Thank you for debating me. You've provided an excellent foil against which to sharpen my ideas. I learned a lot.
I believe I have found another subtle point I haven't made sufficiently. Isn't it important that the stuff they read be your ideas, the specific ideas you're writing about, in that special way you have? Or could somebody else write the stuff, and you'd have achieved your goal? If it is the former, then that makes you a writer by my original definition. If the latter, I don't know. You might be a publisher, or something else. Doesn't mean you can't or shouldn't do the writing yourself, but probably that would be the best way for a publisher to operate: have a writer do it.
Seriously, without our exchange I wouldn't even understand what I was talking about so clearly. Excellent work.
P.S. I get physical withdrawal when I don't have something to write on and with. No matter how poorly I write, I figure that makes me a writer. Being good or bad at it, that's a different thing.
The following section applies to this forum item as a whole,
not this individual post.
Any feedback sent through it will go to the forum's
owner, Thundersbeard 30DBC JULY HOST.
Printed from https://writing.com/main/forums/message_id/3024347
All Writing.Com images are copyrighted and may not be copied / modified in any way. All other brand names & trademarks are owned by their respective companies.
Generated in 0.12 seconds at 11:52pm on Feb 01, 2025 via server WEBX2.