The interesting thing is that we did revise the crap out of the story, and then another friend (and managing editor of another magazine) said she prefered a previous version and would've picked it immediately (we're wonderfully blunt with each other's work, so I can trust that statement). Most of the time when I'm adament about keeping something, there's a reason, and the prefered version is the one I had to begin with.
I was more wondering about other people's stories of publishing woe. And I know that practice helps us out of the mediocre lable, but I also know it's a matter of perception. Is there no other way to become non-mediocre without going mainstream?
The following section applies to this forum item as a whole,
not this individual post.
Any feedback sent through it will go to the forum's
owner, Liam Jackson.
Printed from https://writing.com/main/forums/message_id/1715659
All Writing.Com images are copyrighted and may not be copied / modified in any way. All other brand names & trademarks are owned by their respective companies.
Generated in 0.11 seconds at 1:05pm on Dec 24, 2024 via server WEBX2.