I am reviewing as part of the Simply Positive Reviewing Group. Remember, please, that my feedback is just one opinion in a world of opinions and yours to consider or ignore at your pleasure.
This is charming and well written. It bears a subtle "moral," that, though sometimes boring, reading helps achieve goals. This is a very importang message.
As for the writing, this is very well done with consistent rhythm and rhyme, and no obvious errors of spelling or punctuation.
My only problem, and a minor one at that is in:
"To hunt amongst the trees in bitter nights,
Blending with the night his scales so sleek."
"night" is repeated. I think this is an easy fix, should you choose to change it.
Thank you for sharing this. I really enjoyed reading it, aloud, i might add.
Keep writing,
Elizabeth
Welcome to WDC! I am reviewing as part of the Simply Positive Reviewing Group. Remember, please, that my feedback is just one opinion in a world of opinions and yours to consider or ignore at your pleasure.
I love your writing - both pieces posted. I can see little to improve. I love the ambiguity of this piece. If ever there was a clear picture of denial, this is it. It also demonstrates the futility of defining our value by other people's responses at any given moment, and the danger of acting from a single impression.
As for the writing, there is a typo in the next to the last sentence. I didn't notice any other problem.
I look at the quotes around the word death in the next to the last line. I am imagining the line without them, with little success. Now that they are there, I can't make them not there. I wonder if I would have seen the same meaning without them.
This is very imaginative and very well done.
Thank you for sharing it.
Elizabeth
I did read it aloud and it was wonderful! It sets a wonderful mood and makes me want to take off my shoes and play in the rain like I did as a child. I like the mindfullness of it, the intense focus with acceptance and not judgement -- no complaint about the rain, no "this is wonderful rain," just description. I especially love the forth stanza.
About the writing: It is not obvious to me why you made the first indent. I can't see how I would think differently about the poem if it was not indented.
Also, your use of punctuation is inconsistent - commas but no periods or caps. This actually didn't bother me very much, but I still suspect it would be better with consistency.
All in all, this is delightful! Thanks for sharing it.
Remember, please, that this is your poem and not mine and my feedback is just one opinion in a world of opinions and yours to consider or ignore at your pleasure.
How lovely to think of yourself this way, to see death in such a positive light.
My favorite lines are:
"One day I’ll be an angel, sitting by my mother.
I’ll know peace and happiness that is unlike any other."
I also especially like the first line. I like these because they read naturally when read aloud. The rhythm rolls right off the tongue.
The problems I see here are mostly rhythm.. There is also a problem with inconsistent tense.
I hope you will continue to revise and turn it into a poem worthy of the images.
What a cheerful poem! I had never thought about the tooth fairy as a being who could shape-shift from tooth to Fairy. What a cool image.
As for the writing:
although the rhymes are consistent, there are places where the syntax is a bit distorted or sounds forced. I struggle with that myself. Recently, I Googled Henry Wadsworth Longfellow and read some of his rhymed verse to prove to myself it can be done without that effect. Of course, I'm no Longfellow, but perhaps you will become one. Plug away. You can make this a lot better. A recent past Poet Laurette of the US, Ted Kooser, said it takes him a year to write a poem. I am finding it takes me more than that.
Your poem has wonderful imagination and imagery.
Keep writing.
I like this. It hits a chord with me. It is well written.
My only problem has to do with rabbits wearing glasses being called "sheeple." Why not "bunple" or "rabble." Or, have sheep wearing glasses instead of rabbits?
There is an excellent treatment of this metaphor in the musical "The Fantastics." I think you would enjoy it if you are not already familiar with it. I am glad you have not let your brain become useless with all the stuff you mention in the poem.
This is wonderful! It is a great metaphor for society, for change in the human condition, for individual growth - well done!
There is a typo in the last stanza.
I can see the posts, worked out of place as drunk, but I cannot see the arrogance. I can see arrogance in the false facade.
In
"Main Street, the front row, your best face, the downtown
suit, we save for church and the guy at the bank."
the comma after suit does not make sense to me. Also, it sounds like you are saying the downtown suit is saved for the man at the bank as well as for church. Is that your intent?
Capitalization and punctuation seem inconsistent to me with caps at the start of the stanza, but none after periods.
Do not misunderstand: I love this and see these as minor issues, but addressing them will improve the presentation.
Thanks for sharing it. This deserves a shameless plug.
Keep writing.
Elizabeth
No wonder the speaker has writers' block. He is using two powerful techniques to repress his feelings; drinking alcohol and cutting. This piece presents a very clear and disturbing picture of symptoms of an illness that is much more real and serious than writers' block.
As for the writing, I really like the format as it visually represents the inner conflict. My only reservation is the end. I don't see why he is reaching for another razor blade. It feels as if another look at the page would precede the last line.
This is a clear description of the kind of loneliness that is not coming from outside the person, but is instead from within. The unresolved nature of the poem puts the reader smack down in the middle of the problem.
This is well written, with a consistent rhythm and pattern except the forth verse which has extra syllables and breaks rhythm.
Thank you for sharing this.
Keep writing.
Elizabeth
Well done, Interesting ghost story with the symbolic undertail of the intensity and difficulty of abuse and the problems with forgetting.
Writing: I don't see a lot of problems and most are minor.
stanza 1: last line: "were curious with motives." there is no more mention of the motives, either directly or indirectly.
stanza 2. "we were told and urban tale" has rhythm problems. Consider "we'd heard ..."
In ballads, it is traditional to use punctuation. In this case, I think it would enhance
both sound when read aloud, and clarify meaning.
Stanza 3: fine as is.
Stanza 4: You use "down" three times. To emphasize the sense of depth, twice would
work, but three seems a bit too much.
Stanza 5: last line "he knew what he had to do." Consider using "must" instead of
"had to" for the sake of rhythm.
stanza 6: for rhythm, consider reversing order in line two" both kids and" and
replacing " teachers" with staff.
stanza 7: "and smiled all the more" rhythm and meaning are weak. ?...to watch it
roar?
stanza 8, last line: the word "and" seems out of place. ?"with" perhaps?
The rest is very good.
These are minor details that might improve an interesting poem. I hope they are of some use to you, but, remember- these are only suggestions.
Thank you for sharing this. I really enjoyed reading it.
Keep writing.
Elizabeth
Having read this and thought about it, I realized it must have something to it because I want to read it and solve the mystery that is presented and solved. I hear laughing in the words and want to laugh, too. I wonder if my projected meaning is your projected meaning, but I really don't want to know. I have nothing to criticize. Thanks for sharing.
Keep writing.
I can hardly see for the tears in my eyes. I had, and lost someone like that, and then someone else. Every word rings true and good and right. I suppose I could say something about the writing, find something here or there to suggest, but I don't want to. I want it to stay just as it is, just like the speaker wants Poppy to stay the way he is. The metaphor of the band aid is very effective.
Thank you.
Keep writing!
Elizabeth
What a gruesome tale!
The tone and mood are carried well by clear detail.
I see no spelling, grammar, or punctuation errors.
My only reservation is at the end. It seems to me there would be no time or urge to go out again the same night as his lust would be satisfied for the time being. Besides, there would be a terrible mess to clean up. How would he have time? Also, there is absolutely no hint of reservation rooted in fear of apprehension, or some lingering element of distaste for some part of the situation. People usually have some ambivalence about any activity that is highly stimulating after it is over.
Nevertheless, this is well done!
Keep writing.
Elizabeth
.
This seems to discuss the relationship between emotion and spirituality, and the issue of external vs. internal control. It has a mysterious, somewhat mystical tone.
About the writing:
over all, there are pieces of lovely description. Sensory images are used effectively to convey mood. The image of the red ribbon is effective in generating mystery and the overall point of the story.
Problems:
This has a first draft quality, and the writer suggests it is a first draft. As such, it has a number of problems to be resolved. There is a lot of redundancy that makes reading a bit tenuous. By this, I mean, things are repeated unnecessarily generating tedium. I see a number of errors in consistency of quantity and tense.
Examples of changes that might help:
First paragraph:
I would simply drop the first sentence and let the second start the story. I would consider dropping both sentences about her heart and let the strong sensory images convey this information. Let TomasX5 have more of the role of describing her heart.
Paragraph 2: Last 2 sentences are confusing as the references are unclear.
Strengths: There are pieces of wonderful description:
"Beneath Evelyn’s arms the bright steel of the railings was cold and smooth, a single bright sensation in a mass of sepia and grey."
"The ribbon was red. It was even more red than Evelyn had imagined it to be. In the dark sepia landscape of the balcony it shone like a beacon. The nondescript man held one end in his hand, and the other end floated into the depths of the car,"
Last paragraph: writing is concise, and successfully conveys information without weaknesses found in other paragraphs.
This is a good start and has promise.
Keep writing.
Elizabeth
OOOO! Sharp, descriptive, this poem could be used as tick repellant! Which is meant as a compliment to your success at conveying intensity in a few short lines. This has a nursery rhyme quality in that it is rhythmic, and it actually does what it describes - pulls the reader in, then stings.
The images used are quite traditional, as is the form, so it could have been written 200 years ago or today. As a consequence, it also has a quality that seems familiar, like a nursery rhyme. One could say it over and over, jump rope to it, or tap it out while dancing in a circle.
It's only weakness is its strength - such familiar images.
Thank you for sharing this.
Keep writing!
Elizabeth
I am smiling! The ambiguity of this is luscious. The use of a limerick to say something about a relationship that often gets expressed in serious tones tickles my funny bone. It seems to suggest your mother was playful with a good sense of humor. It reminds me of my Irish relatives, who married into the family. They were always the light in the room. (I think I may have mentioned them to you in a previous review.)
As you have reviewed a number of mine, it is only right that I reciprocate.
Comparing mathematics to the divine, or, using mathematics to describe the divine is not a new idea. However, in a time when there is a resurgence of questioning if science supports or conflicts with spirituality, it is timely to say it again.
Personally, I like when people think as this poem speaks. I find such people interesting and entertaining, and very safe to be around. This, in my mind, is all excellent.
As for the writing, it is, in general excellent. I would change nothing until the last two lines. (Ending is so often difficult!)
"Geometry is sacred. It's something we should see clear.
Without its universal laws, we wouldn't even be here."
The problem lies in the last part of each sentence. The rhythm breaks, and quality seems reduced. I would suggest something like:
Geometry is sacred as it easily describes
the essence of reality in which we all abide.
Well, that's not so great, is it? The problem is the wording seems not to match the rest of the poem, like your creative juices were running dry by the last two lines, as if they are forced. They just don't live up to the rest of the poem. They aren't terrible, and will do, until you find something better.
I see you have a fan who loves it just as it is. I approach the task of review as an opportunity to fine tune and take something very good to the level of excellent. After you have been so positive about my writing, I feel just the tiniest pang of guilt for seeing something to improve in a very fine poem. I hope the critique is helpful, nevertheless.
It is always risky to critique a poem that is so personal. It is also difficult. I question: if I felt the emotion, is this enough? What do I want to consider?
That said, what do I see here?
Rhymed couplets that don't strain.
Each line has a period at the end whether or not it is a sentence end. This emphasizes the line end focusing attention on the end rhyme and disrupting flow of speech.
The poem has a sweet and loving tone that is more powerful than other issues and gives the poem value. I feel very welcome as the reader. I love to hear stories about good fathers.
Thank you for sharing this.
Keep writing.
I like the mood of this - poignant, both happy and sad at the same time. I also like the focus on nature as being reliable when people change. I can't tell from your introduction if you would like to have your meter more consistent. In case you do want to make that happen, I am offering a few suggestions. Of course, you evaluate what I say, use what makes sense to you and throw the rest away. The writing of poetry is a complex task.
Stanza 1, line three: the meter is easy to fix. Just drop "just."
Stanza 2, line 1: a two syllable word in the place of "still" would help. It occurs to me that "always" might work. There is a disruption of the rhythm in "sneak up on them" but I see no way to fix that. If you read classic poems by great poets, they often have breaks in rhythm somewhere, either because their dialect is different from mine, putting the accent in a different place, or because they would sacrifice meaning to make it fit.
Stanza 2, line 2: drop "in" and your meter is fixed.
Line 3: you could say "sometimes he hides behind a cloud"
Stanza 3 line 1: if you substitute "too" for "also," the rhythm is fixed. You might need to put commas before and after "too," but that is just an option.
Stanza 5 line 1: Dropping substituting "kids" for" children" at the start would fix the rhythm.
Line 2: "I know because I come each day" would work.
Line 3: Dropping "in" would help.
These are all minor changes. Usually, fixing meter is not all that hard.
I enjoyed reading this. Thank you for sharing.
Keep writing.
Elizabeth
This evokes deep sadness in me, and seems generally effective as a poem.
The problems I see are small details that influence the overall strength of the poem.
"My thoughts, they never change Both the comma and word "they" seem
unnecessary
Over and over, daily I wallow I would use either "over and over"
or "daily", but not both
Like a barren tree crying out in drought
Almost dead, I am I would move "watching" up to follow "am."
Watching the days go by me How about "watching the days rush by"
I continue to ignore her questions
The days have gone by so fast' If you change "watching...," this would
seem unnecessary
"The sun goes up
But the sooner it falls
I hold on to my breath" I don't understand these lines. I can't see
the connection between the sun rise
and fall and the speaker holding his
breath.
The basic idea is very good. The images are effective. The problems I see are in the details of writing. Keep working on this. It has all it needs to be an excellent poem.
Keep writing.
Elizabeth
This is clear, meaningful, and interesting. I like the rhythm and rhymes. I especially like how you build the comparison to world events and the question of relative values.
There is a problem several places with over use of "and." Sometimes, it even disrups rhythm. Common usage instead of:
"Symbols and formulas, calculations and equations,"
would be:
Symbols, formulas, calculations and equations,
In poetry, you can even eliminate the other "and" if you wish.
The last sentence of second stanza Crumbles should be Crumble; the four things in line three crumble crust.
"Would they rise from their graves and change the History," It looks as if you include "the" for rhythm. Consider "alter history" instead.
I enjoyed this poem very much. Thank you for sharing it.
Elizabeth
I like the message of this poem. It is clear and worth saying. You are struggling with the ending, I think, because you are telling, not showing. I wonder how you could change that? Your approach to the subject is on the large scale, society as a whole. It is much harder to make a sound point at this level. I suspect something, perhaps several things, have triggered this poem. It would be worth your effort to reflect on what is triggering your thinking, and write a poem with a more specific story. You might come up with a stronger poem for which the ending is more obvious to you. As for this poem, the ending matches the rest of the content and there is nothing really wrong with it except you need to run your spell check on it. You are doing some serious thinking about a big subject. You may write 5 or 6 things before you get said what you want to say in the way you want to say it. Be patient with yourself and keep writing. You are headed in a productive direction.
Elizabeth
about the last line, I see what you intend now, and I am puzzled why I didn't understand. I obviously did not read it too fast. So how to fix that so people get it right away. Here is a suggestion: "One day when I leave, I'll return to a fire." What do you think?
Elizabeth
Printed from https://writing.com/main/profile/reviews/howellbard3/sort_by/r.review_creation_time DESC/page/9
All Writing.Com images are copyrighted and may not be copied / modified in any way. All other brand names & trademarks are owned by their respective companies.
Generated in 0.22 seconds at 8:05pm on Sep 07, 2024 via server web2.