I had your same moment of clarity not long ago, but don't be fooled by it. I have come to realise it is a flase clarity, or at least, only the beginning of clarity.
It is important to remember that people create moral theories that at a time, and in their mind, are absolute truth. Whatever your opinion on events such as the dropping of the atom bomb, you must accept that these decisions are based on a solid moral "truth", at least from the perspective of the responsible people. If you compare the "I Have A Dream" speech Hitler's infamous Nurenberg Rally, you cannot deny that these speeches, no matter how far apart morally, contain an equal conviction in their delivery, and an equal rousing of support from the spectators. Nowadays, we are inclined to say that King's is more true, and Hitler's less true, because we are inclined to say that prejudice is wrong.
Philosophy, including that of Morality, has progressed in a similar way to, and with the aid of, science. As much truth as Socrates and Aristotle gave us, we cannot say that everything they said was true-- just take a look at their thoughts on the universe. This could be compared to Newton's theories on gravity. As true as they were, it still took hundreds of years to realise the universe is expanding, even though the maths was available, because of other "truths" that blocked the progression of his theories. Darwin's theories on evolution have also been improved upon.
You speak of your round table, which I believe to be a good way of decision making, but would you listen to the "evil" characters of history with as little prejudice as those of the "good". Would you have made a different decision based on all the knowledge they had available to them?
There is no doubt that the soldiers worldwide who kill and torture, even away from the battlefield, believe they are doing so for a good cause. "Because I love America" maybe.
Nietzsche would say we should rise above good and evil, as these concepts are based on a lack of evidence-- or truth. At least these acts are not mediocre, and drive the human spirit towards change and improvement. From chaos comes creation, destruction an opportunity to rebuild. Though this seems scary and a boost for terrible acts, are we sorry that a meteor killed the dinosaurs, perhaps leading to the conception of man, or the great fire of London which marked the end for terrible living conditions in many areas?
To get the world to sit around a table is unrealistic, so one by one, we must individually seek to break away from the chains that we don't like, and try to sees the ones we do like are also chains, and bind us tighter than those we hate.
Your essay was written a while ago, and would be interested to know on how your thoughts have developed, what you believe is your |