Writing.Com 101 [E] Explanations and instructions of all things Writing.Com. |
Dear The StoryWitchress , I just today read this with some difficulty to fully comprehend. It’s so well thought out, reasoned and meticulous. It shows that WDC is very passionate about the integrity of review rewards. I never noticed until two years ago, it’s not the number of reviews but by credit. So, I have been all about quality since; not fluff. Eyestar recruited me to review for their group and was honored. Schnujo’s reviewing forum with support staff helped me hone my reviewing approach. Altogether, encouraged, especially with recent response from Max Griffin (7 R.O.A.R. awards, cherished), I finally get it…fully. I respect what you do, and with the help of the mentioned friends and many more, hope to represent as best can the values and ethos on which WDC thrives on. You know how many grateful people have responded with such appreciation of my feedback? I owe it to the community for my growth overall as writer. Community, support of good reviewing, all benefit writer’s growth, which I also see clearly intoned in another article on reviewing read previously today. I’m so glad I did. Thank you, Brian Since day one, I’ve hunted for writers who wanted to support one another on shared quests of publication. Fingers crossed. I’ve laid myself bare to any who’d witness. Surely, I’m overcompensated, having been blessed with this fortitude nearly 18 years now. 24in24
|