... with your skills at conveying metaphorical language with teaching skill, you might want to do another article on "REVIEWING"... as so many in here seem to think it means, "finding fault", trying to find something to justify the "review". As you can see, I've had those whose sole purpose was to offer some form of correction lest they feel 'inadequate" in their review. Sometimes the shortest reviews can be the best... ie: immensely powerful, superbly written, riveting read, and so on. At least the author knows he's achieved the most important thing in writing... reaching and retaining an audience to the point they were entertained, left satisfied, and/or having evoked some form of emotional response. It's not about topic either, as I've slammed for same. as well, but about the skill in delivery no matter the theme or topic. I've been asked to read and review items that were of no interest to me, or actually repulsed by them for content... but recognized the skill of the author in delivering the piece.