Hello Phrase,
I happened upon this poem in the Review Request Page,
and I'd like to review it.
Firstly, I LOVE the title--it's very unique, stands out, and enhances the content of your poem. Great job!
As for the caption, I'm questioning the "tact" part. Usually we associate tact as a good quality...why would the wicked be concerned about tact? Wouldn't they do the opposite? So, I'm not sure I follow this, and perhaps it's a bit misleading or contradictory without intention.
Aside, I love your opening line--very good use of repetition and it sounds great.
Stanza 1:
As I said, I love the first line; the rest is kind of dry, though. It's kind of like reading Heidegger, or any other philosopher who doesn't "flower" his words.
Another problem is that it doesn't sound natural, it's almost theatrical in diction, and kinda puts a sour taste in ones mouth--of course, this is just my take on it.
The content, although very peppered, is also questionable, or doesn't make sense to me. Not that it has to, but in your poem it sounds like you want to make sense, or at least share your take on "thingliness" as a beast of oneself in relation to what one may consume, or become if one consumes--that's my take on it...but anyway, back to the questionable content...
So self-defining they’re like walls
You can run through
But can’t disown
Not sure I follow this one--I understand the wall is a simile for the thing that's self-defining, but where does it lead to in relation to something you can't disown? I think it's the simile of the wall that works against your statement.
Stanza 2:
Good flow to this one, and it's less verbose...well, except for the ending, which, if read aloud, sounds off meter with the previous lines. You have a good rhythm in the beginning, then you use too many words in the end, making it longer than it should be in order to keep the meter consistent.
Also, I would suggest omitting unnecessary words like "and which"...although, I do see why you added it (to keep with the rhyme scheme/flow)... but it's just a suggestion. Without these words weighing down the piece, it would be more enjoyable.
Overall, this poem does need work...especially with the wordiness, and with the flow towards the end of this piece.
Other than that, I enjoyed the read.
Happiness always,
M.
|
|