Some suggested edits:
"It had taken thirty days of continuous house to house fighting to kick the gooks out of Hue"
I would suggest hyphenated "house to house" into "house-to-house." Since these words describe the type of fighting in the correct context only when combined, it would help clarify their meaning to the reader.
"Leaning down, Jimmy grabbed doc and hoisted him on his shoulder and turned and ran back toward the river."
Here, you should have capitalized "doc" into "Doc" this is the only time I noticed this mistake throughout this story, but with each and every typo noticed, a reader is more distracted from the story itself.
Also, I noticed that many of your dialogs didn't lead into the post dialog descriptor with a comma, instead completing the dialog and treating the descriptor as a separate sentence.
For Example:
“Hang in Jimbo.” He yelled in his friends ear.
These sentences technically works, but since your intent is to state that Doc yelled the quoted comment instead of the yelling being a separate, following action, it should instead be connected with a comma like this:
"Hang in, Jimbo," he yelled in his friend's ear.
--There is also a missed comma to address his friend with, and a missed apostrophe to indicate ownership in this example. I would suggest doing a quick punctuation check on this story to catch these minor mistakes.
Also, the line at the end about the stranger not being drunk enough to go home and sleep feels too cheesy for him to say out loud, maybe internally, but not out
loud. Why? Because it feels too cliche, saying that "Look at me, I'm a war vet who is suffering so much that I have to rely on alcohol to calm my emotions."
However, if slightly reworded and said internally, this can add emotional impact to stranger's painful memories.
My overall impression of this piece is that the war flashback was a nice story tale summary of a man's descent into disillusionment and dehumanization because of the Vietnam war. The pace was good, the narration clear and concise, though the majority of this piece seemed to lack any major attention to word use. Almost all of the descriptions were "tellings". I know this is a story being told orally by the stranger, but as a semi-legendary story teller at the bar, it seems that he should put more pizazz into his narration. Most of the sentences were flat statements.
Also, I have to point out that a story told by a mysterious old man that makes an impression upon a group of youths, only to find out that the old man had actually given a personal account is a frequently used cliche. This doesn't directly detract from a story's value, but it does mean that the intro was predictable and possibly dead weight on the rather marvelous historical fiction account that you have developed.
In the end, the fable-like tone of the war story was compelling, though often lacking emotional detail, and it made for an very entertaining read in spite of the cliched intro and epilogue. I would suggest editing vague descriptors, punctuating emotional moments with more intense description, and dropping the beginning/ending bar scenes.
In the end, it's all up to you what to do with your story. It's always wise to consider every review with skepticism. This was a very well put together story that hints strongly at your talent; all it needs is an editing run or two.
Best wishes,
Brandon Evans
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
|
|