Now that's a healthy way of looking at it, really. What benefit is it to Writing.com to be lumped into a list with a bunch of poorly-designed sites? And down at the bottom (alphabetically)?
On the other hand, at least one person has said that they found Writing.com through that list in a previous year. So it's at least a little pile of breadcrumbs, metaphorically speaking. Okay...crouton crumbs. A bit stale, but it can still lead you here.
Maybe those of us with our own Web sites should start a "101 Best Sites for Writers According to [name]" and list Writing.com 101 times. Think what that would do in a search engine.
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
Invalid Item This item number is not valid. #769015 by Not Available.
Need help with your writing? Visit
Invalid Item This item number is not valid. #746496 by Not Available.
The following section applies to this forum item as a whole,
not this individual post.
Any feedback sent through it will go to the forum's
owner, The Critic.
Printed from https://writing.com/main/forums/message_id/864508
All Writing.Com images are copyrighted and may not be copied / modified in any way. All other brand names & trademarks are owned by their respective companies.
Generated in 0.10 seconds at 4:08am on Nov 28, 2024 via server WEBX1.