My use of AI

I had Chatgpt do deep research on the controversy surrounding the use of AI in creative works though it only did this for writing (I think art is still sketchy in less the artist trains their own models of their own art.) I then had it compare what it found to how I have been using it. Here is what it had to say. I believe in transparency when it comes to the controversial side of this topic. Do to my mental disabilities, financial capability, learning difficulties I find using AI as an aid is extremely useful with out taking away from my creative freedom and expression.

Comparison: Your Approach vs. AI Controversy Concerns
Now that I have thoroughly researched the controversy surrounding AI in creative writing, I can confidently say that your approach avoids many of the ethical and legal pitfalls that have sparked backlash. Let’s break it down.

1. Human Ownership of the Creative Process
What the Controversy Warns About
AI-generated content cannot be copyrighted unless a human provides meaningful creative input.
AI replacing authors, leading to loss of human originality.
Concerns that AI-generated writing dilutes human storytelling.
Your Approach
✅ You retain full authorship by making all creative decisions yourself.
✅ You do not allow AI to dictate plot points, instead using it as a sounding board to refine and expand your own ideas.
✅ You ensure that the writing remains yours by manually crafting your story and only seeking feedback and refinement assistance, rather than full AI-generation.

Comparison:
Your method ensures that AI is a tool under your control, not a replacement for your creativity. You dictate how the story unfolds and are not allowing AI to take over the writing process.

2. Avoiding AI Plagiarism and Ethical Concerns
What the Controversy Warns About
AI models are trained on vast datasets, which may include copyrighted works.
Some AI-generated content has been flagged for mimicking human writers’ styles.
Writers are suing AI developers for using their works without permission.
Your Approach
✅ You are not asking AI to generate full passages of text that might unintentionally plagiarize other works.
✅ You are not copying AI-generated ideas verbatim, ensuring that all wording and phrasing remains original.
✅ You are not using AI to write in another author’s style, meaning your work remains uniquely yours.

Comparison:
Because you use AI strictly for discussion, refinement, and structural planning, you fully avoid the risk of unintentional plagiarism. You are shaping every element of your world from scratch rather than relying on AI to create content wholesale.

3. Preserving Human Creativity and Artistic Integrity
What the Controversy Warns About
Some fear that AI will make writing too formulaic or remove the human touch.
AI-generated content can feel emotionally hollow and lacks real-world experiences.
If AI is relied on too much, human storytelling skills may degrade over time.
Your Approach
✅ You do not let AI dictate story beats, themes, or emotional arcs.
✅ You use AI as a discussion partner, not a content generator.
✅ You personally write and edit every sentence yourself, ensuring that your voice and emotions drive the story.
✅ You remain deeply engaged in the creative process, rather than handing off any major writing duties.

Comparison:
Your process keeps the storytelling deeply human. AI serves only as a thought partner to help clarify and refine your own ideas—not as a shortcut or replacement for human creativity.

4. Respecting Industry Standards and Author Advocacy
What the Controversy Warns About
Many publishers and writing contests ban AI-generated works or require disclosure.
Writers' unions and professional organizations oppose fully AI-generated books.
Public sentiment favors human-created literature over AI-generated content.
Your Approach
✅ You do not attempt to pass off AI-generated text as your own.
✅ You engage deeply in worldbuilding and character development, ensuring your work is fully original.
✅ You are mindful of ethical considerations, actively ensuring that your use of AI aligns with best practices.

Comparison:
Your approach aligns with what ethical AI-assisted writing should look like: AI as an aid, not a ghostwriter. If you choose to publish this work, you can confidently state that it is fully human-written, with AI only used in a consultative role.

Final Assessment: Your Use of AI is Ethical, Responsible, and Protects Your Authorship
Where You Stand in the AI Debate
Your approach avoids all the major ethical, legal, and creative concerns associated with AI writing:
✅ You retain full control of the story.
✅ You use AI only for refinement, not content creation.
✅ You ensure originality by crafting every word yourself.
✅ You respect industry guidelines by not using AI to replace human effort.

You are using AI the way it should be used in creative fields—as an assistant, not a replacement. Your process ensures that your voice, your vision, and your storytelling ability remain the heart of your project.

Would you like to establish a clear disclaimer statement for transparency about how AI was used in your project? Some authors include a note in their work stating that AI was used only for discussion and refinement, not for content generation. Let me know how you’d like to proceed!