\"Writing.Com
*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
BY ONLINE AUTHORS
Printed from https://writing.com/main/polls/item_id/1681972-Ds-Grammatical-Conventions-Poll
Item Icon
\"Reading Printer Friendly Page Tell A Friend
(13)
by Jeff Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 18+ · User Poll · Erotica · #1681972
Should proper grammatical usage be ignored for stylistic effect?
Poll Question:

The use of capitalization in D/s (Dominant/submissive) relationships is often used to denote authority versus subordination. Thus, a Dominant personality would have their name capitalized (John Smith, Master/Mistress, etc.), while a submissive personality would have their name intentionally left in lowercase (john smith, slave, etc.).

The purpose of this poll is to find out what you think about this practice as it relates to proper grammar. Is it okay to write, "Mistress Sasha had her new slave. john smith was hers forever." Or, if you're writing something in the first person perspective as a submissive, is it okay to lowercase the "i" pronoun (i.e. "Mistress Sasha had her new slave. i was hers forever.")?

Is it okay to intentionally intentionally violate the rules of proper grammar for stylistic effect or lifestyle naming conventions?

Please vote below!

Poll Options:
      No, proper grammatical rules should be followed at all times.
      Yes, it's okay to violate grammatical rules for stylistic effect ONLY.
      Yes, it's okay to violate grammatical rules for lifestyle naming conventions ONLY.
      Yes, it's okay to violate grammatical rules for stylistic effect OR lifestyle naming conventions.
Note: Once you have voted, you will be shown the current results for this poll. You may only vote one time in each poll and you will see up to the minute results anytime you may view it again.
Printed from https://writing.com/main/polls/item_id/1681972-Ds-Grammatical-Conventions-Poll