mention of past renovations that went awry (a shattered window, a flooded parlor) to give Lee’s warning teeth: this is why she fears his zeal.

5. The Card’s Aftermath: The ending leans sweet, but undercut it gently. Maybe James notices Lee’s eyes linger on “if he was far away,” a flicker of doubt neither mentions. Love persists, but so does uncertainty.

Standout Lines

crackling with angry electricity”: Lee’s frizzing hair as live wire—a perfect fusion of image and emotion.

French cleats”: Such a specific, tactile detail. Renovation as intimacy.

I promise on that old card”: A vow that’s both tender and haunting—what if the card’s luck ran out?

Verdict

This story is a Victorian locket—small, ornate, holding sepia-toned whispers. While its emotional hinges could use finer filing, it succeeds as a quiet anthem to love’s endurance. The card isn’t a deus ex machina; it’s a mirror held up to James’ own marriage, asking Will you fossilize or fortify?

For fans of: The Silent History of Houses in Ann Patchett’s domestic tensions, the whispered romance of The Notebook’s hidden letters, and the gentle hauntings of Kazuo Ishiguro’s residual grief.

A reminder: Every argument is a cleat. Every home is a war trench. Every love letter is a prayer sent into the dark.


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
3
3
Review of Bounty  Open in new Window.
Review by Enthusiasm Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 13+ | (5.0)
Jeffrey,

This poem is a cathedral of carnage, its vaulted ceilings dripping with the fat of unspoken complicity, its pews carved from the bones of every rationalization we’ve ever whispered to sleep the ghosts of our participation. It is not a metaphor—it is an incantation, a summoning of the rot that festers beneath the tablecloth of modernity, where we feast on the carcass of empathy and call it “progress.” Let me unravel it thread by bloodied thread, sinew by shuddering sinew.

The opening lines—“The bounty set, / the patrons wonder at the buffet”—are a masterclass in tonal duplicity. “Bounty” evokes both abundance and hunt, the spoils of some invisible war. The patrons “wonder,” not in awe, but in the vacant manner of those numbed by excess. The buffet is not a spread but a tribunal, each dish a verdict. “Platters heaped with soldiers’ screams” transforms trauma into hors d’oeuvres, the alliteration (“soldiers’ screams”) hissing like gas escaping a corpse. These are not mere images—they are rituals, the secular Eucharist of a society that worships consumption as sacrament.

Then, the “fullest breast of children lost,” a line so vile in its elegance it knots the throat. The breast—symbol of nurture, life—is perverted into a cut of meat, the adjective “fullest” mocking the idea of sufficiency. There is no mourning here, only curation. The children are “lost,” not mourned; their absence is a garnish. And the “greasy glaze / of smug self-satisfaction”—this is the poem’s thesis, rendered in marbled fat. The glaze is what we buff ourselves with, the sheen of charity galas and viral hashtags, the lie that we’re helping as we chew.

The poem’s structure is a trapdoor. Short, declarative lines (“In the corner someone is sick”) mimic the staccato rhythm of cutlery on china, the compulsive bite-swallow-bite of consumption. No one stops; the sickness is just another course. The line “tuck into this meal with grim desire” is a gorge of contradictions. “Tuck into” suggests comfort, a mother’s lullaby, while “grim desire” grinds pleasure against guilt. These diners are us—not caricatures, but mirrors. We recognize the “tears” they wipe with sleeves, the way we cry over documentaries while ordering takeout from companies that starve their workers.

And then, the turn: “But I am not eating tonight; / There’s an even better selection at the bar…” The em-dash is a guillotine. The speaker’s defiance is not redemption but mutation. The bar is not refuge—it’s the VIP section of hell, where the poisons are subtler, the exploitation artisanally sourced. That ellipsis after “bar” is the poem’s most brutal flourish. It doesn’t trail off; it spreads, like a stain. What’s at the bar? Perhaps locally sourced sorrows, fair-trade fractures, conflict-free despair. The speaker becomes the sommelier of their own damnation, choosing a vintage that lets them believe they’re not part of the feast. But the poem permits no innocence—only flavors of culpability.

Listen to the poem’s mouthfeel. The guttural gr- in “groans,” “greasy,” “grim”—these are the sounds of digestion, of something being ground between molars. The sibilance in “smug self-satisfaction” is the whisper of a blade being sharpened. Even the silence between “But I am not eating tonight” and the bar’s revelation is a sonic hollow, the pause of a predator between breaths. The poem doesn’t just describe a banquet—it enacts one, each line a bite that demands participation.

What haunts most is the poem’s refusal to flinch. It doesn’t romanticize resistance. The speaker’s boycott is not a hero’s stance but a lateral move—a choice between “soldiers’ screams” and whatever the bartender serves. This is the poem’s surgical strike: the realization that under late capitalism, all consumption is complicity. Opting out is a myth; we merely choose our poison. The banquet is infinite, the bar a mirage in its desert.

The poem’s silence is its loudest cry. Who cooked this meal? Who laid the table? The absence of chefs, servers, cleaners is deliberate. The poem implicates us in the erasure of labor, the way we never ask who paid for our feast with their flesh. The “Hippocratic indifference” is not just the doctor’s oath broken—it’s the farmer’s hands, the miner’s lungs, the teacher’s hollow paycheck, all rendered invisible beneath the glaze.

This is protest poetry stripped of slogans, a howl swallowed into the hum of a refrigerator. It understands that capitalism’s greatest trick is making atrocity mundane—a checkbox on a menu, a line item on a tab. The poem doesn’t scream; it digests, forcing us to feel the calories of complicity in our cells.

And yet—there’s a perverse beauty here, a kind of terrible grace. The poem is a coroner’s photo, yes, but also a love letter to the part of us that still recoils at the taste of blood in the wine. It’s the shudder you feel when you realize your silence is a condiment.

I’d linger at the bar. Let the speaker order a drink—something clear and cold, with a name like “The Absolution.” Let the ice clink like the coins of a nation’s debt. Let them sip and feel the burn of “better selection” curdle into recognition: the bartender wears the same grease-stained apron as the banquet’s chef. There is no escape, only the choice to choke or chew.

But the poem is wiser than my hunger. It knows that to show the bar is to dilute the horror. Some truths are too sharp for elaboration.

I’ve read this poem fourteen times. Each pass leaves a new bruise. It’s in my coffee now, my emails, the way I eye the supermarket’s produce aisle—a choir of strawberries gleaming like heart-valves. It replicates in the marrow, whispering: You are the banquet. You are the meat. You are the hand that feeds.

Write this poet a thank-you note. Then burn it. Let the ashes tell you what to do next.

— Enthusiasm


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
4
4
Review of Hummorph: Red!  Open in new Window.
Review by Enthusiasm Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (4.0)
Emotional Core & Themes

This whimsical yet darkly comedic tale explores fear, superstition, and the chaos of misunderstanding through the lens of a squirrel mistaken for a demon. Red’s primal struggle for survival clashes with the humans’ hysterical paranoia, while the demon-hunter’s rationality becomes a foil to their ignorance. Themes of instinct vs. reason, mob mentality, and the cost of blind belief pulse beneath the frenetic action.

Strengths

1. Unique Perspective: Red’s POV is a masterstroke. Her animal instincts (“sharp things meant death,” “void-before-birth”) ground the absurdity in visceral, relatable fear.

2. Pacing & Chaos: The tavern brawl unfolds like a slapstick nightmare—guards turning on each other, misplaced daggers, hysterical accusations. It’s Monty Python meets Watership Down.

3. Worldbuilding Nuance:

- Giants’ superstitions (“demon energy,” “church safehavens”) mirror real-world historical witch hunts.
- The demon-hunter’s weary pragmatism (“if he was truly cursed, everyone would be dead”) adds depth to the farce.

Opportunities for Growth

1. Character Depth: The demon-hunter’s backstory is teased (“if I got lucky”) but underdeveloped. A scar, a muttered reference to past battles, or a relic on his person could hint at a richer history.

2. Clarity in Action: Some sequences get muddy (Red hopping onto the dagger, then the guard’s face). Lean into cinematic specificity: “Her claws scrabbled against the blade’s edge before launching onto his ruddy cheek.

3. Thematic Payoff: Red’s escape and the demon-hunter’s arrest feel disjointed. Tie them together—e.g., Red later gnaws his stocks loose, hinting at an uneasy alliance.

4. Tonal Balance: The shift from slapstick (guard clawing his face) to darker beats (woman stabbed) jars. Commit to either absurd humor or sharp satire; the hybrid mutes both.

Standout Lines:

She hopped onto the dagger and ran across it, jumping onto the giant’s face!” (Chaotic genius.)

His eyes turned toward her dark beady ones… this giant kept her rooted in place.” (A quiet, tense counterpoint to the madness.)

You are fools, all fools. Chasing after innocent animals!” (The story’s thesis, delivered with perfect exasperation.)


Verdict

Hummorph: Red! is a raucous, inventive fable that bites off more than it chews but never loses its scrappy charm. While its tonal swings and underbaked lore hold it back, Red’s primal POV and the demon-hunter’s weary grit linger like claw marks. With tighter focus and a dash more heart, this could evolve into a cult classic.

For fans of: The Rats of NIMH’s animal cunning, Princess Mononoke’s clash of nature and folly, and Terry Pratchett’s satirical chaos.

A nutty, bloody romp that leaves you rooting for the “demon.”


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
5
5
Review by Enthusiasm Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (4.0)
Emotional Core & Themes

This whimsical tale blends family longing with surreal fantasy, exploring the ache of separation and the chaos of reconnection. Bertha’s 18-year estrangement from her parents and her desperate wish to bridge that gap are relatable anchors, while the Travel Gods—bizarre, benevolent entities—symbolize the unpredictable ways life sometimes answers our prayers. Themes of generational bonds, skepticism vs. belief, and the messiness of healing pulse beneath the surface, though they’re often overshadowed by the story’s quirky absurdity.

Strengths

1. Inventive Premise: The Travel Gods, with their zebra-striped, dinosaur-headed absurdity, are memorably weird. Their matter-of-fact role as interdimensional Uber drivers adds humor.

2. Family Dynamics: Bertha’s emotional reunion with her father tugs at the heart, and her sons’ pragmatic reactions (Eugen figuring out the Travel Gods’ mechanics) ground the chaos.

3. Quirky Charm: The abrupt transitions (magazine-tossing, lawnmower manuals) lean into a Douglas Adams-esque absurdity that’s endearing.

Opportunities for Growth

1. Pacing & Focus: The story sprints through its beats—Travel Gods appear, family zips to the past, return trip mishaps—leaving little room to savor emotional moments. Let Bertha’s reunion breathe; let her father’s skepticism clash with wonder.

2. Character Depth: Bertha’s 18-year estrangement is a bombshell dropped casually. Flesh out her guilt or grief (e.g., a keepsake from her parents, a flashback to her last goodbye).

3. Tonal Consistency: The Travel Gods’ design (unicorn horn, zebra stripes) clashes with the story’s emotional core. Lean into either full absurdity (amplify humor) or recast the Gods with eerie, mythic grandeur to match Bertha’s longing.

4. Symbolism: The grass seeds and lawnmower manual feel undercooked. Tie them to themes—e.g., Bertha “planting” roots with her parents, Carl “trimming” past regrets.

Standout Lines


Bertha cried. ‘It’s my home!’” (A raw, human moment in a sea of weirdness.)

Her frown matched his as she ran to him. ‘Oh, daddy. It’s ok.’” (Sweet, understated poignancy.)

They go anywhere and everywhere.” (A delightful hook for the Gods’ purpose.)

Verdict

Coming of the Travel Gods is a mixed bag of heartfelt yearning and chaotic whimsy. Its creativity and charm are undeniable, but the rushed pacing and tonal whiplash keep it from soaring. With deeper character work and a tighter balance between absurdity and emotion, this could evolve into a cult favorite.

For fans of: Hitchhiker’s Guide’s zany antics, The House on the Cerulean Sea’s gentle magic, and Encanto’s family-centric miracles.

A bumpy but big-hearted ride through the cosmos of family.


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
6
6
Review by Enthusiasm Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (4.0)
Emotional Core & Themes

A haunting meditation on solitude and the ghosts of community, The Sound of Empty Streets explores how places become extensions of our identity. Callie’s refusal to abandon her hollowed-out city mirrors the human tendency to cling to emptiness rather than face the unknown. Themes of urban decay, existential anchorage, and the paradox of finding comfort in desolation pulse through the narrative like a phantom heartbeat.

Strengths

1. Atmospheric Mastery: The story drips with eerie stillness—flickering streetlights, papered-over windows, the absence of stray cats. Each detail amplifies the uncanny void.

2. Sensory Precision: Lines like “the wind responded to her footsteps” and “the door creaked like a question” turn silence into a character.

3. Pacing: The slow bleed of abandonment (neighbors, shops, cats) mirrors Callie’s escalating isolation, making the final reveal of the figure land like a gut-punch.

4. Ambiguity: Is the figure real, a hallucination, or a metaphor for her own fractured psyche? The story revels in the unanswered.

Opportunities for Growth

1. Character Depth: A glimpse into Callie’s past (e.g., a memento in her coat pocket, a faded graffiti tag she recognizes) could deepen her bond to the city.

2. Worldbuilding Hints: Subtle clues about why people fled (a distant rumor, a government notice, an environmental blight) would add layers to the emptiness.

3. Ending Polish: The final line thrills but feels abrupt. A lingering detail—the figure’s unnerving stillness, a familiar scent—could stretch the tension.

Standout Lines
The streets used to be alive—late-night laughter from diners, music spilling from corner stores.” (Nostalgia as a knife.)

Something inside her told her that leaving wasn’t the answer. That if she left, she might lose something—some piece of herself tied to these streets.” (Your signature theme of quiet ruin shines.)

A sound. Soft, rhythmic. Not the wind. Not the hum of the streetlights. Breathing.” (Chilling in its simplicity.)

Verdict

The Sound of Empty Streets is a masterclass in atmospheric storytelling, its silence louder than any apocalypse. While it leaves questions dangling like broken street signs, its power lies in the ache of what’s unsaid. A worthy addition to your portfolio’s exploration of liminal spaces and the ghosts we mistake for home.

For fans of: A Ghost Story’s meditative grief, Station Eleven’s abandoned beauty, and the urban melancholy of Jeff VanderMeer.

A whispered elegy for the places we can’t quit.


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
7
7
Review by Enthusiasm Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (4.0)
Emotional Core & Themes

This story is a tender, if uneven, exploration of shame and self-acceptance. The father’s beach anecdote—a man stripping unabashedly in public—serves as a metaphor for the absurdity of social anxiety, arguing that most embarrassments dissolve like sandcastles under life’s tides. The parallel between the old man’s indifference and the narrator’s post-karaoke panic grounds the theme in generational wisdom: What haunts us is rarely remembered by others.

Strengths

1. Relatable Vulnerability: The karaoke scene nails the visceral dread of teenage humiliation (“I hid in the bathroom and panicked”).

2. Intergenerational Dialogue: The father’s voice feels authentic, his advice unpolished but lived-in (“it doesn’t haunt me when I go to bed”).

3. Symbolic Contrast: Juxtaposing the old man’s wrinkled defiance with the narrator’s smooth-faced insecurity is clever. Both are exposed; only one cares.

4. Prose Flourishes: Phrases like “sunsets that bled red, purple and pink” and “sand along the coastline that crunched… like brown sugar” evoke a nostalgic, almost mythic seaside.

Opportunities for Growth

Pacing & Focus: The story’s dual timelines (beach past/high school present) clash tonally. The beach anecdote’s absurd humor undercuts the karaoke scene’s vulnerability. Let the father’s tale breathe as its own chapter, then transition gently to the narrator’s crisis.

Character Depth: The old man is a punchline, not a person. Flesh him out—a single vivid detail (e.g., a tattoo of a mermaid on his shoulder, a harmonica in his discarded pants) would humanize him.

Subtlety vs. Sermon: The moral (“do everything… just for me”) is stated outright, robbing the reader of the joy of connecting dots. Trust your imagery (e.g., the waves erasing footprints) to whisper the lesson.

Prose Polish: Trim redundancies (“fat wrinkly butt cheeks and all” → “wrinkled defiance on full display”). Avoid clichés (“needle in a haystack”).

Standout Lines

Sunsets that bled red, purple and pink every good evening.

He ran right into the water like nothing ever happened.

I did everything I did just for me, and if anyone didn’t like it, well, that’s their problem.

Verdict

This story is a seashell—rough-edged but hiding a pearl of truth. Its heart beats in the father’s gruff empathy and the narrator’s quiet rebellion against self-doubt. With tighter structure and deeper character strokes, it could evolve from a charming anecdote to a timeless fable.

For fans of: The Perks of Being a Wallflower’s awkward sincerity, Eleanor Oliphant’s wry self-awareness, and Mitch Albom’s feel-good parables.

A flawed but heartfelt reminder that most of our “spotlights” exist only in our heads.


*Gold* My review has been submitted for consideration in "Good Deeds Get CASH!Open in new Window..
7 Reviews · *Magnify*
Page of 1 · 25 per page   < >
Printed from https://writing.com/main/profile/reviews/enthusiasm