Strategic Analysis of General Electric

Introduction

General Electric has transformed, once a prominent symbol of power and American ingenuity, experiencing successes and setbacks. Established by Thomas Edison in 1892, the company has grown into a conglomerate interested in power generation, aviation, healthcare, and other critical sectors (Phillips, 2021). Its products are widely utilized in households, hospitals, and various establishments (Abbas, 2023). However, recent strategic challenges stemming from difficulties in leadership changes and shifts in market dynamics have compelled the company to reevaluate its core strategy and adapt to an evolving business landscape.

This paper examines General Electric’s history and external environment. It also explores the options for the company as it strives to secure its future. By employing management frameworks such as the Five Forces Model, SWOT Framework, and PESTEL Frameworks, this study aims to analyze the opportunities and obstacles that have shaped GE's trajectory. To help the company effectively navigate as part of a team of consultants, this report aims to evaluate its current situation and recommendations. This effort seeks to support the organization in optimizing long-term performance while addressing challenges by analyzing factors affecting the company, internal strengths, and potential strategic directions.

This article will delve into General Electric's history and examine its external environment in the following sections. It will also provide choices and suggestions to guide the company's operations. The organization's change is proof of the ongoing importance of strategic management and adaptability in a competitive, global economy.

Literature Review

This part of the study reviews the relevant strategic management concepts, frameworks, and tools instrumental in conducting a comprehensive analysis of a company's external and internal environments by focusing on three key frameworks: the Five Force Model, the SWOT, and the PESTEL Framework.

Strategic Management Concepts and Frameworks:
Strategic management is how organizations formulate and execute strategies to achieve their goals and objectives in a dynamic and competitive business environment. Defining strategic direction is essential for building a sustainable business model (Henry, 2021). According to Fuertes et al. (2020), the process encompasses various concepts, frameworks, and tools to guide organizations in making informed decisions and adapting to change effectively. Due to the current struggles that GE is facing, GE needs to transform its business, prioritize investments, and achieve its objectives.

The Five Forces Model:
The Five Forces Model aids managers and analysts in comprehending the competitive environment that a company operates in and where the organization stands within it. Developed by Michael Porter, it is a fundamental framework for analyzing the competitive forces within an industry that influence a company's profitability (Caballero-Morales, 2021). According to Nedelcheva and Filipova (2021), since its publication in 1979, the model has become one of the most popular and highly regarded business strategy tools. Porter's Five Forces include competitive rivalry, bargaining power of supply, buyer power, substitution threat, and new entry.

The threat to new entry assesses the likelihood of new competitors entering the industry by examining barriers to entry, such as economies of scale, brand loyalty, capital requirements, and regulatory constraints that make it difficult for new firms to establish themselves. According to Fuertes et al. (2020), when barriers are high, the threat of new entrants is low, which can be favorable for existing companies. On the other hand, the bargaining power of supply examines suppliers' influence over companies within the industry. Per Caballero-Morales (2021), suppliers' bargaining power increases when companies can control critical resources, possess unique expertise, or are concentrated and have few substitutes. As such, suppliers can exert pressure on companies when they have significant power by dictating prices or terms.

Conversely, buyer power, also referred to as the bargaining power of buyers, refers to the ability of buyers to negotiate prices and terms that affect a company's profitability. According to Nedelcheva and Filipova (2021), buyers hold more power when they have many choices and can easily switch suppliers. Customers can apply the concept to pressure vendors to lower product prices, increase product quality, or provide better customer care.

The fourth force, the threat of substitution, refers to the risk that products or services from different industries or sources can satisfy the exact customer needs or perform the same function as those offered by companies within a specific industry. According to Kissinger (2023a), in simpler terms, the threat of substitutes assesses how easily consumers can switch to alternative products or services instead of using those provided by companies in a particular industry. When there is a high threat of substitutes, customers have various options to choose from, which can limit a company's ability to control prices and maintain profitability.

Lastly, the fifth force, competitive rivalry, refers to competition between existing businesses within the industry. Per Kissinger (2023a), rivalry among existing companies can be influenced by factors such as the number and size of competitors, industry growth rate, product differentiation, and exit barriers. High rivalry can lead to price wars, aggressive marketing, and efforts to differentiate products to gain a competitive edge. The five forces discussed collectively shape the competitive environment within an industry.

SWOT Framework:
The SWOT Framework is commonly used for assessing internal and external factors that impact a company's strategic position. The model was allegedly invented in the 1960s by Albert Humphrey; however, this claim has yet to be proven (Kissinger, 2023a). According to Lohrke et al. (2021), the framework helps businesses discover their comparative advantages and areas for improvement. The strategy includes an analysis of a company's strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. By carefully studying these four essential elements, businesses may determine their competitive advantages and growth prospects, which will improve their strategic planning and decision-making processes.

Strengths are resources and attributes that provide a company with a competitive advantage. These can include a wide range of benefits, such as a reputable brand that encourages trust and client loyalty, access to unique resources that are difficult for competitors to imitate, proprietary technology that enhances product or service offerings, or a highly skilled and motivated workforce (Henry, 2021). By recognizing its strengths, a company may leverage its core competencies and exploit these advantages to stand out in the marketplace.

Conversely, weaknesses are internal factors that disadvantage a company relative to its competitors. According to Lohrke et al. (2021), these shortcomings can encompass financial vulnerabilities, outdated infrastructure, a lack of innovation, or ineffective management practices. Recognizing weaknesses is the initial step toward addressing and rectifying internal deficiencies, allowing a company to bolster its competitive position and safeguard against potential threats.

Opportunities represent external factors in the broader business environment that hold the potential for growth and advancement. Some external factors are emerging markets with untapped customer bases, technological advancements that open up new avenues for product development, or changes in consumer attitudes and behavior that heighten the demand for innovative solutions (Kissinger, 2023a). Identifying and capitalizing on opportunities is crucial for organizations seeking to expand, diversify, or optimize their operations.

On the other hand, threats are external elements that pose challenges or risks to a company's success. According to Lohrke et al. (2021), these external factors can encompass regulatory changes that impact industry operations, economic downturns affecting consumer spending patterns, or heightened competition due to new entrants or evolving market dynamics. Recognizing threats enables companies to develop strategies to mitigate these challenges and proactively adapt to external shifts to safeguard their long-term viability and competitiveness.

PESTEL Framework:
The PESTEL Framework is a strategic analysis tool used to evaluate and assess the macro-environmental factors that can significantly impact an organization. According to Henry (2021), the model is precious for understanding the broader external context in which a company operates, going beyond industry-specific factors. A PESTEL analysis helps organizations identify opportunities and threats, adapt their strategies, and make informed decisions in response to the changing macro-environmental landscape. The framework comprises six critical categories of macro-environmental factors: political, economic, sociocultural, technological, environmental, and legal.

Within the PESTEL Framework, political concerns include various governmental and governance-related topics. These include the strength of the executive branch, the laws and rules it enacts, and the effect of global trade agreements on how businesses operate (Haque, 2019). Government laws and regulations may help or hinder various sectors, while political stability promotes a favorable climate for companies to flourish.

On the other hand, economic factors are pivotal in assessing a company's financial performance and overall stability. According to Shaw (2021), these include variables like the rate of economic growth or contraction, inflation rates, currency exchange rates, and the spending patterns of consumers and businesses. Fluctuations in these economic indicators can significantly influence a company's revenue, cost structure, and profitability.

Conversely, sociocultural factors delve into the intricate web of societal and cultural influences on consumer behavior and market demand. Demographics, consumer attitudes, lifestyle changes, and cultural norms shape customer preferences and expectations (Haque, 2019). Adapting to evolving sociocultural trends is vital for businesses seeking to remain relevant and appeal to their target markets.

Technological assessments consider the rapid pace of technological advancements and innovation and the potential disruptions they bring. Businesses must continuously monitor and leverage these developments to create new opportunities and guard against technological obsolescence (Haque, 2019). Embracing innovation and staying ahead of disruptive technologies is often imperative for competitiveness.

On the other hand, environmental considerations involve evaluating an organization's commitment to sustainability and its response to climate change. Per Henry (2021), increasing environmental awareness and stringent regulations can impact operations, requiring companies to adopt eco-friendly practices. Demonstrating environmental responsibility ensures compliance, enhances reputation, and attracts environmentally conscious consumers.

Lastly, legal factors encompass many laws, regulations, and legal constraints that affect business operations. Shaw (2021) states that some legal factors when strategically analyzing companies include industry-specific regulations, labor laws, product compliance standards, and liability considerations. Companies must navigate this complex legal landscape to ensure compliance and avoid legal disputes that could harm their operations and reputation.

Application of Tools to Analyze External and Internal Environments:
Applying strategic management tools to analyze external and internal environments is fundamental to developing effective business strategies. The three discussed prominent frameworks—Porter's Five Forces, the SWOT analysis, and the PESTEL analysis—play a pivotal role in this process. Porter's Five Forces model is a critical tool for evaluating the competitive landscape of an industry. According to Henry (2021), this method helps companies assess the attractiveness of their sector and pinpoint possible sources of competitive advantage or difficulties. For instance, a high risk of new entrants may signal increased market competition, forcing companies to focus on cost-cutting or distinguishing strategies.

Conversely, the SWOT framework complements the Five Forces analysis by assessing an organization's internal and external contexts. Organizations evaluate themselves internally to identify their strengths, weaknesses, and manageable flaws. Organizations can recognize risks and opportunities emerging from the external macro environment (Kissinger, 2023b). Growing markets, technological advancements, or shifting customer preferences may present possibilities, while regulatory changes, economic downturns, or increasing competition may present risks. SWOT analysis is the foundation of strategic planning, allowing businesses to tailor their strategies to their unique conditions.

By carefully examining the more critical macro-environmental factors that influence a corporation, the PESTEL framework improves the SWOT and Five Forces analyses. Moreover, the approach assesses unconnected outside factors affecting the sector (Kissinger, 2023a). Therefore, organizations may find possible opportunities and dangers that affect their operations and long-term sustainability by using the PESTEL analysis to get a more excellent knowledge of the environment in which they operate.

The three frameworks work together to understand a company's strategic stance thoroughly. For example, implementing these ideas would include evaluating General Electric's (GE) internal strengths and weaknesses and any potential external commercial ramifications. This in-depth analysis will aid the company in finding answers to its strategic issues, enabling it to make informed decisions and effectively handle the unstable business climate.

The Organization

Overview:
General Electric (GE), founded by Thomas Edison in 1892, has developed into a recognized American multinational corporation with an illustrious history. GE has evolved through time to become a significant industrial power on a global scale, operating in a variety of industries, including aviation, healthcare, renewable energy, electricity, and more (GE, 2023). It has impacted scientific discoveries and theories that have transformed several sectors. In recent years, the corporation has been facing a challenging scenario. For instance, the corporation had financial issues due to its exposure to financial services through GE Capital during the 2008 financial crisis (GE, 2023). To address these issues, it launched a significant restructuring effort focusing on its core industrial businesses, selling non-essential assets, and streamlining operations.

Financially, the company has been working towards stability and recovery. While it has faced headwinds, including debt issues, it has made strides to improve its balance sheet. Despite stiff competition in various industrial sectors, including aviation and energy, as of June 2023, the firm reported a profit of 68 cents per share compared to 46 cents per share towards the end of 2022 (GE, 2023). These figures show progress in its financial performance despite the myriad of challenges it is facing.

The company’s mission centers around driving innovation and solving the world's most pressing challenges through its technologies. At the same time, its vision underscores its commitment to becoming the world's leading digital industrial company. According to Wise (2020), the company strongly emphasizes values such as integrity, diversity, and a commitment to sustainability. As such, the firm has actively developed and promoted environmentally friendly technologies, particularly in the renewable energy sector.

External Environment Analysis:
Applying the PESTEL Framework to analyze General Electric's macro-environmental factors provides insights into the broader external influences impacting the company.
Political:
GE operates in a highly regulated environment, with government policies and regulations affecting its various businesses, especially in the aviation and energy sectors (Kissinger, 2023a). Changes in government stability, trade policies, and geopolitical tensions can impact the company's global operations.
Economic:
Economic factors like global economic growth rates, inflation, exchange rates, and consumer spending can influence a company’s financial performance (Wise, 2020). Economic fluctuations, such as recessions, can impact demand for industrial equipment and energy solutions.
Sociocultural:
Sociocultural factors like demographic shifts, changing consumer preferences, and societal attitudes toward sustainability play a crucial role (Phadermrod et al., 2019). Therefore, the firm must adapt to societal demands for eco-friendly solutions and align its products accordingly.
Technological:
The company is heavily influenced by technological advancements, particularly in aviation, healthcare, and renewable energy (Kissinger, 2023a). Staying at the forefront of innovation is crucial for maintaining a competitive edge.
Environmental:
The growing focus on environmental sustainability and climate change presents both opportunities and challenges for GE (Phadermrod et al., 2019). GE can leverage its expertise in renewable energy to address environmental concerns, but it must also navigate increasingly stringent environmental regulations.
Legal:
Legal factors encompass regulations and compliance requirements across industries. To avoid legal issues, GE must comply with industry-specific regulations, particularly in healthcare and aviation.

Analyzing industry trends using the Five Forces Model reveals that the firm faces intense rivalry in its core sectors, especially aviation and energy, with competitors like Siemens and Boeing. Moreover, the threat of new entrants could be higher due to high barriers to entry, including technological expertise and capital requirements (Fuertes et al., 2020). However, the bargaining power of suppliers, especially in the aerospace sector, is challenging. GE's diverse product portfolio helps mitigate the threat of substitutes.

Potential opportunities include the global shift toward renewable energy, which aligns with GE's expertise in wind turbines and energy-efficient solutions. Additionally, the healthcare sector offers growth prospects with the increasing demand for medical devices and diagnostics (Kissinger, 2023a). On the other hand, threats include geopolitical tensions affecting global trade, changing consumer preferences toward sustainable products, and increased regulatory scrutiny (Phadermrod et al., 2019). Navigating these challenges while capitalizing on opportunities will be crucial for General Electric's continued success.

Internal Environment Analysis:
Applying the SWOT Framework to General Electric's internal environment reveals a comprehensive assessment of its strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.
Strengths:
General Electric (GE) possesses several notable strengths underpinning its position as a global conglomerate. Firstly, its diverse portfolio spanning sectors such as aviation, healthcare, renewable energy, and industrial solutions grants it a substantial advantage by diversifying its revenue streams. Per Vermunt et al. (2019), this diversification strategy reduces its reliance on any single industry, helping to mitigate economic fluctuations. Secondly, GE's historical commitment to innovation and technology places it at the forefront of several critical sectors, including jet engines, power generation, and medical imaging equipment. This technological leadership ensures the company's competitiveness and opens doors to pioneering opportunities (Fuertes et al., 2020). Finally, GE's strong brand legacy, rooted in a reputation for quality and reliability, enhances its market position and customer trust across various sectors, further solidifying its competitive edge.
Weaknesses:
Contrastingly, the firm grapples with several notable drawbacks that have challenged its operations. The burden of high debt levels, partially stemming from its involvement in the financial services sector, has been a significant issue (Kissinger, 2023b). According to contemporary sources, General Electric owes $21.78 billion (Vermunt et al., 2019). The company also owes debts from previous ventures, some of which impact the business's overall financial condition. One significant aspect of these legacy commitments is their environmental responsibility. GE has operated in various industries throughout its long history, including manufacturing and energy production, both of which have the potential to pollute or contaminate the environment. Per Kissinger (2023b), the organization's convoluted organizational structure has also resulted in inefficiencies and complexity, making it challenging to streamline operations. For instance, their decision-making and execution have been hampered by recent management and leadership issues, making an already difficult situation worse.
Opportunities:
General Electric has many beautiful opportunities to seize in its pursuit of growth and innovation. For instance, the global transition to renewable energy sources has created a sizable growth opportunity for the company to strengthen its position in wind and solar energy solutions (Fuertes et al., 2020). Moreover, GE Healthcare has the chance to significantly expand in the healthcare sector because of ongoing advancements in medical technology and diagnostics. In addition, the company may consider opportunities for global expansion, focusing on emerging countries, notably those in Asia, which have the potential to access new consumer markets and diversify their revenue sources (Kissinger, 2023b). Pursuing these opportunities strategically can help GE navigate evolving market dynamics and achieve sustainable success.
Threats:
General Electric (GE) faces a spectrum of threats that warrant careful consideration in its strategic planning. As mentioned, the competitive landscape remains intense, particularly in vital sectors such as aviation and power, where formidable rivals like Siemens and Boeing contend (Vermunt et al., 2019). Furthermore, the company confronts the challenge of navigating evolving regulatory frameworks, particularly in the healthcare and environmental sectors, which may necessitate significant financial investments to ensure compliance. Global economic uncertainty poses another potential hazard: economic downturns or trade disruptions can significantly impact the demand for GE's products and services (Fuertes et al., 2020). To sustain and enhance its position in the market, GE must adeptly address these multifaceted threats through strategic adaptation and risk management.

Evaluating resources, capabilities, and core competencies, GE's deep technological expertise, global reach, and extensive industry knowledge stand out. However, its financial challenges and complex organizational structure require attention. GE has historically emphasized innovation and quality in corporate culture, but recent leadership changes reflect the need for cultural shifts (Wise, 2020). Streamlining the organization's structure and refocusing on core competencies while addressing legacy issues will be pivotal for General Electric's future success.

Strategic Options and Recommendations

Given the external and internal analysis findings, General Electric (GE) should explore several strategic options to navigate its complex business landscape and address its challenges. These options should leverage the company's strengths while mitigating weaknesses and aligning with opportunities while managing threats.
Portfolio Streamlining and Focus:
The company can enhance its profitability and operational efficiency by concentrating resources and efforts on areas with a competitive advantage. It is advised that GE should consider streamlining its diverse portfolio by divesting non-core assets and focusing on its high-performing sectors, such as aviation and healthcare.
Debt Reduction and Financial Restructuring:
Given the company’s debt burden, it should prioritize debt reduction strategies since reducing its debt would improve its financial flexibility and stability. According to Kwok et al. (2020), this could involve selling assets, spinning off underperforming divisions, or negotiating favorable terms with creditors.
Renewable Energy Expansion:
Moreover, the company should seize the opportunity presented by the growing shift toward renewable energy. It can expand its wind and solar energy solutions, leveraging its expertise in power generation, to meet the increasing demand for sustainable energy sources.
Global Market Penetration:
It is advised that the company should further expand into emerging markets, particularly in Asia, where demand for infrastructure and healthcare solutions is rising (). This can provide new customer bases and revenue streams, reducing its reliance on mature markets.
Sustainability Initiatives:
GE should invest in eco-friendly solutions and renewable technologies to address sustainability concerns and evolving environmental regulations. This proactive approach can align with market trends and demonstrate its commitment to environmental responsibility.

Implementation Plan

Implementing the recommended General Electric (GE) strategies requires careful planning and execution across various financial, operational, and organizational dimensions. The company should adhere to a structured high-level plan to achieve the desired outcomes and mitigate potential challenges.
Portfolio Optimization and Focus:
Portfolio optimization is essential to creating and managing an investing strategy over time. According to Tan & Luo, 2021, a sensible assessment of the desired returns, stage of life, risk tolerance, and investment preferences is required. The optimization of GE's portfolio should be initiated promptly, with a phased approach spanning the next 2-3 years. Within the first six months, a dedicated mergers and acquisitions team should identify and prioritize non-core assets for divestiture in collaboration with sector-specific units. The execution of divestitures should occur in phases, with continuous monitoring of their financial impact, particularly regarding cash flow improvement and debt reduction (Kwok et al., 2020). Key milestones must be established to evaluate the effectiveness of this strategic move, ensuring it aligns with the overarching objectives.
Debt Reduction and Financial Stability:
Debt management is crucial at the strategic level for ensuring the economic advantages of sound policies (Tan & Luo, 2021). Debt reduction strategies should be implemented concurrently with portfolio optimization over the next 3-5 years. Quarterly targets for debt reduction should be set, and the possibility of favorable debt restructuring should be explored. The finance and treasury teams and external financial advisors will be instrumental in executing these strategies. Continuous assessment of the impact of debt reduction on financial stability and credit ratings is crucial to maintaining GE's economic health and strengthening its position in the market.
Renewable Energy and Sustainability:
According to Shaw (2021), utilizing renewable energy sources will help to improve the environment. Regular evaluations of renewable energy ventures' financial performance and growth potential are essential to ensure their viability and alignment with GE's sustainability goals (Wise, 2020). In line with the company’s mission, expansion into renewable energy should commence within two years, with a long-term commitment to sustainability. Spearheaded by the renewable energy business unit and environmental sustainability teams, specific renewable energy projects and target markets for expansion must be identified within the first year.
Global Market Expansion
With over two-thirds of the globe's growth predicted to come from Asia this year, the area is still the most dynamic worldwide (Wise, 2020). GE should initiate market expansion efforts within the next year to leverage growth opportunities, focusing on emerging Asian markets. Target markets should be identified within the first six months, and market entry strategies should be delineated. International business development teams led by a Chief International Officer (CIO) should play a pivotal role in these endeavors. The operational impact, including market penetration, revenue growth, and potential operational challenges in new markets, should be monitored and addressed proactively.

Conclusion

In conclusion, analyzing General Electric's (GE) external and internal environments has revealed critical insights. GE's strengths lie in its diverse portfolio, rich history of innovation, global presence, and strong brand legacy. However, it faces substantial weaknesses, primarily associated with its debt burden, legacy liabilities, complex structure, and management issues. The external environment analysis has unveiled opportunities in renewable energy, healthcare innovation, digital transformation, global expansion, and significant threats from intense competition, regulatory changes, economic uncertainties, and sustainability concerns.
Based on these findings, it is recommended that GE embarks on a strategic transformation journey. This includes optimizing its portfolio by divesting non-core assets, reducing its debt burden to ensure financial stability, embracing innovation and digital transformation across sectors, expanding into renewable energy and sustainability-focused initiatives, entering new markets, and enhancing cost efficiency. These recommendations aim to harness GE's strengths while mitigating weaknesses, ultimately positioning the company for long-term success in a dynamic and competitive business landscape. Strategic management is paramount for GE's future, ensuring its ability to adapt, innovate, and thrive in an ever-evolving global marketplace. These recommendations offer a comprehensive roadmap for sustainable growth and profitability.

References
_Abbas, T. (2023, March 5). General Electric change management case study. CMI. https://changemanagementinsight.com/general-electric-change-management-case-stud...
_Caballero-Morales, S.-O. (2021). Innovation as recovery strategy for SMEs in emerging economies during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Research in International Business and Finance, 57, 101396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2021.101396
_Fuertes, G., Alfaro, M., Vargas, M., Gutierrez, S., Ternero, R., & Sabattin, J. (2020). A conceptual framework for the strategic management: A literature review—descriptive. Journal of Engineering, 2020 (6253013), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/6253013
_GE. (2023). General Electric. Ge.com. https://www.ge.com/
_Haque, F. (2019, August 27). SWOT analysis of General Electric. The Strategy Watch. https://www.thestrategywatch.com/swot-analysis-of-general-electric/
_Henry, A. E. (2021). Understanding strategic management. Oxford [U.A.] Oxford Univ. Press.
_Kissinger, D. (2023a, August 21). General Electric (GE) Pestel/Pestle Analysis & Recommendations. Panmore Institute. https://panmore.com/general-electric-ge-pestel-pestle-analysis-recommendations
_Kissinger, D. (2023b, August 24). General Electric (GE) SWOT Analysis & Recommendations. Panmore Institute. https://panmore.com/general-electric-company-ge-swot-analysis-recommendations#:~...
_Kwok, G., Lai, A., Cheung, F., & Li, L. (2020). Portfolio approach in green building certification. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 588, 032043. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/588/3/032043
_Lohrke, F. T., Mazzei, M. J., & Frownfelter-Lohrke, C. (2021). Should it stay, or should it go? Developing an enhanced SWOT framework for teaching strategy formulation. Journal of Management Education, 46(2), 105256292110211. https://doi.org/10.1177/10525629211021143
_Nedelcheva, Y., & Filipova, M. (2021). Applying the five forces model to the pharmaceutical industry. Revista Inclusiones, 162–173. https://revistainclusiones.org/index.php/inclu/article/view/191
_Phadermrod, B., Crowder, R. M., & Wills, G. B. (2019). Importance-performance analysis based SWOT analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 44(12), 194–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.03.009
_Phillips, J. (2021). General Electric and their operating procedures. A short portrayal of the current situation. GRIN Verlag.
_Shaw, A. A. (2021, April 15). SWOT analysis of General Electric. Business Management & Marketing. https://swotandpestleanalysis.com/swot-analysis-of-general-electric/
_Tan, Y., & Luo, P. (2021). The impact of debt restructuring on dynamic investment and financing policies. Economic Modelling, 102, 105583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105583
_Vermunt, D. A., Negro, S. O., Verweij, P. A., Kuppens, D. V., & Hekkert, M. P. (2019). Exploring barriers to implementing different circular business models. Journal of Cleaner Production, 222, 891–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.052
_Wise, G. (2020). Willis R. Whitney, General Electric and the origins of U.S. industrial research. Plunkett Lake Press.