Hi
Hyperiongate
I have visited your portfolio and did find this very interesting story in the auto reward section. And the impressing thing about belonging and the nuances as so very well captured here. The sensitivity and maturity both coexist and thrive here.
Here is a detailed review of "Indigo Girl."
Overall Impression
This is a touching, heartwarming story that blends supernatural elements with a classic adoption narrative. You have taken the concept of "Indigo Children"—often described as highly empathetic or psychic—and used it to explain the bond between a mother and daughter.
The story succeeds in creating an emotional arc. We feel sorry for Angela in her isolation, frustrated by the cold bureaucracy of the orphanage, and finally relieved by the connection at the end. The twist—that Samantha is also an "Indigo"—is the perfect way to resolve the conflict. It explains why Samantha felt the "tug" and why Angela wasn't overwhelmed by her presence.
Strengths
1. Sensory Description of Empathy
You did a great job describing what it feels like to be Angela. Instead of just saying "she was psychic," you described the physical toll of it:
* "...her mind became flooded with pictures, voices, sounds and emotions."
* "Breathing became difficult. It felt as if she were drowning..."
This allows the reader to understand why she is non-verbal. She isn't just being difficult; she is protecting herself. This makes her a very sympathetic protagonist.
2. The Antagonist
Ms. Hartman serves as an effective foil to Samantha. Her cold, business-like approach ("She wanted a sale; to move the merchandise") highlights Samantha’s warmth and intuition. While Hartman is a bit of a villain, she provides the necessary conflict to make Samantha’s choice feel rebellious and right.
3. The Ending
The final line—"The two indigo girls, mother and daughter - teacher and pupil"—is a fantastic conclusion. It reframes the entire story. Suddenly, we understand that Samantha isn't just saving Angela; she is the only person equipped to understand her. It turns a simple adoption story into a story about destiny.
Areas for Improvement & Suggestions
1. Point of View (POV) "Head-Hopping"
This is the main technical area to watch. The story shifts perspectives very rapidly, sometimes within the same scene.
* Example: In the office scene, we are in Ms. Hartman’s head ("She wanted this one"), then immediately in Samantha’s head ("Forcing a smile, Samantha reached over...").
* The Fix: Try to stick to one character’s perspective per scene (or use a scene break/asterisks to signal the switch). For instance, keep the office scene entirely from Samantha’s point of view. We can guess Hartman is desperate by her actions; we don't need to hear her inner thoughts to know she is pushy. This creates more tension for the reader.
2. "Show, Don't Tell" in the Intro
The story opens with a dictionary-style definition of Indigo children: "New-Agers believe that children born with an indigo-colored aura..."
* The Fix: Consider cutting the first three paragraphs and starting directly with Ms. Hartman or Angela. You do such a good job describing Angela’s powers later in the story (the noise, the overwhelming feelings) that the reader will figure it out. You could weave the term "Indigo" into the dialogue at the end, or have Samantha think it, rather than explaining it to the reader upfront. It adds a bit more mystery.
3. Mike’s Role
Poor Mike! He is there, holding Samantha's hand, but he has zero dialogue and no input on the decision.
* The Fix: Give Mike a line or two. Does he feel the connection too? Or is he confused? Even if he just asks, "Samantha, are you sure?" it would make him feel like a real participant in the scene.
4. Dialogue Polish
Ms. Hartman’s dialogue is a little "on the nose"—meaning she says exactly what she is thinking without much filter.
* Example: "I am sure you will be very pleased," she said in a way that made Samantha wince.
* Suggestion: Make her sound more like a salesperson trying to hide her desperation. Instead of just saying she wants a sale, have her over-hype the kids. "We have a lovely boy, very quiet, perfect for a young couple." It makes her manipulation more subtle and realistic.
Now I dive deep into the understanding and remedy.
1. The "Indigo" Lore: Integration vs. Exposition
The Issue:
The story opens with a textbook definition: "New-Agers believe that children born with an indigo-colored aura..."
While this ensures the reader understands the premise, it removes the mystery. By telling us immediately that Angela is "Indigo" and what that means, you rob the reader of the joy of discovery.
The Fix:
Imagine if you removed the first three paragraphs entirely. Start with Ms. Hartman looking at the files.
* Why this works better: We would see Angela suffering on the playground—the noise, the overwhelming emotions—and we would wonder, "Is she autistic? Is she telepathic?"
* The Reveal: Save the word "Indigo" for the very end. When Samantha sits down, instead of just saying "I'm going to be your mommy," she could whisper, "I see your colors, Angela. They're the same as mine." This makes the title of the story a payoff at the end, rather than a definition at the start.
2. The Pacing of the Adoption (Suspension of Disbelief)
The Issue:
The ending is emotionally satisfying but logically incredibly fast.
* The Sequence: Samantha looks out the window -> Samantha walks to the playground Samantha says "I am going to be your mommy" -> They walk away hand-in-hand.
* The Reality Gap: Even in fiction, adoptions—especially of "problem children"—involve immense paperwork, background checks, and transition periods. Walking off "into their new world" immediately feels a bit like a dream sequence rather than a narrative resolution.
The Fix:
You can keep the emotional beat without breaking reality.
* Suggestion: Have the connection happen on the playground (the touch, the shared aura). Then, cut to a scene in Ms. Hartman’s office where Samantha is fiercely signing papers while Mike looks bewildered but supportive.
* OR: End the story right at the touch on the playground. End it with the promise of adoption, rather than the act of walking away.
* Drafting Idea: "Samantha looked back at the office window where Ms. Hartman stood watching. She knew the paperwork would be a nightmare. She knew the state would put up a fight. But looking at Angela, she knew the war was already won."
3. The "Invisible Husband" Problem (Mike)
The Issue:
Mike is described as holding hands and walking, but he has zero agency. He is a prop.
* Why this matters: Adopting a special needs child (which is what they think Angela is) requires two yes votes in a marriage. If Samantha decides unilaterally, it makes her look impulsive and potentially unstable, rather than intuitive.
The Deep Fix:
You need to give Mike a reaction to validate Samantha’s choice.
* Scenario: When Samantha runs to the playground, have Mike run after her.
* Dialogue:
* Mike: "Sam, wait, they said she doesn't talk."
* Samantha: "She talks to me, Mike. Can't you feel it?"
* Mike: (Pauses, looks at the girl, sighs, then smiles). "Okay. I trust you."
* Result: This makes the couple a team and makes the ending much stronger.
4. The "Head-Hopping" (POV Analysis)
This is the technical aspect that most needs work. Let's look at the "Playground Scene" specifically.
Current Text:
Angela saw her approach. Understanding broke across her consciousness... (Angela's Head)
Samantha had to circle around the metal wall... (Observation/Samantha)
Samantha reached out... She looked like an angel. (Samantha's Head)
"I know," Angela replied smiling... (Dialogue)
Why it weakens the scene:
By jumping into Angela’s head to say "Understanding broke across her consciousness," you lower the tension. We know she is safe.
Proposed Rewrite (Staying in Samantha’s POV):
If you stay purely in Samantha's head, the tension remains high. She doesn't know if the girl will scream or run.
Samantha approached the metal structure. The little girl stiffened, her eyes wide and terrified. Samantha froze, terrified she had made a mistake. She lowered her mental shields, projecting the only thing she felt: safety. Slowly, the fear drained from the child's face.
See the difference? It feels more active because we aren't being told what Angela is thinking; we have to figure it out alongside Samantha.
5. Line-by-Line Polishing
* Text: "Her safe place was only steps away... A sudden squeal... caused her to glance up briefly - big mistake."
* Critique: "Big mistake" is a bit colloquial/casual for the serious tone of the rest of the story. Consider: "It was a mistake that cost her the silence she craved."
* Text: "Ms. Hartman was well aware of how the month had gone so far."
* Critique: This is "telling." Show us her looking at a quota chart, or sighing at a calendar on her desk.
* Text: "New-Agers believe..."
* Critique: Using the specific term "New-Agers" dates the story and feels a bit clinical. It takes the reader out of the fiction.
Summary of "More" Advice
* Cut the Intro: Let the story be a mystery until the end.
* Empower Mike: Give him a line of dialogue so he isn't just a cardboard cutout.
* Fix the Head-Hopping: Choose one POV per scene (Samantha’s is likely the strongest driver for the plot) to increase emotional tension.
* Ground the Ending: Acknowledge the reality of adoption paperwork, even if just for a sentence, to make the magical connection feel more earned.
Final Thoughts
"Indigo Girl" is a sweet, satisfying short story. The connection between the characters is the heart of the piece, and you nailed that chemistry. The reveal that they share the same gift provides a wonderful sense of closure—Angela isn't just getting a home; she's getting a mentor.
With a little tightening of the POV to stop the "head-hopping," this would be an incredibly polished piece of fiction.
Great job capturing the feeling of finding where you belong..sindbad
|