\"Writing.Com
*Magnify*
SPONSORED LINKS
Printed from https://writing.com/main/profile/reviews/fadz
Review Requests: OFF
165 Public Reviews Given
183 Total Reviews Given
Public Reviews
Previous ... -1- 2 ... Next
1
1
Review of She Has Your Eyes  Open in new Window.
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+
Hello there, Jim!

I believe I haven't welcomed you to LP!, nor have I introduced myself. I'm Fadzlishah Johanabas (that's my name, without my dad's name), but to friends and family, I'm Fadz. As you'll find out, I'm quite outspoken (and some say obnoxious) when it comes to reviewing stories. I hope I won't offend you too much with this review.

Here it goes:


1.
“Sir, we have a distress call coming in from the Drega System.”

Damn, thought Captain Ben Saxton, {i]Why couldn't it have waited another five minutes. By then, we would be a jump away and this would be someone else's problem.

It had been a long six-month deployment and everyone was looking forward to seeing their families again. He took one last look at the photo of his wife with Lisa, their newborn baby girl in her arms.

“She has your eyes.” That was the last line that accompanied the photo from home. Ben drank in the image for a moment longer, surprised by the emotional tug he was feeling in his chest. With a quick click, he shut down the viewer. He knew he would see them both soon enough. They were just two jumps away from home; a little more than a week ship-time. For now, duty called. Reluctantly, he left his cabin and headed up to the bridge.


Your opening is not gripping enough, and a tad long-winded with too much back story.

"Sir, we have a distress call from the Drega System."

Captain Ben Saxton tore his gaze away from the framed picture of his wife and their newborn daughter Lisa long enough to glare at the console. Five more minutes and this would have been someone else's mess, he thought. He turned his attention back at the photo and traced a finger along the baby's face.

"She has your eyes." That was his wife's last message that accompanied the photo.

Ben drank in the image a little longer before placing the frame back on his small cabin desk. I'll be home soon enough. Reluctantly, he headed for the bridge.


- Just a suggestion, mind. There are more active actions, and his character/personality shows. You don't need to mention the emotional tug. His actions are enough to show it.


2. Sergeant Angelo was busy calling up data on the Drega system. “Just a sec, Captain...”

- Redundant. You've written 'busy calling up data', then you repeated with 'Just a sec'.


3.
For not the first time, Ben was frustrated by limited resources. This was his first command and as such, it was smaller and significantly less capable that his last post as a minor officer on one of the fleet’s star cruisers. Those colossal ships had over ten thousand personnel onboard. Bristling with the latest in high-tech weaponry and commanded by an A.I., there was little in the known universe that could stand against one.

At the other end of the scale was the F.S.S. Undaunted, fleet frigate and Ben's first command. At only fifty meters in length, it was small and fast; designed to deliver a powerful punch. The ships A.I. had delivered the Captain and his men into more heated battles over the last several months that anyone care to think about.

Ben Saxton, a career military man, had seen his share of action. The universe was a dangerous place, filled with aggressive species trying to grab a bigger piece of the infinite. Only the might of the Federation kept the predators at bay. Ben and his platoon had done their part, at least for now. It was time to go home and recharge.


- Too much passive voice. I noticed this throughout the story.
- wrong usage of a semicolon.
- correction: ship's
- correction: than anyone cared
- suggestion:
Not for the first time, the ship's limited resources frustrated Ben. Being his first command, it was smaller and significantly less capable than the fleet's star cruiser, where he had served as a minor officer. The colossal ship had over ten thousand personnel on-board. Bristling with the latest weaponry and commanded by an AI, little in the known universe could stand against it.

At the other end of the spectrum was his current ship the FSS Undaunted, a fifty-meter frigate. The ship was small and fast, designed as a front-liner to deliver a powerful punch. In the past several months, Ben and his crew had been in the thick of more battles than they cared to think about. It was high time for them to go home and recharge.



4. The total population is estimated to be three hundred; mostly scientist and their families.

- wrong semicolon usage. Replace with comma
- correction: scientists


5. ...it would be ten to one against them; not the best odds against a fierce opponent like the Biotopes.

- improper semicolon use.


6.
Eighteen minutes later, the Federation Scout ship blinked into existence six miles above the surface of Drega-1. A heartbeat later, a missile struck them amidships, splitting the small craft in half. Secondary explosions lit up the sky over the human habitat.

The Biotopes, satisfied that the minor interruption had been taken care of, continued their assault on the defense shield. They would breach it within the next couple of minutes. After that, it would be over quickly.

Ben fell with his arms by his side to minimize atmospheric drag on his suit. Had anyone bothered to look closely, they would have seen twenty heavily armored marines falling towards the ground maintaining perfect radio silence.


- underplayed. This bit could have been expanded so much more. What happens to the crew? It's like you've been up close and personal throughout the story so far, but when it comes to the vital part, you pull away and watch from an impassive distance. When I read this, I went, "Eh? What happened?"
- What makes him decide to destroy his ship? I'm sure as his first command, he'd have more pride and sense of ownership of the ship. Plus, I'm quite certain it'll be a black mark on any captain, to make the decision to destroy an expensive ship just like that.


7. They huddled together for one last time; waiting for the end that was sure to come.

- again, wrong semicolon usage.


8. His last thought - she has your eyes…

- correction: His last thought: she has your eyes....


9.
So much for the element of surprise, he thought. They had been on the ground for only a few seconds and already three men were gone. That made three families back home that would be met with a folded flag rather than a husband or dad.

No time to worry about that now, Ben thought, pushing aside any feeling of regret or remorse. They had a battle to fight.


- I'm not sure I want him as my captain. He seems not to care that much about the loss of his ship and the deaths of people under his command. If you did not intend to portray him as a reckless, irresponsible person, you've got a lot of reworking to do.


10. He could just lay low.

- correction: lie


11. You keep on repeating the phrase "She has your eyes", so much so that it loses its significance and beauty, and becomes annoying. Gotta lose most of them, and only use them at places where they pack a punch.


12. Your MC's behavior is at odds. The way he keeps on thinking about his family, he places value in it. The way he rushes to help strangers, even to his death, shows how valiant he is. But he also sacrifices his ship just like that, and sacrifices his crew members without much thought. His character needs massive rethinking.


13. Now this is the most important bit, I think. Is this story a fanfic of Star Trek? If so, you have to make it clear from the start. If not, the story follows too closely with Trekverse. It's not SF, and you may have a difficult time placing this story. Remember, Star Trek and Star Wars are NOT SF. They are a class of their own. A lot of true SFers are deadset against stories that follow the 'science' of Star Trek and Star Wars.


I hope it's not too late to say that these are just my opinions, and ultimately the story is yours. You decide what you feel is best. Hope this helps.


Cheers,
Fadz.
2
2
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+
Hello Winnie,

This story has gone a long way since you first wrote it, hasn't it?

It's a strong enough piece for publication consideration. However, I still have issues with the piece:

1. You're giving away the story by using words like floated, wafted, hovered. You don't need all that. People will immediately know she's a ghost. Don't worry about trick endings if you don't use such ghostly descriptions, because there is no trick ending. Both men kinda ignored her throughout the story, so that alone is enough to hint at readers that something is amiss. So remove those ghostly descriptions, I say.

2. Remember what I told you how dialogues should be like natural conversation, yet not exactly like it?

Uh . . . Maybe you shouldn’t bring that up right now, Jim. He’s having a bad morning.” Rebecca heard the click of the lighter as her husband returned in a ghostly haze of smoke and grabbed the coffee pot.

“Leads, huh? You want some coffee, Jim. It’d have to be black. I’m out of cream, you know.”

Rebecca turned to Ted and the memories of that early morning drive began to flash back like an old movie projected in her mind---the crisp coldness of the air---bundling up Amanda and suppressing her giggles so as not to wake Daddy---the note left on her side of the bed: ‘Gone to store with Amanda. You’re out of cream, again. By the way, you snore. Kisses, Becky.’

“Nah, I’d better get to headquarters.” Jim stood by the kitchen window shifting from one foot to the other and shot a thumb over his shoulder. “Uh . . . Nice sunrise,” he said.

“I already tried that, Jim. It didn’t work,” Rebecca whispered.

"Well . . . uh . . . I better be going, Ted. I'll let myself out. Just holler if you need anything."


- See all the 'uh' in red? One is fair, but used repeatedly? Gets annoying.
- 'By the way, you snore.' I assume they were married, or at least had been living together. She wouldn't comment on it unless she wrote the note after the first time they slept together. If she had written 'You were talking in your sleep again.' it will be fine, because people don't normally do it every time they sleep, and it would also mean something was troubling him.


Corrections:
1. He raised his head and starred at the reflection.
- He raised his head and stared at his reflection.

2. He brushed passed her and headed to the night stand...
- past

3. “I know it hurts, but it’s so beautiful where she is.
- "I know it hurts, but it's so beautiful where I am."


Cut off a few words, and send it to Every Day Fiction  Open in new Window.. All the best!
3
3
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: 18+ | (3.5)
Hello Uncle Ben,

Much better this time 'round. Leon is more fleshed out, I don't feel cheated with the appearance of the hydra, and overall my logic alarm isn't pinging.

But, to me, something is amiss with the narrative voice. You have plenty of narrative commentaries that sound like Leon's voice, but not italicized. For example:

- Leon thought it was stupid, but he didn't mind the chance to linger near the windows and watch the babes saunter in and out of the Ambiance across the street. Yowza!

additional comment on this one: I'm really sorry for saying this, but this sentence makes the author seem like an old man trying to mimic a teenager, but failing miserably. I would say the same even if I didn't know you, Ben.

- Shit! Leon turned on the radio and screeched out of the shopping center, headed for the hills.

- Good eating, but no competition for me. On the other hand, maybe some were female.

- Nah, he'd better go with a car accident.

- Nothing but plastic tubing, which he couldn't pick up as a wolf. It figured. (I'm guessing you're using 'it figures' or 'figures' when someone is experiencing a 'doh' moment?)

Since your narrative voice and your character's voice seem to overlap, have you considered writing in first person? I think it can work (gotta check the guidelines, though. Some publications, like Pill Hill Press, don't quite like 1st person). Or else you gotta figure out a way to not make the voices overlap.

OK. The submission is comedic horror, right? The things happening to Leon, and the way he improvises, they're all funny, but only barely so. C'mon, Ben, this is up your alley. You're good at witty and quirky. And there's not enough horror. Not enough details to intensify the gore. What do the heads look like? Scaly, furry, pus and saliva dripping between the fangs, horns, no horns, the size of the body, the length of the tail, the deep marks it leaves in the ground. Make the scene horrifying, but the way Leon fights it, using art materials (which is, to me, quite innovative and original of you), is supposed to make us laugh through the gore.

You have over 500 words to play with. I know you can pack a punch.


I think you can lessen the usage of 'heads'. For example:

1. The monster whipped its heads around with amazing speed as it waded toward shore. Most of the time, the heads were close to each other, but Leon could see gaps, moments when a head was on its own.

to

- The monster whipped its sinuous necks around with amazing speed as it waded toward the shore. Most of the time, the heads were close to each other, but Leon could see gaps, moments when one of them was on its own.


2. Crouching, Leon watched the heads. The pattern was becoming clearer, and he mentally prepared himself. As the top two heads swung down, and the others swung left, Leon leapt to the right. Slashing with his claws, he ripped through the necks of the two top heads. With a roar, he bit through another neck, then threw himself backward to avoid the other heads which jabbed at him.

to

- Crouching, Leon studied each set of faintly glowing eyes. The pattern was becoming clearer, and he mentally prepared himself. As the top two heads swung down, and the others to the left, Leon leapt to the right. Slashing with his claws, he ripped through the necks of the top (seems repetitive, but the best I can offer is 'closest') two heads. With a roar, he bit through another neck, then threw himself backward to avoid gaping maws that jabbed at him.


3. He slashed and bit and clawed, but each time he removed a head, or even smashed it in, two heads grew in its place.


You get my drift, right? You can replace 'heads' with facial features/appendages that will both replace the word 'heads', and add description to the hydra. Win-win.

Please refrain from using 'f.ucking' if possible. Teens say 'freakin'' too. Somehow 'f.ucking' makes the piece almost vulgar.


Observations:

- Damn, he couldn't think like that.
(shouldn't)

- A couple (of) months back, he'd come across a cougar while hunting.

- The best thing was, the serpent's couldn't shoot fire from their glued-together mouths.
(serpents)

- On the other hand, he though, maybe he'll get a pickup now.
(thought)

- Whatever (the) story, he needed to get back to the highway and hitch a ride into town...



I think there are a few more editing/deletion boo-boos. I hope others manage to catch them.


All the best, Ben. My advise would be to make this story a YA piece (style, voice and the whole reading atmosphere).
4
4
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: 18+ | (2.5)
Hello, Ben.

Going right at it, when you said rough, you really meant rough.

While I find the story potentially entertaining, I don't find it as engaging as most of your stories. It feels distant, and I actually skimmed halfway through. Re-read after seeing other reviewers' comments on duct tapes and glues.

I'm going to tackle this review first as a reader.

1. While you foreshadow Leon's werewolf nature nicely, the hydra appears all of a sudden, like a UFO appearing in the sky midway through a LOTR movie. Emphasis had been given on the scene at the store, which does nothing the rest of the story, and after Leon's transformation, suddenly a hydra appears and he's fighting for his life.

Suggestion: Use the hardware store scene for more than to show how bored Leon is. Have the old man, or some customers muttering about sightings at the lake, or the hills, or something. Or have Mr Jamison telling Leon to hurry up before nightfall, lest he be attacked by the monster on the hills near the Art Center. And Leon can get cocky, thinking that if there was one, he would have known about it. Or mislead readers with more werewolf foreshadowing. Anything to warn readers of the coming hydra.


2. The appearance and the hydra itself feels like a planted plot, a literary device to move your story. Foreshadowing will do great wonders.


3. A seven-foot werewolf can curl its paws around a door handle, fit into a car filled with art supplies, and still have room to maneuver to stick tapes around hydra heads? What gives? I can suspend my logic only so much. Some things still have to stick to the rules of logic.


4. I had the initial impression that the hydra is big. But with a big werewolf teenager in the car, it can still poke its head(s) through the windows and get glued/taped?

Suggestion to (3) and (4): I honestly don't know how to go about this. The most logical way I can see this happening is that he drives a pickup truck, and the art supplies are in boxes at the back of the truck. While running away from the hydra, he jumps onto the truck, knocks over some of the boxes, and discovers duct tapes rolling out, and he uses surrounding trees to trap the hydra. Still, I don't see how a werewolf with furry paw-hands can manage duct tapes.


5. I somehow feel distanced from Leon. Maybe because he doesn't act like a normal teenager (except when he's a werewolf)? Maybe because I got turned off when the hydra made its sudden appearance. And since I've read your better works, maybe this one feels especially rough and rushed, like you're experimenting on mashing two unlikely monster genres and see if it works.


Technical stuff:

1. I know you tend to favor gerunds, but some just don't work, such as this: Sighing, Leon called back, "Be right there, sir."
- how does a person sigh and talk clearly at the same time, a complete sentence at that? Try it. It just not logical.

I don't see why you wouldn't use it this way: Leon sighed and called back, "Be right there, sir."


2. His survival kicked in...
survival instinct

The rest have been pointed out. I find the repetition of heads/head annoying, but seeing that you can't do anything much about that...it should be OK.

I wish I could be more helpful. This story feels too raw for me to be considered publication-ready. Looking forward to reading the polished version.
5
5
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: ASR | (2.5)
Hello, Ben.

Reading this reminds me of a story I read in one of the SF anthologies. "Nebula Awards Showcase 2010", I think. It's about race after alien race making its way to a particular spot on a desolate moon of a dead planet. They even destroyed themselves just to reach that spot. Until, at one point, god-like beings reached the spot and studied it. It's a single footprint, where a Moment had happened so many millenniums ago. It's when that race reached out beyond their solitary existence. Even though that race has died out, the significance of that Moment sings out to other sentient beings across the universe.

That race, though not revealed, is obviously humans, and the footprint belonged to Neil Armstrong. From its storytelling, it's a given to read the story in a Nebula Awards showcase. "Whistle in the Wind" echoes that story, but a very pale one.

At 500 words, I know you don't have much to play with. It's a complete story, but lacks oomph and doesn't pack a punch. Might as well start the story from the explorers riding the thermal waves, anticipating glory and excitement, and while doing so you reveal the back story (a bit will do), only to find the skeletons of a dead civilization (put an easily identifiable landmark - up to you to add in futuristic features or not, or gigantic trees growing on those landmarks). End the story there. It then becomes prophetic. The story ends, but people will start asking, what happened to the human race? Instant poignant, resonating short short.

So. Sorry about the low rating. I find it flat compared to the excellent story I mentioned (sorry I couldn't remember the title).

Hope this helps.
6
6
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: ASR | (3.5)
Hello Ben,

Sorry for the late review. I'll see what I can do.

This reads like your previous story, but different at the same time. Both echo Grimm's styles, but where "Lucia's Wish" reads like an adult fiction, "The Sea Witch's Daughter" reads like a children's fiction. I really cannot pinpoint how exactly, but it does.

To me, the story actually begins when she asks her mother for a tempest. The beginning meanders a little, and the ending's too abrupt and simple compared to the amount of unfolding you did.

Things always conspire against her, namely the guards and fast-moving ships. But with the third pearl, she conveniently slips onto a ship bearing royalties and courtiers, and somehow avoids guards (are there any?), and the prince happens to notice her at the back of the procession, and remembers his vague near-death vision, and then in a few short paragraphs learns that Tempterra is not even human, but decides to join her anyway. A lot of coincidences fall into place around her, and as a character, she doesn't really grow.

If you ask me, I'd say scrap the beginning and start with Tempterra asking her mother for a tempest. Later on you can give a brief backstory, and concentrate on what's important -- how she becomes the girl whom the prince sleeps with instead of the Little Mermaid.

This is a retelling of the whole tale (tail?) from a different perspective. Remember what you said about my retelling?

That said, everybody else loves this story, so go with the majority. Technical execution is good and smooth, and the 'YA' feel is constant throughout. Should get a fair chance of getting accepted, I think.


Things that can tighten the story:
1. ...an evil witch lived in the deepest depths of the ocean...
- consider 'depths', 'bowels', 'jowls', 'murky depths'

2. Tempterra was very lonely.
- adding 'very' weakens the effect. I think this is one of the parts that make the story read YAish?

3. The witch stormed and raged...
- sounds cool, but they bring about the same meaning.
- The witch stormed, but at last she relented. gives a stronger imagery.

4. When she looked up, she saw that the ship had landed.
- redundant. When she looks up, of course she'll see something.

5. She felt a searing pain as her tail split into two legs. The pain subsided when the transformation was complete, but the Prince had left the ship and was almost out of sight.
- nothing wrong, but a little more details will make her come to life. As is, I'm not tempted enough to be in her head, to empathize with her.

6. Determined not to miss her chance, she swam close by the ship, risking.
- risking what? I think in your original form, you had 'discovery', right?

7. "Mother, I need a mighty storm."
- a much stronger opening line, in my opinion.

8. Streaking through the ocean toward the ship, Tempterra planned her approach.
- It's a given she's in the ocean.

9. It was morning before she reached shore...
- missing 'the' before 'shore'.

10. ...but she bravely stood at the end of the processional.
- procession? I'm not sure if you're using an American slang.

11. Not a fan of the ending. Too easy.


I'm not going to argue about showing vs telling. This is a long story compressed into slightly over 1.5k words, so you use what you have.

I hope I could've helped more, but the general feel of the story is not quite right. I really hope you get accepted, though.
7
7
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Rising Stars of WdC  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (4.0)
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
generous sponsor: emerin-liseli Author IconMail Icon

-*-


Hello there, SWPoet!

You have a good fireplace story/fable here, in line with Aesop's Fables. With this kind of stories, the omnipresent third person PoV you've executed here is a good choice.

Not much to nitpick; only a few observations to share:

1. Teach me how to be a fox so I can learn my ancestor’s ways.” The fox thought about this.
- new paragraph before 'The fox...'. Use separate dialogue-paragraphs for different characters.

2. “Come out, its me, Dog.”
- correction: it's

3. “Dog, what are you doing here.
- end with '?'

4. How can you know the feeling of living on the outskirts and having to steal for food when you have humans feeding you by hand.
- end with '?'

5. Why the long face, Dog.
- end with '?'

6. Do you see what your actions have caused.
- end with '?'

7. ...running back and forth telling one what the other is doing.
- missing "

8. ...around the smokehouse toward the foxes den...
- correction: foxes', Fox's

9. ...Fox appear before him.
- correction: appeared

10. Dog is curious about sharing ancestry with Rabbit and Fox, but not with Wolf, whom he respects?

Hope this helps.
8
8
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Rising Stars of WdC  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (3.5)
** Images For Use By Upgraded+ Only **
generous sponsor: emerin-liseli Author IconMail Icon

-*-



Hello, Jaye.

I am a member of 'Let's Publish!', and we review stories/poems based on whether they're publication-worthy. I sincerely apologize if my review comes across as harsh and blunt.

I have to say, this feels more of a vignette, a beginning of something much longer, rather than a full story. Sure, you have a beginning, where Lizzie prepares for the auction, and a climax (sort of) when she is bid upon, but as a character, she has not learned anything, and the events have not changed her in any way. In short, there is nothing interesting happening yet. And the name, speech and mannerisms are not consistent with Old West timeframe (not that I'm an expert with the Old West).

Here's what I mean:

1. I think the name Elizabeth or Liz is better suited with the timeframe rather than Lizzie, which sounds modern.

2. Speech inconsistency. "I guess", "huh", "okay", "I've no idea", "Seriously", "heebie jeebies" and some others sound incongruous with historical fiction setting, as they're modern colloquialism.

3. I know back then 17 was considered motherhood age, but would the girls be auctioned off to young men unchaperoned? And for someone who thinks the auction is a waste of time, Lizzie seems to be confident and in control of her situation.


You also tell when you could have left the readers to make their own conclusions. For example,

1. Why can’t I make Mama see? Lizzie thought. She doesn’t realize how rough a life those farmwomen have. How could she when she’s always sitting here making lovely dresses out of gorgeous fabrics? She’s never seen them come into the store with their sun-baked skin, frizzled hair and rough, calloused hands. They all look old and worn out far beyond their years. I couldn’t live like that!
- This part could have been much stronger if you play it out in an immediate scene, when Lizzie goes to town. She can observe the qualities in the hard-life women and just shudder. She doesn't even need to think about not wanting to live that way. You simply slot in her body language. Get the readers involved, have us invest in Lizzie, have us empathize with her.

2. Now no one will know for sure which one is mine.
- telling, when you could just highlight this through action.

3. Lizzie could hardly believe her ears. He might not be leaving after all?
- the part in italic is not needed. Trust your readers to come to the same conclusion.


The dialogues feel stilted. Parts of them feel like what real people would say, and this is not a good thing in fiction.
“You are going to look lovely, my dear,” Mama said. “This color really brings out the blue of your eyes.”

“I don’t need such a fancy dress. It’s just a dance. I can wear one of my church dresses.”

“But, Lizzie, you’re seventeen now! And this will be your first time participating in a box social. It’s time to think of marriage. All of the eligible young men from all over the county will be there. It’s a big opportunity.”

“But, Mama, I don’t want to marry some farm boy!”

“Nonsense, my dear. How about that Whiting boy? He’s quite a nice-looking young man and the Whiting family has the biggest spread around. He’ll make quite a good catch for some lucky girl.”

“Oh, Mama, you just don’t understand!”

“What’s to understand? Every young woman is expected to get married and have a family, that’s what we do. Goodness, you wouldn’t want to be an old maid, would you?”


Read the dialogues out loud. In novels that you love, do the characters speak like this? Go for authenticity and believability.


All in all, an interesting start, and I'd like to read more. What happens between Lizzie and Richard, and will Jesse James make an appearance?

Oh. And I'd also like to know what the characters look like.

Again, forgive my bluntness. I hope this helps.
9
9
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: E | (3.0)
Hello Ryan.

This is my first time reviewing your work, but I hope you've read my other reviews and have and idea on how I do it. Straight to the point, before I do line-editing.

1. Your title is supposed to be "The Lonely Canary: Story" instead of Lonel, right? Or is it intentional?

2. One thing must be clear. "its" means "belongs to it" while "it's" means "it is". You got it wrong throughout the passage.

3. Now, this may sound rude and rough, but your story isn't a story at all. It isn't even a vignette. Others said you've written "great/vivid descriptions", but to me, they're just a comprehensive inventory of consecutive actions. What do I mean by this? An example:

The clock strikes 7 a.m. The alarm goes off. John wakes up, stretches, and gets out of bed. He stands up, slips his right hand under his shorts, and scratches his crotch. He takes his hand out and then straightens his bed. He stretches again and walks to the door. He turns the knob and walks out of the opened the door. John then goes to the toilet, turns the knob to open the door, and walks in.

So the passage above tells us a little about John. He wakes up on time, he's a right-hander, he doesn't mind scratching his private parts (hell, he's alone. Who cares?), and he's a neat person. But is this a story? No. Is this a vignette? No. It's just a series of actions that leads us nowhere. Well, to the toilet, but that's beside the point. In prose (just as in poetry), every word, every description counts. Everything has to have a purpose, a meaning.

So this is your whole story: Lew is wet, and fumbles with his keys because it's dark outside. Gets in, walks straight to the kitchen to get some booze, and notices the house is dark. Not only dark, but empty. He plays around with fridge-magnets. Then somehow he thinks of the canary beside the entrance. He's already in the kitchen. He didn't notice the bird when he entered? It didn't make any noise then? Anyway, he then sits in the dark and the cold because he can't be bothered switching the light and heater on. He thinks about the cleaning ladies. The storm is still rampaging outside, but Lew sits listening to the canary working up a frenzy, and watches a mouse eating his biscuit crumbs. He sits, and cries.

1678 words compressed into 124 words (including comments). Ask yourself this: is there a story behind those 1678 words? Do you really need to put in all those sequential actions? You're a poet. You know you have to evoke powerful emotions and imagery using the least words possible. Why squander word counts on unnecessary stuff?

Lew is lonely, but clearly he isn't always alone. His home used to house his family. But where are they now? That's your story. Why is Lew alone? What happened to his family? Start asking yourself "What if...?" You can begin the story with Lew alone at home, in 2 or 3 paragraphs at most. Then flashback mid-scene to a full house, where everything is fine, the house full of life. Then something happens. Something bad. Then end the story with the present, the canary thrashing in its cage, struggling to escape, but trapped and alone, a metaphor for Lew's life. Then Lew bows his head and cries while the canary wails, waiting for the door to open, to welcome somebody home.

Well, that's my suggestion, but what's important is that you have to start asking yourself questions. What made Lew lonely in the first place? Not what Lew does first, second, third, and so on.

Now, for the line-editing:

* * * * *


It was dark and he couldn’t find the key-hole to his front door. Barely able to figure out which key was which, he was forced to feel through his ring to find the hexagonal shaped head with the single edged pattern. After finding the deadbolt he proceeded to jab with the tip of the key until he found the hole; it was raining and the key kept slipping. Entering soaking wet, Lew got out of his jacket as quick as he could and rubbed the beaded droplets of water from his slickly pomaded hair with a scarf that was hanging loosely (you can do without both adverbs) from the coat rack to his left. Brushing off the sweater he was wearing, he decided to take that off as well (three times you say the same thing. brushing off, was wearing, taking that off): he hated feeling wet. After calming himself from the rush in doors, and the irritability of being rained on (again, repetition: he hated feeling wet, then 'irritability of being rained on), he paraded (awkward, ill-suited verb) into the kitchen to fix himself a strong drink. It was habit working for him up until this point , ; the routine order of things after he walked through the door , it never changed. He slowed his pace as he walked down the hallway, beginning to notice that none of the lights were on; the house was completely dark, almost pitch black. It left him feeling dismal for a moment, with the panic-stricken sense that he had forgotten about something. Before two years ago, he had never been the first one home , ; the lights were always on when he came through that door, there were always voices in the air, and laughter , but now, . Now there was only a chilling silence , that echoed off the walls. Every footfall was emphasized, every breathe breath punctuated by its effort, the sound of a sigh that would normally go unfelt , now rattled about his rib cage with discomfort before falling dead on the floor. It must of (remember, must have, should have, would have, and not must of, should of, would of) must have had something to do with the storm raging outside, he figured, and the darkness as a result. Still, he thought, without the lights on, and without sun beaming through the windows . Something , something still didn’t add up. He had lost something, and he felt very cold.

There was no message left on the table, or on the answering machine , ; no sign of anything unnatural, actually, just vacancy (personal opinion: though they mean the same thing, 'emptiness' conveys a stronger emotional impact, while vacancy conveys a sense of unoccupied space). He found the bottle of whiskey he was searching for in the cupboard above the microwave, then poured it straight, just over a lime because there was no ice ready. This was a sad compromise. (is this whole segment in bold needed? You can do without) Sipping from the glass without any expression either give him an expression or lose it altogether), he arranged the magnetic word cut-outs on his fridge into a playful poem that read: "Water is leaking on the flood plane and the spoon my father gave isn’t big enough to dig me out of this mud'. - It can be tough sometimes. There aren’t many words to choose from, so you're forced to be creative, and there is only one 'me' cut-out left, which is almost impossible to work with. (tense and PoV confusion. Keep it in third person, and change it to past tense. Not everyone has these magnetic cutouts on their fridge, so you can't generalize it. Plus it comes off as awkward, these 2 sentences.) Lew looked at the fridge for a while, studying any other opportunities to superimpose a better word. He ended up spending much more time trying to find problems with the insignificant little poem than it actually took him to piece it together. It was as satisfying as it was going to get, he figured, so he left it. (meandering; I don't see the point in this.) Feeling a minor sense of accomplishment, he continued to sip from the rock-glass as he leaned against the island counter-top in the middle of the kitchen. Thinking of nothing in particular {either he's thinking of something, or lose this altogether. Plus, the whole sentence is hanging and incomplete), just trying to feel the whiskey burn as it slid off his tongue and down the back of his throat.

There's a Canary that sits perched (perch is a form of sitting, so it's redundant. Again, tense confusion. Whole story is in past tense, so keep it that way. Suggestion: use "perched" instead of the whole highlighted bit.) in a fancy, antique cast-iron cage, in the bonus room in the front of the house, right beside the entrance (redundant. "right beside the entrance" is enough). It was never really his Canary until now, and he never really cared for it much. That's not to say he didn’t take care of it, because he did. He fed and watered it and cleaned its cage regularly. He just never had much love for the little bird. It was sort of a left-over, a remnant of the past which, to Lew, always served as a vivid reminder. It was often too difficult for him to hear the Canary sing it's pretty songs, because they no longer held their beauty. What he remembered of the way it used to sing, so joyous when anybody would walk through the door, it could liven up the entire house like a rain forest. (the whole sentence is confusing. I think you meant this: He remembered the way it used to sing, so joyous when anybody walked through the door. It livened up the entire house like a rain forest.) Now, it just seemed sad. It sits sat on it's perch and cries almost (almost what?), staring at the doorway, just waiting for a friendly face to enter, and the only one that ever walks walked through is was a stranger's (now this is a good point for your story. If Lew has been here for years, and has been feeding it, why is he a stranger to the canary?).

The lights were still off , ; he didn’t bother turning them on. It didn’t really matter to him at this point. He never touched the thermostat anymore : ; the temperature didn't bother him as much. He never cooked, or cleaned in the past, and he didn't feel the desire to do so now. If he ever bought groceries, they would always be something he could eat out of the box, much like the Entenmann's he was pulling out from the pantry now. Mostly, he dined out. There was a small fish-and-chips place around the corner from his house where he ate frequently. It was a small place, family-run, with great home-style food, but it never got a considerable amount of business due to it's 'cash only' policy (is there a point to how business is for the shop-owners? Does it move the story?). Lew had a cleaning lady that came in on Thursdays, so he never needed to so much as tidy up. He'd been through two different Korean ladies already, and one Portuguese. It had nothing to do with their ethnicity, however but he was certain they had been taking things, especially prescriptions from his medicine cabinet. He never blamed them, though : . They never charged much money, and he figured their situation was a desperate one linked to their immigration status, which he was convinced was illegal (again, does this have anything to do with the story?). There were a few toys that had been left behind, and Martina (the current cleaning lady) would place any she'd found on the living room buffet, where they would wait and stare at Lew while he sat alone in his chair in the evenings. At one point in the past, Lew had become upset enough to throw them out of the room and into the next - one having broken a mirror. This had happened on a Wednesday night, so when he came home the next day, the mirror had been removed, and the toys had been placed back on the buffet.

The storm still raged beyond the shutters, it's shadow looming hesitantly upon the drapes. With every flash of lightning, within every frightening moment of white illumination, Lew expected to see the silhouette of a person's face and upper torso appear, hovering just outside the living room window. In a mystical way, he did see a face, staring back at him from the reflection in the double-pane, storm-proof glass : , pressing it's judgment. He watched the window for that face and at the tree which swung low and hard against the house, being thrown around in the violence of the wind, clattering it's branches off the eaves-troughs. This alarmed the Canary and it voiced itself frantically as it flew around in it's cage looking for an escape. There is no exit for you, little Canary, Lew thought. He watched the window and drank from his glass which had been filled up for the third time now. Dostoevsky's "The Idiot" sat untouched on the coffee table, next to an empty pack of Marlboro Reds and a green lighter. Picking up this pack of cigarettes, hoping there was one left, he slid off the cardboard sleeve, then threw the box back onto the table in disappointment. He played with the green lighter for a while, fascinating himself with the depth of the orange flame, emptying the vaporous fuel into his closed hand, then bursting it into a short-lived inamorata (Lew may be fascinated, but I'm not). The lighter ran dead eventually, then that too he threw back on the table. As he sat now with his arms tightly crossing his chest, slouched over in his chair, neck drooping at a mild arch as he stared at his lap (awkward and overly long), he heard the quiet scampering of something crossing his floor. It was a mouse he noticed, once he raised his head. A small house mouse : , dirty with a greyish tinge. It carried a surprisingly large cracker in its mouth, which looked like one of the Entenmann's he had been eating earlier; he must of dropped on the floor , he figured. The mouse stopped in the middle of this daring exposure and looked in Lew's direction. With the cracker still in it's mouth, paused, the mouse began to nibble at the lost wafer. For a moment Lew found himself puzzled, with questions crossing his mind , like: Does it not notice me? Does it notice that it's presence doesn’t bother me? Is it taunting me somehow? I wonder if I am just not that threatening?. Too many questions, he thought, and left it alone. So this The mouse continued to eat the wafer until it was fully devoured , . Then , it left in the same direction it came from ; , probably to find more.

He sat , looking at his lap, with his shirt untucked, wondering what his life has had amounted too, but there was no answer. He sat, looking at his lap, listening to the storm rage and to the yellow Canary sing it's sad songs. This rain forest had burnt itself down long ago, he thought, and why he should be reminded of it , well- . Well, he knew the reason for this punishment would continue to elude him. He sat, arms crossing his chest and in silence he cried for a very long time. The tears that streamed down his salt-stained cheeks , were given no supplication, and as his throat quivered, not a sound could escaped his lips. The Canary continued to sing, it's vibrancy filling the emptiness of it's matte black cage, waiting on for the door to open to welcome somebody home.

* * * * *



You write better than some of those I've come across on this site. In fact, if you find your focus, you can whip this into a good story. But that's it. You need a story, and not a list of meandering actions. That's the reason for the 3.0, and not less.

Hope this helps. Remember, ask yourself, "What happened?" and "What if...?"
10
10
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
Hello Ben,

You like writing irony, don't you? Most of your short stories have a sense of irony and/or poetic justice at the end. Sick, twisted, but funny at the same time. Somehow, this story reads exactly the same as Laura's "Afternoon at the CarnivalOpen in new Window.. Though both stories are worlds apart (pun intended), the usage of Omniscient Third-Person PoV, the light, jolly air to the storyline, everything reminds me of a typical TV advertisement in the 50s (or is it 60s?). I can't explain the exact point that makes both stories read the same, but it's there. I can even hear an advertisement jingle in the background while reading both stories.

That being said, the use of Omniscient Third Person may work to your advantage or against you. This story feels like it belongs to Children's Story genre. With that in mind, I think http://www.samsdotpublishing.com/beyondguide.htm is a possible venue. However, I'm not so sure about adult sci-fi venues. It's not emotionally engaging, due to the lack of a central perspective.

Obviously throwing the winkles into the sea is an integral part of the story. But having PnJ lunch and having a family conversation about not swimming until at least an hour post lunch, or arguing about walking against driving, or showing Mom preparing for dinner, how do they contribute the story? The way I see it, I assume you wanted to show a typical, normal human family interaction, as opposed to the introduction of the aliens at the end of the story. They don't do anything to move the story. Hey, I think that's one of the major similarities between your story and Laura's!


Other than italicizing Becky's thought process, the prose looks clean. Not sure if peanut butter and jelly sandwich is written as it is, or as 'peanut-butter-and-jelly sandwich' though.

Seriously. Try Beyond Centauri. They pay $6 per story, with a maximum length of 2500 words. There is a lesson in this story. Well, watch where you winkle. Oh. And that we think we're superior, and we can get away with doing bad things because the victims 'will be fine, they don't feel a thing', but who knows, there are others who will do the same to us. I know I can say there's plenty of room to expand the alien part, but as it is, with minimal descriptions, and no show of implications of throwing Dad and then Sam onto the beach (you even made it obscure), the story's more horrifyingly funny. So my opinion for the ending is to not spell it out. You're twisted. I like.



* * * * *


“Sam, don’t throw the snails in the bay! They’ll die.” Becky whacked her brother on the head with the palm of her hand.

“Ouch! Don’t be stupid. They’re not snails, they’re called periwinkles, and they don’t die. They live underwater. Stop hitting me! I’ll tell Mom.” Sam turned his back on her, but scooted a safe distance away on the dock. He plucked another of the dark spiral periwinkles off of the wooden ladder which disappeared down below the surface. Extending his arm back, he threw it and watched as the tiny shell skipped over the waves and finally sank.

Becky stuck her tongue out at him and ran back up onto the grass. She didn’t really know if it hurt the periwinkles to land out into the deep water, but it still seemed mean. What did they ever do to you? italicize this she thought.

“Becky, Sam, time for lunch,” Mom called out from the porch of the beach house where they were staying.

Becky ran in and started telling her mother what Sam had been doing. “Sam’s throwing those snails, I mean winkles, into the water again. He’s so mean.”

“Don’t worry, dear, the periwinkles will be fine. Eat up. We’re going to Risser’s Beach this afternoon, and you know you can’t swim until an hour after you eat.”

“Catherine’s dad says that’s just a myth.” Becky spoke with her mouth full of peanut butter and jelly sandwich. “He says you can’t really get cramps from swimming too soon after eating.”

“Well, then, Catherine’s dad can let Catherine swim before one hour, but we have our own rules.” Mom bustled about the kitchen cutting up meat, carrots and potatoes to throw into the crock pot where they would simmer until dinner, filling the house with wonderful aromas as it cooked. “Where is Sam?” She called for him again out the back door. “Boys,” she muttered to herself, shaking her head. Just then Sam ran in, breathing hard. He plopped down at the table and grabbed his sandwich.

After lunch, Becky and Sam and their parents, staggering a bit under the load of swim towels, beach chairs, inflatable rafts and other necessities, headed down the road to Risser’s Beach. As usual, Sam complained. With an eight year-old's logic he asked, “Why can’t we just drive?" It’d be so much faster.”

“Sam, it’s only two hundred yards. You're a big boy, hurry on ahead and find us the best spot.” Dad grinned as he spoke. He was carrying the most, but was cheerful as always. Becky looped her arm through his and skipped along in the sunshine. The beach was her favorite place to go.

While Mom and Dad laid out towels for her and Sam, and set up beach chairs for themselves, Becky and Sam ran into the waves. It was a beautiful day, and there were lots of other kids around. Becky’s friend, Catherine, was splashing about among the shallow waves. When she saw Becky, she called out, “Let’s build a sandcastle.” The two girls ran up onto the hot sand and started to dig, first with their hands, then with small plastic shovels provided by Mom.

Meanwhile, Dad joined Sam in the water, and the two went out until the water was almost up to Sam’s neck. Sam was learning to swim, although it mostly looked like splashing to Becky. She watched them for a minute, then returned to her digging.

-------------------------------



“Vreesh, don’t throw the skolenids onto the beach! They’ll die.” Ikini whacked her brother on the head with her tentacle.

“Ouch! Don’t be stupid. They’re not skolenids. We're on Earth, silly, and these are humans. And they don’t die, they live on dry land. Stop that! I’ll tell Mom.” Vreesh flipped onto his back and wiggled his eyestalks at her. He swam over and grabbed another wriggling human, this one much smaller than the first. Rearing back, he cast it as far as he could, watching it land, then tumble across the sand until it finally lay still.

* * * * *


Plum: Becky's perspective.
Indigo: Mom's perspective.
Khaki: Dad's perspective.

note: Sam's and the aliens' perspective are also there, but too obscure and subtle, that they can pass as narration.


Seriously. Now I can't get that jingle out of my head.

Argh!
11
11
Review of Star Mail  Open in new Window.
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (3.0)
Hello Light!

First of all, welcome to "Let's Publish! Discuss and TalkOpen in new Window.!

Second, I'm very outspoken and opinionated, but Raven will always claim she's worse than me. So, before I jump in, I'm going to say sorry!

OK. I actually dig the concept of your story. Extraterrestrial communication through a houseplant. Snapping pictures that record auras of living beings. However, half your story reads like the lines were ripped off Annual Physics Journal and the other half reads like the conversation between sock hand-puppets on Sesame Street. Before I go into details, lemme see if I get the story right.

Henry is a boy-genius. At ten, he's working with high-voltage electricity for an experiment that captures auras emanated by a houseplant. At ten, I was busy playing with MASK action figures (Condor's my favorite), and at 13, I was learning to play Mortal Kombat on the PC. Back to Harry. He gets it from his father, who encourages him and nudges him forward. He enters a Science Fair, but his experiment is too far-fetched and doesn't seem to have any practical potential, so he only gets the most unusual experiment award.

Henry doesn't want to give up. He works on it, and one day he stumbles upon some white noise, which, after almost three years of experimentation, turns out to be digital transmission. So he enlists his classmate Brenda to help out, maybe to spice the story up a little, to make Henry more...human. Eventually he manages to decode parts of the transmission, and learns how to transmit messages of his own.

All of a sudden, a fully understandable message patches through, dumbed down because of the abysmal level of human understanding. The message tells that humans are still too primitive to accept that there are much more intelligent lifeforms out there. All the people who heard the message laugh it off and don't believe a word of it. Brenda's mom, being gracious, advises Henry to re-enter the Science Fair, just to get a kick out of it. Henry, being Henry, is even more obsessed and wants to continue experimenting.

So. Did I get the story right?

I would have liked the concept more if it's about the plants themselves turn out to be sentient beings. This message-from-intelligent-alien routine has been overplayed and overused.

Now. On to the structure itself. With all honesty, the only fluid and convincing part of this prose is the decoded message from the alien life form.

This is how you've written your story:

“What are those little boxes on the end of the little round sticks, Henry?” Brenda asks as they walk up to the tree.

“They are pick-ups for local interference. What they pick up goes to noise canceling circuits. Properly adjusted, it takes the place of a Faraday chamber. Those adjustments took me the most of a day.”

“How does the receiver work, Henry?”

“I charge the coils in the yoke with 100,000V DC. Then, I pass current through the coils, creating a strong magnetic field, and I add a 10 Hz signal to the current passing through the coils as a mild agitator. A pick-up coil samples the current passing through the coils in the yoke. What is left after the noise-canceling circuits and the 10 Hz signal is my signal, I hope.”

“Well, Henry, I’ll have to wait and see how it works.”

“That sounds fair, Brenda.”

The two of them return to the workshop. Henry connects his digital recorder to the receiver’s control panel and begins starting up the receiver. Brenda looks through a small window in the back of the workshop to check on the tree.

When the receiver is completely up and running, Henry checks an indicator on the control panel. After a few moments, he says, “There is something.”

Brenda looks over at Henry, sees him make an adjustment on the control panel, and then quickly start the recorder.

“What was something, Henry?”

“I have a gauge that reads receiver output in the frequency range of the signal I am looking for. I had the gain too high. I adjusted the signal strength and I just recorded a little over a second of it. Now, I will play it back, slowed down.”

He plays back the recording, and says, “It sounds like the same signal I was picking up before. Now, I will download the signal into my computer and analyze it.”


Henry hooks up the recorder to his computer and downloads the recording to the audio processor application.

Brenda looks back at the oak tree for a moment, and then looks back and watches Henry. Henry is looking very intensely at his computer screen. She asks, “What does your computer say, Henry?”

After a few more moments he responds, “That’s the signal, loud and clear.”

“So, what are you going to do now?”

“I am going to download a large sample of the signal from the new receiver onto an external drive. I will then continue to decode it, Brenda.”

“I wish you luck, Henry.”

“Thanks, Brenda.”


I don't mean to be rude, but compare the passage I've highlighted with this:


Right Sock: Hey, Left Sock. What are you doing?

Left Sock: I am making instant noodle, Right Sock.

Right Sock: Golly, Left Sock. How do you do it?

Left Sock: It's easy, Right Sock. First you tear open the package, and dump the content into a bowl. Remember, Right Sock, to use a microwave oven-safe container. Then, sprinkle the seasonings you find in the package, and pour water about half the container. Put it in the microwave, make sure you cover it with a thin film first, and set the microwave oven to four minutes.

Right Sock: Sounds complicated, Left Sock.

Left Sock: Actually, Right Sock, it is quite simple.

Right Sock: Golly, Left Sock. You're so smart.

Left Sock: It's ready, Right Sock! Come on, dig in!


First of all, at the very least, lose the repetitive names (bold), because there are only 2 of them there, and they know each other's names. When you talk with your significant other, family member or friend, do you keep repeating one another's names? Try it. I'm sure it gets annoying after the third time your name is mentioned in the conversation. OK. I get that Henry's a kid-genius and is way too focused on his experiments than is healthy. But, genius kids are still kids, and they usually talk like kids. They're bored because other people cannot catch up with their train of thoughts, but they also know when to dumb things down (usually for the benefit of their parents). From the way Henry talks, I'm guessing he has autism as well. Keep him focused, because that's who Henry is, but make him human.

From the detailed explanations (in green), I'm guessing either you're well-versed in this field, or you've done extensive research, or you ripped off a textbook or journal and pasted whole sentences into your story (that's the Malaysian way, much to my chagrin). Attention to detail is applauded in fiction writing, infodump on pet interest isn't. Plus, the way you put it, it's like a criminal mastermind in cheap action movies revealing his master plan in detail, and then he either pulls it off or gets foiled. Show it in action. Lose the details that will make layman readers lose interest. Dumb things down a little for Brenda (and for the readers), because we can't catch up. I skipped a lot of those infodump and read the conversations in between.

The characters are all caricatures, with no depth, no layer, no life. Flesh them out, make them real. Watch movies about kid geniuses, read stories about them. Watch "Pinky and the Brain". Pinky has more depth and character than Brain does.

I won't go into the little details, the typos and grammatical flaws. These major issues need addressing first.

Most books on writing have character development and dialogue sections. I suggest reading them. Sol Stein's books are good ("Stein on Writing" and "How to Grow A Novel"). There are also books specifically for characters and dialogues. I gather you love writing. Think of the books as investments. Trust me, they've helped me a lot.

The story can be tightened a lot, and it needs emotions, human reactions, and human interaction. Storyline-wise, I would still have preferred the plant themselves talking (and not only to complain how humans are destroying the planet or oppressing plant life).

You love Sci-Fi, right? Then you must have watched Avatar. The storyline's not original. A stranger enters a tribe, initially to learn about them, but end up falling in love with them and siding them when things get ugly. "Dances with Wolves" and "Pocahontas" have the same premise. However, because of the richness of storytelling, the attention to detail in describing a complete, living world, the finesse of character development, people don't actually mind the tree-hugging message openly hidden in the story. I personally felt like crying when Hometree fell. I then imagined all the trees felled in the name of progress.

Learn from such master storytellers.

I hope this helps.

And again, sorry for being so blunt and opinionated.
12
12
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: 18+ | (2.5)
Hello First Light/Yuen/Liew Xiang Xiang,

It's taken me a long time to process this piece to give an objective review. While technically and grammatically good, the content itself is somewhat questionable for an academic essay. Stylistically, the piece has an almost story-telling voice, a lecture, until you splash (and I might say ruin) the essay with 'fuck' all around. I'll touch more on that later.


Structural observation

It does feel a bit all over the place. You start off fine. By using the banana analogy, Western people will be interested to read more. Then you touch a bit on Malaysian and their multilingual culture, with English as your favorite medium. After that, a bit of an ego-tripping, stating how good you are using English as compared to most of your peers. Nothing wrong with it; it just gives me the impression that you're more than proud you're good at it. It establishes that this whole piece is personal, it's about you (or should I say it's a meme).

You spent a long paragraph on how you fell in love with English, and how it led you to wanting to be a writer. This is good, you let the readers in and know you better. You become more sympathetic to us.

For someone quite eloquent, you love using 'despise', don't you? I keep on running into the word.

Back to the point. You turn the piece around by saying you suddenly fall in love with Chinese language and literature (by the way, Chinese is broad. Why not be more specific? Mandarin, Cantonese, Hakka, and such?). And I think you can make it better by implying that while English (and Malay) is quite simple, Chinese is far more complicated due to its phonetic quality (a word with the same spelling may mean something different depending how you pronounce and intone it) and the different characters used.

You had a chance to elaborate on how Malaysians mangle and mash languages together into Manglish. You could have used this to strengthen your point on how confused you are as a result, or how it affects your written and spoken English. Instead you gave it a few lines and spent the rest of the paragraph about yourself.

You start citing other people after 1/3 along the way. Only now does it have a semblance of an academic discourse. But this is where your writing starts to unravel. All this while you're talking about choosing between Chinese and English. Suddenly you're citing writing and the nature of writing, not the natures of English and Chinese.

"In short, whenever we write, we seek to produce a change in how our audience thinks or behaves."

When did this piece change from a discussion on linguistic choice to a lecture about writing, about how writing can influence the way the general population think? Then you talk about Westernization of the world, Westernization of yourself. You talk about how you became a fan of the American Dream.

But wait. You snap the piece around again by saying how Westernization doesn't suit you. Where did this come from? Now it's about your name, how it's structured, how you despise the effect it has on you. It's no longer about choosing between Chinese and English, it's no longer about the influence, the power of writing, but about how names can bring about an identity crisis.

"Every time I write my name backwards, in the wrong way, I feel like I'm dying a little inside. I think of English as my language...and yet my language is rejecting me and my personal identity. I don't belong to English; English does not belong to me. "

Again, where did this come from? All this while you're talking about how you love English, how it feels natural to you, how great you are at it compared with the rest of your countrymen, and suddenly due to the nature your name is structured (surname last), you no longer feel English is suitable for you. What gives?

Now you talk about being rejected everywhere, and not belonging anywhere. And the piece becomes angst-ridden. You're suddenly angry at everyone, when the whole piece is about you, and no one else. And you throw about the word 'fuck', which, I must say, reflects poorly on your character. In fiction as well as in non-fiction, 'fuck' is a strong word. Other curse-words don't even come close. Imagine reading classic stories like Little Women or Robinson Crusoe or even one of your beloved Enid Blyton books, and finding a single 'fuck' in it. Not many, just one. Your view of the whole story changes. In most books about writing, we are advised to use the word sparingly if at all, because the word reflects the writer. It's hard to find the word in a literary piece. Commercial novels, yes. Genre novels, yes. But not literary novels. I may be wrong here, but I strongly advise against using it for this essay. You can bring home your argument another way.

The ending, though powerful, is not convincing. You talk about not belonging, how you're confused and out of place, but you suddenly close with how you're at peace with yourself. There is no description on how you reach that epiphany.


Content observation

I'm not lying when I say it's a meme piece. From your portrayal, even readers in our group may think you're somewhat a special case among Malaysians. When I was in Secondary School, most of my friends were Chinese, and most of them are bananas. They can understand Cantonese and speak it, but they can't read Chinese script, and they can only write their names, nothing else. Some can't even speak Cantonese, much less Mandarin. Although I'm fluent in both Malay and English, my friends call me overripe banana because I don't think and act like a typical Malay. My Indian friends in university and at work, they can't even speak Tamil. Just good English and Malay (something about educated Malaysian Indians...they're more willing to abandon their mother tongue than the Chinese community).

Throughout my schooldays, I've brought home annual awards for the best in English and sometimes Malay examinations. At 10 years old I corrected my English teacher (she used past tense after 'to'). I was one of the 3 students my batch who got an A1 for 1119 English (British Standard), the other two Chinese. Do I see myself as special? I used to, especially when I started writing short stories. But then I realized my writings were atrocious (not to my English teachers back then. They were so proud). I used to think using Manglish a sin, and my friends made fun of my proper English (with the slang and all, which I deny having). This is why I can understand where you stand, your take on life with this essay. I used to be like you. Didn't belong anywhere, always out of place. But then I started appreciating Manglish, and I love how Malaysian it is. It's giving language purists unending nightmares, though. I also started to write with Malaysian flavor in mind. My characters are either Malay, Chinese or Indian. They kiss the back of an elder's hand. They use ringgit (or RM) instead of dollar. They use baju kurung and cheongsam. I don't even bother explaining what I mean by those 'foreign' languages. Do they cause confusion? I know for a fact they do (Tania's review on The Good Deed is proof enough). Am I limiting my readership to Malaysians only? I doubt it. My characters may speak perfect English, as you've pointed out reviewing Stormcaller, but their culture is Malaysian. This is me embracing Malaysia in my English usage, penetrating the Western market. So if I write a similar essay with this whole paragraph as my points, your closing line will make more sense, because there is a development arc. First there's pride, then there's confusion, then understanding, followed by acceptance, and finally the emergence of a distinct identity. Not just loving English, then Chinese, then back to English, then how writing shapes the world, and how Westernization affects how people think, and how structuring names is a violent act (passive aggressive), and how since you don't feel you belong, fuck everyone. I feel like Ben's Got it? I kept on summarizing your points.

So here's my argument (as if all this while it isn't). Is this you being rejected, or you rejecting the world? You say you die a little inside every time you have have to structure your name backward, yet your identity in WDC is First Light/Yuen (the introductory line with the multiple names was intentional - a gun on the mantelpiece in Act I should go off in Act III. This is Act III). So who are you? My mom worked for an American company. Her colleagues in Western countries used to call her 'Mrs. Tahir', but she corrected them, saying Tahir is her father, and her name is Aishah. Her correspondents called her Puan Aishah or Aishah there on. Point is, you may have to write your surname first, but you can always correct others. The Chinese are even more interesting. I take one of my best friends for instance. His name is Fong Kean Khang, Fong being his surname. He writes his name either this way, or Fong KK, or KK Fong. We call him Kean Khang, but during formal occasions, he's Dr Fong. That is how the Chinese use their name. When it's formal, they use their surname. Most of the time, they introduce themselves (even informally) using their surname because it's much easier to remember, and because their first name is reserved for family and close friends. By the way, he's a banana and he looks at a patient blankly when they talk to him in Mandarin.

You yourself admit that it's easier for you to have your characters Caucasian, because you're writing in English. This is you rejecting your culture, this is you trying to Westernize yourself. You also say your country rejects you. How is this so, when you received the same education as I did, having the same opportunities as I do? Where is your fact to support your argument? Malaysians, regardless the race, receive the same education. Indians and Chinese have their own special schools because their parents don't want their children growing up forgetting their roots, their language, their particular culture. There is no 'Malay' school. Standard schools don't count. Malaysia celebrates all special occasions regardless the race and religion. We have official holidays for Raya, for Chinese New Year, for Taiphusam, for Deepawali, for Christmas. Not many countries do the same. You may say Chinese children have a difficult time getting into local universities. I know a lot of local-grad people. I know a lot of people studying overseas and coming back. I also know a lot of Malays who aren't eligible to enroll in local universities but can't afford the private ones (dominant race is Chinese there), much less going overseas.

You are Malaysian even though you're a full-blooded Chinese. You're smearing your country's name by saying it rejects you. Where is your sense of pride and belonging to where you're born, where you received your education, where you got to learn English and Chinese (and Malay) at the same time, free from being forced to choose either one?

This is a personal rant and not an essay. Your citation is about writing, and not about the English language, or the Chinese, not about the clashing (and blending) of cultures, and most of your points are personal views and opinions instead of factual, academic discussions.

You got one thing right, though. Words are weapons. Now everyone who reads this, who aren't aware of how things are at home, may think that Malaysia is a bad country, and however bad America is to you, it's a lesser evil. All because you reject your roots.

I truly am sorry if this has become personal. Your essay is personal, but it is prejudiced by your view. Maybe with trimming you'll get to publish this. But at what price? People back home who may encounter this in print will think that you don't appreciate growing up in Malaysia, you don't appreciate how you manage to study abroad. While you're simply Asian in America, your background and culture not important, back home you're distinctly Chinese (among Chinese you even have a sub-race), with your cultures and your language and your upbringing respected and celebrated. You, like so many others opting to live abroad, fail to see the beauty of Malaysia, of how unique it is. There is no racial assimilation and purging like in Indonesia and Thailand. There is no racial oppression.

I'm sorry if this review isn't at all helpful. I'm sorry I don't agree with your arguments. But this is my advice to you: look deep into yourself and remember yourself, how you're raised. You can assimilate yourself into a Western version of you, or you can bring to light your distinct culture and identity. Writers like Amy Tan and Tash Aw and other 'Asian' authors, they showcase their uniqueness among Westerners. They open windows to the East. You don't need la or ma or adoi to make your stories Malaysian. You can have things like a roadside steamboat stall, or Petaling Street where illegal DVD vendors can hide their wares under one minute flat whenever there's a police raid. You can have your characters stuck in a heavy traffic when they want to go back to Ipoh for the traditional New Year dinner, simply because people of other races take the 2-day holiday opportunity to balik kampung as well. There are so many things here that Americans (or Westerners in general) aren't even aware of.

You can reject who you are, or you can embrace it.

It's your choice.
13
13
Review of Got It?  Open in new Window.
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: 18+ | (3.0)
Hello Ben,

I actually read this story when you first posted it, before Em put it up. Had a good laugh, but I'm still not quite sure how to review this piece. I think today I have a rough idea.


Bad moves in fiction

1. Start a story with 'Dark and stormy night' - Check
2. Have an unreliable narrator - Check, sorta
3. Have a weak, pathetic and totally hopeless protagonist - Check
4. Use mundane real-life dialogues like greetings and such - Check
5. Use lame, lame humor Check
6. Use a condescending narrative voice - Check, sorta
7. Lame/cliched metaphors and similes - Check
8. Unbelievable turn of events - Check
9. Flaccid ending, with no resolution Check
10. Weak plot What plot?

Amusing as it is, this is a novelty piece. It violates almost all the teachings on writing. At least your grammar is good, and the spelling's flawless (more or less). Like a 2nd person PoV piece, getting this one published can get tricky.

However, you can turn this around by using irony or twisted humor. A good example is by spiking the wine with rat poison. The narrator is lame and pathetic, and can't do anything when his wife and best friend are screwing around right under his nose. Or you can have the narrator screw with the best friend's wife. Or, if you're feeling a little kinky, he joins in (scrape that thought!). So at least the story ends with a dark humor, and it serves a purpose, rather than being written for the sake of proving how bad a story can be.

You can also get rid of suddenly getting that money part. Makes the story lose credulity and it doesn't really serve any purpose.

If you intended for the intermittent recaps to be annoying, you've reached your goal. Twice, three times I can stand. But at a regular interval, for a story so short? It got too much.

I know this defeats the purpose of this story, but why not consider revamping this story into something decent, about how a loser of a guy copes with his wife cheating on him with his best friend. I know this story has been told so many times, but not by Ben Langhinrichs.

A group of a thousand writers can have a common premise, but the story can be told in so many different unique ways.


Observations:
1. "Yo! Whassup? - missed the inverted comma.
2. You started with past tense, then moved on to the present.


Anyway, thanks for that...interesting read. By the way, the rating is not because of how bad the story is. I get that it's intended that way. Just that the story meanders without a purpose, without focus. Even a parody of fiction should adhere to the essence of storytelling, not just to make a point. Anyone can write bad. The trick is to make it seem bad, a coat of grime clothing a brilliant diamond.
14
14
Review of Missing you  Open in new Window.
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+ | (4.5)
Was this written for the dialogue-only competition?

For ethereal beings, your characters sure have compelling voices. It's scary how the story turned from an innocent conversation with the memory/ghost of a departed wife to something dark and sinister. For a dialogue-only story, this is almost masterclass.

Some observations:

1. Remember how we used to say that when you tried to hurry us up to go somewhere. 'We're in the car!' we'd yell, and the kids would laugh.

These two sentences feel a bit off and awkward. And you don't need the bold. It's just a gimmick. Suggestion:

Remember when you wanted us to hurry up for trips? We'd yell, "We're in the car." Remember how the kids laughed at that?

He's making it a question, and uses repetition (remember) to show that he's not exactly all right, and he's clinging on to something. He's also answering a question with another question, dodging answering. And it blends with the subsequent line, where Barb sounds desperate.


2. "We're in the car... in the car... and the engine's running... and we're coming to find you, Barb. We're coming to join you. Better open up those arms, now, baby, better open up..."

Maybe it's just me, but that last line is just cheesy. And dirty, no matter how I look at it. I suggest removing the highlighted (bold) part.

You've done good conveying both the characters' distinct voices. I've read three stories from you, and all three read differently. You've got mad skills, mate. Can't wait to read your romance :). Wonder if I'll find turgid, throbbing, tumescent, quivering, clasping, enfolding anywhere in that story.
15
15
Review of Within the Ashes  Open in new Window.
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: ASR | (3.5)
Hello Emerin,

You won't mind if I go ahead and be blunt, right?

Laura's right about this story being reminiscent of Lorien's Nine Lives. However, her piece read like a summary of a whole story, where yours read more like a prologue or the beginning of Chapter 1. In short: an introduction. Incomplete standing as it is. There is no actual storyline or plot here. Just a greater being, a spirit, who's reminiscing about the lives it has led, from darkness to enlightenment, and instead of rebirth, it seeks immortality. Where's the conflict?

By which, I mean your expansion is not about explaining yourself or adding a bit here and there. It seeks immortality, yes? Why not use this current life where the being is at the brink of a revelation, a discovery. You can create obstacles, you can create conflict, and you can choose to end the story with the being finding immortality, dies and gets reborn again, or finds itself within the oblivion of death. So many ways to go.

Some things I observed:

1. I was born; I died, often of my own hand until the cycle gradualized and formed in front of me like a physical track.

- Those two ideas, born and died, are different ideas, and separation using a semicolon is improper.

Suggestion:

{d:rose}I died countless deaths, often at my own hand until the cycle gradualized and formed in front of me like a physical track.

- I'm not so sure about of/at my own hand. Of my own device/doing is correct, but when you use 'hand', 'of' doesn't sound right.


2. That was millenia ago -- hundreds of lives ago.

suggestions:
1. That was millennia -- hundreds of lives -- ago.
2. That was mellinnea ago, hundreds of lifetimes.

Avoid using ago twice.


3. They do not understand that they seek infinite death, without hope of nirvana. And yet it is possible that the blind may lead the seeing, that the fool can teach the wise.

Though grammatically correct, the second sentence doesn't sound quite right.

Suggestion:

They do not understand that they seek infinite death, without hope of nirvana. Still, it is possible that the blind may lead the seeing, that the fool can teach the wise.

Hope this helps.
16
16
Review of Pearl, Maybe  Open in new Window.
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+ | (3.5)
Hello Ben,

You added a few lines, didn't you?

Now, I'm going against Raven's thoughts on the ending. For me it reflects the current state of relationships nowadays. People no longer chase the 'one true love', and romanticism is a luxury not many can afford. People can't have what they search for, they settle with what's in front of them.

Jeremy is more interested in the idea of settling down, rather than who to settle down with. And from Lilac's reaction, she also has the same thoughts.

Marriage is something people want to get done with. It no longer means a lifelong commitment. Personally, I oppose this idea, but we're talking about the world in general here. With this in mind, your ending concept is almost perfect.

However, the whole story feels rushed, even though the pace is slow and steady, and there's no tension that moves the story in a sprint. Confusing, much?

The story is full of narrative summaries:
1. his mother's lecture about taking responsibility.
2. his making a decision after drinking beer.
3. Angela's insistence on getting married.
4. Angela having a car.
5. Lilac's dialogue. It's a total infodump (will elaborate).

That's almost the whole passage, right?

I don't get a chance to get to know Jeremy, to be in his head, in his soggy shoes. I don't get to know what makes him decide to finally man up to Angela, and why he ends up settling for someone else. I don't know what he looks like, what Lilac looks like. I get that it's raining, and from the choice of words, 'bloke', 'flat', I'd say British or Irish, but other than that, there's no sense of place.

In Alison's find, the first few paragraphs are so evocative that you transported me to that sandy dune near the beach. I don't get that same sensory gratification here.

When you first put this up, you asked if you should expand this story. You expanded it, all right, but not the right way. You added more narrative summaries.

This story has a lot of potential, but as it is, it doesn't involve the reader. I don't feel strongly enough toward Jeremy to root for him, to make the ultimate decision along with him. You need to change most of the narrative summaries, if not all, into immediate scenes.

Here's my suggestion. Start the story with his mother berating him. Maybe Jeremy has lost another job. Maybe he's spent his allowance and is asking for more.

As he braves the rain, he can have a flashback to scenes with Angela. How he views the relationship, why he's hesitant about taking it a step further. You can also introduce Lilac in the background, like noticing her coming home when he and Angela are sitting on the couch watching a DVD. Take us to the point where Angela gives him the ultimatum, and he backs away, scared. Then his regret, his need to apologize becomes clearer. Maybe even show he's not obsessed about Angela, just comfortable being around her.

That's just a suggestion. It's your story, your tale.

Oh. About Lilac's infodump dialogue.

“She don’t live here anymore, stupid. She came home from that date with you, crying her fool eyes out, although I can’t see why. After moping for a few days, she got a phone call, and next thing you know, she was all dolled up and going on a cruise with Henri. He’s that French dude who was sniffing around last year ‘fore you showed up. Anyway, she ain’t been back.”

Just try saying this whole thing out loud. Does it sound like a real-life conversation? I know a lot of gossips who yak and yak and yak, but they never talk like a narrative summary. COnsider something like this:

She leaned against the doorframe and crossed her arms, almost sneering at him. "She don't live here anymore, stupid."

"What?"

"She cried her fool eyes out, poor thing. After a date with you." She did not have to point an accusatory finger at him; her chin was doing a superb job at it.

"What did I do?"

"Why you looking at me for? I ain't her mammy. Next thing I know she came out of her room all dolled up and going on a cruis with Henri."

"Who's Henri?" Jeremy felt his hope wilting like the tulips.

"Some French bloke she knew 'fore you showed up. Looking at you, I'm thinking she made the right choice."

Jeremy just stared at her. He started to ask if she was joking, but could see she wasn’t. As he stood there, dripping and forlorn, he had a thought. Taking a chance, he thrust the tulips toward… Pearl, maybe. Or Misty. Something like that.


Something like that.

Sorry if I've gone out of line. Hope this helps. And don't give up on this story. As I said, it reflects the society, and where we're all headed. It has promise.
17
17
Review of Alison's Find  Open in new Window.
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: ASR | (4.0)
Hello Ben,

Sorry for the late re-reviewing.

First, I have to say this: I LOLed when I read Vampyr's review about your aliens. I like the description of the aliens having feathers. Everyone always seems to want aliens to be scaly or slimy or humanoid.

Hmm...so you changed them into avian-like creatures, huh?

Now. On to the actual review. Your story has certainly gained depth and dimension, and the plot is certainly entertaining. However, your story from the aliens' introduction has a different vibe compared to the first part. I can't talk poet, but there's a certain music to Alison's story. Maybe the original alien ending was meant to be jarring, and it succeeded, but the continuation has lost that music.

The first part, I can't write like that. That's your signature style. I'm sure you can give the rest of the story the same Ben Langhinrichs treatment.

I hope you don't mind my copying the whole story and sharing my thoughts in between.


* * * * *



The box looked out of place, wedged in a rocky outcropping overlooking the windswept dune grass. Alison didn't notice it at first, and even when she did, she was too busy pretending to be a seagull to stop and investigate. She soared up to the top of the dunes, then swooped back down in a rush, her bare feet dodging expertly around the sharp blades of grass. She imagined looking down on the island from above, watching for fishing boats with flocks of her friends, diving and shrieking for their share of the catch.

This is what I'm talking about. The gentle, elegant imagery you've woven, it's precious.

Up and down she flew, carried aloft by the boundless energy of youth, and borne earthward again with the relentless pull of gravity. Finally, tired and sweaty, she threw herself down on the hot sand and let the sea breeze blow across her, hidden in the field of stalky grass for only the dragonflies to see. Her attention was once again drawn to the object stuck precariously between the rocks like a small boat doomed to wait for the fickle tide to rise again and set it free.

Alison hopped up, ran to the rocks and inspected the box. It didn't look like much, but it did seem out of place. It was not quite wood, not quite metal, and she wasn't really sure it had any opening, but there were swirls and shapes on the sides. Suddenly, the seagull was gone, and in her place was an intrepid treasure hunter, searching the deepest jungles for ancient artifacts.

The treasure hunter scratched her freckled nose and stared at her find. She tapped the side, and it made a hollow sound. Alison tried to pry the box free, but it was wedged quite firmly, so she crawled around to see the back side, for she was aware that ancient artifacts require careful study. Sure enough, on the back were more markings and a small handle which looked as if it should turn. Despite her jiggling, the handle would not move.

Alison peered at the markings. They didn't appear to be words, and they certainly weren't just decoration. They reminded her of shapes on the architectural drawings her dad would sometimes bring home from the office, where each different shape would mean a door or window or fireplace. It would sound better (and be grammatically correct) with ...shape would mean a door or a window or a fireplace. She traced the markings and the patterns tickled her fingertips. Her eyes grew wide in wonder with wonder? when the handle, so solid before, turned the tiniest bit, all by itself. She gripped the handle, and this time it moved. As it did, three notes sounded from deep inside the box. I think it's safe to end the sentence with 'inside', as you will be repeating the word 'box' immediately after this. Twice.

"A music box!" Alison gasped. Her grandmother had a music box consider replacing it with 'one' which she kept tucked away in a drawer, and last summer she had let Alison turn the handle and play "Pachelbel's Canon" take Raven's advice on this. When referring to music or books, the format is usually like this: Stephen King's The Stand; Jason Walker's Down. until the repetition drove everybody crazy. Alison wondered what tune this one might play, but despite her efforts, the handle would only turn that same tiny amount and play those same three notes, which just weren't enough to tell.

Frustrated, Alison considered giving up on being a treasure hunter and running back over the dunes to the beach to see if her older brother, Tim, would help her search for interesting driftwood. Better and clearer this time round. The driftwood becomes a distraction that doesn't call attention onto it. Then she remembered how busy Tim had been earlier, collecting mussel shells and stomping on them, and decided it was better not to bother him. She looked again at the markings, and noticed that some were smaller than others, and that the shapes seemed to grow in a pattern across the sides of the box. She traced the smallest marking first, then each of the larger marks in order, then back down again. Nothing seemed to happen, but when she grasped the handle, it turned further this time, playing an eerie but intriguing tune that she didn't remember hearing before.

Alison traced the marks again, this time going from smaller to larger with the circular marks first, then the rectangles, and finally the squiggly triangles, patiently sorting out the different shapes and sizes. When she did this, a snapping sound came from inside the box; consider a period here. The two ideas aren't parallel to each other, but a consequence of the earlier action Alison was afraid she might have broken something. She waited a moment, but nothing further happened,consider a period, and lose the 'so'. It gives emphasis that nothing happened. so she reached out and grasped the handle again. Now it turned effortlessly, with the full tune playing out across the field, rising and falling with a melody that was strange,lose the comma but somehow compelling. It wasn't as pretty as Pachelbel's "Canon", as above but Alison kept playing it, turning and turning the handle. She only stopped when she heard her mother calling her for lunch.

Remembering that even treasure hunters get hungry, Alison hurried back across the sand. The wind was picking up, and she didn't notice that the little box kept playing its tune, even though she was no longer there to turn its small handle.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Captain! Captain! We have received a continuous alert signal from one of our A-S probes in the Y27 galaxy." The private was slightly breathless and had clearly rushed to be the first to report the news. Feathered ridges on both sides of his head pulsed and rippled, signaling his extreme excitement and agitation.

The captain had heard enough false alarms to be wary, but when he ordered the signal played back, he had to admit it sounded real. He reflected for a moment on how close he had come to retiring this year, and silently thanked Azorni that he had waited. Looking around at his crew, he smiled and raised a feathered blue arm.

"Notify the fleet commander that our Awareness-Seeker probe may have detected alien intelligence, and we are leading an expedition to eliminate the threat." As one, the ridges of his crew started to pulse with his, feathered arms raised in assent, and the odor of battle was thick in the air. After a moment of silence, the crew scattered to battle stations. The Starship Tyrannid IV was made ready to fulfill its destiny.

To a certain degree, I agree with Raven. Having aliens with the same ranking system is odd. However, you only dedicate three paragraphs for this part. The aliens are just cameos. To introduce a whole new system (more than what's already presented), would distract readers from the story, which is about Alison finding the weird box. It's OK to have a familiar system, so readers take it at face value and don't give it more than attention then they should. It's enough that readers know the aliens are feathery and perceive other sentient beings as a threat.

You do get when I say this section reads and feels differently than the first part, right? Not because of the aliens, but the flow of language, the cadence itself.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Alison waited, trying not to show her impatience. Telling her brother about the music box might have been a mistake, but she really wanted to show off her discovery. Now, she had to wait while Tim thought about following her back over the dunes, deciding whether it was "worth bothering." Finally, with an exaggerated shrug, Tim relented, "Alright, Strunk and White, The Elements of Style, p 39: Properly written as two words--all right. I'll come see your dumb music box."

Alison turned to lead Tim to her find, but he ran ahead and was up and over the hill before she could catch up. She chased after, yelling, "Wait for me!" By the time she caught up, Tim were was examining the music box, which kept playing and playing the eerie tune. He wrestled to lift the object, but it wouldn't budge. Suddenly, do you need 'suddenly'? You could get rid of the adverb if it's not essential. Tim picked up a loose piece of rock off the ledge nearby and started hitting the bottom edge of the box, harder and harder.

"No, Stop! don't capitalize the S" Alison shouted, tears coming to her eyes, but it was too late. The sharp edge of the stone caved in the side near the handle, and must have broken something inside. As the handle fell off onto the dune grass, the tune died out, its last few notes whipping away in the wind.

"Uh, sorry, Alison. I didn't mean to." Tim looked apologetic, but just for a moment, then peered in the hole he had made in the box. consider ending the sentence with 'made'. That way you won't have to repeat 'box'. "Hey, there's nothing in there. Hello, hello, hello!" he called into the box, but nothing happened. Losing interest, he raced back to the beach.

Alison couldn't even find the words to yell after him. She just looked at the music box, still wedged in place, but now crumpled and silent. Her tears fell freely onto the sand. Brothers ruin everything! she thought, and ran back toward the beach and her parents.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Bad news, captain. The signal stopped before we could determine where it was located. We tried..." replace the ellipse with a dash. His speech was interrupted. The private wasn't able to finish, as start the sentence with 'his', as the dash already signifies his speech being interrupted. his head went spinning across the floor and rolled under a blinking console. His wide eyes hadn't even had time to register surprise, and now stared blankly at the wall.

The Captain retracted his sharp tail, and glared at the decapitated private. Incompetent subordinates ruin everything! he thought, and trudged back to his cabin to go through travel brochures, suddenly looking forward to his retirement.

I like the use of irony with Alison's and the captain's parallel thoughts. She couldn't even yell at him. The captain beheaded his subordinate. Brilliant.

As I said, you've gained much with plot. I think Laura led you to this Eureka moment, yes? It's just that the second half of the story feels different.

I hope the line editing helped. I'm positive this piece will find a home real soon. Not the typical space opera, and atypical is good :).

All the best!
18
18
Review of Alison's Find  Open in new Window.
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: ASR | (4.5)
Hello Ben,

I read this story when you put it up, and now it has marinated enough for me to give a feedback :).

The narrative voice is beautiful, elegant. I can clearly imagine a little girl having her own adventures at/near a secluded beach.

So here are my observations:

1. She swooped and soared up to the top of the dunes...

- Swooping is diving down, yes? Consider using 'swooped' before back down in a rush.... Just a thought, though.


2. the dragon flies to see. Consider 'dragonflies'.


3. the odd box stuck precariously between the rocks like a small boat doomed to wait for the fickle tide to rise again and set it free.

- Beautiful simile, and suits well with the whole imagery.


4. intrepid treasure hunter, searching the jungles of Guyana for ancient artifacts.

- This one made me stop though. Has Alison been to Guyana? Or heard about it? The reference, though excellent, doesn't seem to fit with a little girl, unless it's clear she's from South America or loves to watch travel documentaries, or her parents travel to such places.

5. ...for she was aware that ancient artifacts require careful study.

- I may be wrong here, but you're using two tenses in a sentence. I'm not sure about this, so it's your call.


6. ...mostly they reminded her of shapes on the architectural drawings her dad would sometimes bring home...

- This reference, on the other hand, is clear. She doesn't directly know the architectural designs, but learns of them from observing her father's work.


7. and play "Pachelbel's Canon"

- Consider using italics instead of inverted commas.


8. ...Tim would help her search for driftwood...

- What's the significance of this? Unless she wants to use it to wedge the box out of the rocks (which was not referred), it's a distraction.


9. ...the shapes seemed to grow in a pattern...

- I get the image of the shapes getting physically larger in real-time, in front of her eyes.


10. The ending is a funny twist. I don't know if you intended it to be ironic or ominous, but it reminds me of an old cartoon show. Loony Toons, or something. I can't remember exactly. But I know it's a cartoon. Come to think of it, the story's almost exactly alike. As I said. Funny. I grinned thinking the girl unknowingly and innocently doomed the whole planet. It's just like a random diver finding a plug at the ocean floor and pulled it out, causing all the oceans of Earth to drain and dry. You intended the aliens to be generic, right?


11. You use amongst (usually British English) and American English with the rest. No right or wrong, just glad to know others interchange the two usages as well. I was raised to use UK English, but I told myself to use US English once I finished school (sort of a silent rebellion against my education system). But doing it leaves me confused most of the time!

Overall, a highly entertaining story. If only Alison finds out what she did!
19
19
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
(continued from Part 2)

This is much better, as his actions are more focused.

The edges of the artificial flesh, or what was left of it, was ragged as if torn from their bodies...

- Replace 'was' with 'were'.

He approached it slowly, the overhead light flickering on the zipper, inviting him to grasp and pull, to open up the bag like a gift.

- The usage of simile 'gift' is not quite suitable with the situation. He's hesitant, he's unsure of its content, but he's happy to open the bodybag?

...what looked like a man in his late thirties, athletic build, blond hair.

- OK, he's cataloging, but you don't have to make it literal.

When you describe the android, you use both 'thing' and 'him' for it. What does Joshua think of androids? Mere machine or humanoid? Stick with Joshua's set perception.

A voice in his head told him to hold off, but the voice didn’t know what it was talking about. The voice never had to go through what he was going through. The voice didn’t know what it was like to be imprisoned, entombed. The voice was just a self-righteous little prick that wasn’t going to tell him what to do.

- This one sounds artificial too. You can use more finesse with this. I know you can.

Overall, Part 3 is tighter, and much better. Don't lose focus, and don't just amble about. Joshua's in a grave condition (no pun intended), so be Joshua. Close your eyes and imagine how you would react in his situation.

I want to read what happens next. You have something good going on here. Just need to tighten and have focus.

Hope to read more.
20
20
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: 13+ | (3.5)
Hello Charles,

I've read through all three parts of this story, and I'm going to touch on the story in general before going in-depth with each part.

You may not like what I'm going to say from this point on. Take whatever you find useful, ignore whatever you deem as crap. Like usual, my friend.

First off, so far this story is about Man against World. There's only one character going about. That is, until the android in blue boxers come alive. I suggest considering telling this story in first-person PoV. The reasons being:
- You can make the story more engaging, involving.
- The fact that Joshua is stranded alone and doesn't really know what's going on makes first-person perfect. You can play with his emotions, interior monologues, and reveal his surroundings as the story progresses (with first-person, readers only find out what the narrator sense and feel).
- There's not much dialogue, so with third person, the story will start feeling distanced, like a summary of events.

Consider the following:

Your opening paragraph:
Joshua Kellum awoke in his sleep pod to a volcanic tremor of Baby Vesuvius on Jupiter’s moon, Io. It startled him because the tremors were usually ones and twos, barely enough for someone to feel them. This tremor was more like a six. It rattled the digital flatscreen mounted to his right and knocked over the little, framed picture of his wife and two children on the shelf to his left. The deep rumble made his teeth rattle until he clenched his jaw. About the time he thought he would be shaken out of his pod, the fierce vibrating stopped.

Possible first-person opening:
At first I thought it was my alarm clock vibrating on my bunker. But the sudden shattering of glass told me otherwise.

Moonquake.

Having spent almost a year in this mining outpost, I was already oblivious to the frequent volcanic tremors of Baby Vesuvius. But those were usually of Scales one and two. From the chattering of my teeth, and the headache it was causing me, this one felt more like a six. I did what I was trained to do in situations such as this. I rolled off my bunker, landed with a thud and an "Oof!", and elbowed my way underneath it. The mounted digital flatscreen began to rattle on its hinge, and I braced myself for possible impact. When I thought the whole pod would cave in, the quake stopped.


Yes, it becomes longer, but the story now gets personal. Just a thought, though.

So far, with over 4000 words, not much is happening. A recap:
1. Joshua is rudely woken by the quake.
2. He checks out the picture of his family, and calmly goes to the toilet (checking out the deco on the way there). He's not fazed when another tremor comes, gets hungry, and decides to eat.
3. Only then does he start to check what's wrong, and then he starts panicking.
4. When the sulfuric ash comes, he runs back to his pod, put on some music, and falls asleep. He even dreams.
5. He's hungry again.
6. He checks the base for damage, then makes himself a full-course meal. Medium rare.
7. He tries to communicate with the outside world and fails.
8. He finds a room of androids in various stages of nakedness, and decides to activate one.
9. Half-naked android wakes up.

You have to have a clear length cap for your story if you aim for publication. Some accept up to 20000 words, some much less than that. You have a highly interesting premise here. And from the way things are going, there's still a lot more to come. Tighten your prose. Make every word count, every event significant. You can spend the word count on describing how Joshua feels, how he's reacting, his surroundings, the damage on the base.

Joshua's reaction is odd, somehow. He oscillates between calm and panicky. Hey, no one's here! Panic! Wait. He's hungry. Calm. Make a meal. But no one's here. Panic! How would you feel if you experience a big quake for the first time, and then find out you're all alone with no hope of escaping? Would you amble to the toilet? Would you make yourself a full-course meal?


-------------------------------------------------------------------
Part 1:
Big quake, and Joshua seeks comfort in something familiar: his family photo. Good. Use this, expand it. How is he reacting to the quake? How does he seek calm? What does he feel looking at the picture? How does he feel remembering his family, knowing they're safe at home?

He goes to the toilet and makes a passing comment on the deco. Wouldn't he logically be checking on what's happening first? Would he brace himself for an aftershock? Not that a fictional character can't pee. You're making him human. Excellent. Unless you state that big tremors are a usual occurrence, a normal person would want to find out what's happening.

He checks out the window and sees the active volcano. Good. This is where you can talk a bit about where he is, describe what he sees. Not just as a passing comment, but in-depth. You can reveal he's on the surface of Io, and that Jupiter, with its colorful bands of gas, dominates the sky. You don't have to reveal all that in the opening paragraph. Dedicate that to the quake that wakes Joshua up.

He's hungry. Good. But make him ignore it first. Have him check the commlink, the mail from his family. By the way, the italicized monologue about Clara, make it present-tense.

I don't know how to talk writing-technical, but two or more actions separated by commas must be related, and of the same subject. You wrote these:

1. Standing in front of the urinal, the digital information screen at eye level displayed the words ‘no signal.’

What is standing in front of the urinal? From this sentence, The digital screen is doing the standing.

consider: Joshua stood in front of the urinal and read the words 'NO SIGNAL' on the wall-mounted information screen. or Standing in front of the urinal, Joshua saw the words 'NO SIGNAL' displayed on the information screen mounted at eye-level.

2. Turning towards the dining hall, the tile floor became dark green carpet.

The tile floor is turning toward the hall.

consider: He turned toward the dining hall, where a green carpet covered the tiled floor.

Is there a need for a capital C in chandeliers?

He planned to grab one of his fellow miners by the shirt and say, “Why the hell didn’t you bastards wake me up?”

Doesn't feel natural. Consider replacing 'planned to grab' with 'wanted to grab' or 'felt like grabbing', or lose the sentence altogether.

He's starting to panic. Good. You've conveyed it well.

The revelation about the meteor is only mentioned in passing. You should dedicate more words, a paragraph even, on this, as it is significant, and readers will expect impending danger from the possible collision.

Make the readers panic when Joshua looks out the window to see the incoming sulfuric ash. Describe it. Make it sound ominous. Prolong the moment, and show us how Joshua feels and reacts when he sees it. End this part with a cliffhanger. As it is, he manages to get to his pod with ease. Give him a large obstacle. Maybe his pod is too far, and he won't make it in time. There are plenty of empty pods, right? This is the moment where you should focus on. The big danger. It deserves more than just two lines.

(more to follow with Part II)
21
21
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
In affiliation with Let's Publish!  Open in new Window.
Rated: 18+ | (3.5)
Hello Raven,

You're not kidding when you say it's raw, huh? I've read other 'raw' works from you, and I know you can turn this into magic.

I like how you like turning lore into your own version. Thanks for the Wikipedia link. Also, thanks to YouTube, I get to listen to the song!

So here's your setting: a Harper/bard tells the recurring stories of the Twa Sisters to a family, by the fireplace/hearth. With just this, I can close my eyes and see three generations of a family sitting in the living room, made cozy with layers of fur blanket. The light from the crackling fireplace dance on the irregular stones of the wall, and shadow dominates the far reaches. Light and shadow dance, and the scent of burning wood fills the room. The bard tunes his harp, the sounds occasionally discordant. Once tuned, he plays a song, barely above a whisper, haunting, mesmerizing. Still playing, he looks at the boy and asks him which story he wishes to listen to that night.

Work your magic, Raven. This is a slow, haunting story. Hmm...I don't understand the Celtic words, but the song feels like a jingle! Not like Enya's songs. Anyway, the story. It doesn't have to be action-packed. The opening line doesn't have to have action. But draw readers in with beautiful imagery.

I like the images in the fire. You've watched The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe, right? The part where Mr Tumnus plays his flute, and the magic slowly builds up and takes over the senses, and then the fire in the hearth starts to take shape and dance? It's a magical moment. Play with it. Expand it.

The Harper is also a musician. Describe the cadence of his voice, his intonations. Don't make his dialogue conversational. How would a storyteller weave his story to enrapture the audience? Does he talk in stanzas? Do his words have internal rhymes?

For example:
"The first woman," the Harper began, his voice soft as the rustle of autumn leaves. "A mother of all men she was, as sunlight, golden, nurturing. She had a sister, and different day is to night, so were they." The Harper kept his eyes on the boy as he flicked long fingers on the hairlike strings on the harp. His gentle music filled the room, and in that moment, nothing else existed. Just his voice, and the music of the harp.

Hmm...don't know if that sounds OK, but you get what I mean, right?

You can definitely come up with a revision that will wow me. Looking forward to reading that version.
22
22
Review of My Trusty iPod  Open in new Window.
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
{f:verdana}Hello Laura,

I have to say, I was intrigued when I read the title. I'm addicted to my iPhone, so I wanted to see what you cooked up for its sister. Can I be honest and blunt? The iPod did not live up to the title you've given. Reading your story reminded me of Perseus and Medusa. Your iPod is as Perseus's bronze shield. A minor, if vital, object that helped Perseus severe Medusa's head. If the legend had been titled The Bronze Shield, people would have expected the shield to be a major part of the legend (like the Golden Fleece and the Trojan Horse to their respective legends). If you want to showcase the iPod, give it a stronger role.

1. Not everyone can pull off the beginning of a story with dialogue. Even though the first line didn't leave me wondering what's going on, it has a hook of its own. Hailey's voice is heard; she knows what she wants and she's not intimidated (especially with the following paragraph, where she's overwhelmed by her rise). You've done well with the opening line.


2. Three consecutive paragraphs begin with Hailey. Nothing wrong, but they distract the eye. If I were distracted, I could re-read the same paragraph and that'd be annoying.


3. I'm sure others will have the correct technical usage for this, but this sentence sounds off: On her way to her dressing room, she noticed The Sirens' dressing room door stood open.

Makes sense if 'that' is added: ...she noticed that The Siren's dressing room door stood open.
- However, especially in informal sentences and/or in fiction, 'that' can be dropped. So your sentence should be correct as it is.

Or, use present participle: ...she noticed The Siren's dressing room door standing open. (I prefer this one, but I know you don't)


4. They jumped up.
When someone's on the ground, it's a given when jumping, he goes up. Redundant.


5. They all turned to the door. Sure enough, there was a big gold star on the door. Hailey's door didn't even have a nail on it.

Repetition, too close together. What about this: They all turned to the door. Sure enough, there was a big gold star on its beveled surface. Hailey's didn't even have a nail on it.


7. Stay here? Alone? No, Hailey thought as she scurried after them. That wasn't going to happen.

Thoughts are usually written in present tense. Not gonna happen.


8. ...door they'd just come in. Denny had sense enough to block the door with his body. He yelled to Bobby, "Get that cart!"

Previous dialogue and actions belong to the manager. Give Denny a new paragraph.


9. "Oh, dear lord....
- Lord (capitalized)


10. Bobby looked at her and said sarcastically, "Well I don't see no cape on ya. Are ya some kind of Superhero?"

Unnecessary adverb, as the dialogue itself has conveyed his sarcasm. Have faith in your dialogues. You're good at it. You don't need dialogue-related adverbs.


11. ...thing's teeth as it prepared to bite her head off.

I may be wrong, but you jumped into its head in the same paragraph you're in Hailey's perspective. Big no-no.


12. As it is, the baseball bat got more action and more airtime than Hailey's iPod.


13. Her most fervent thought, as they roared out of the fairgrounds, was: I am soooo glad my mom bought me an iPod for Christmas!

Maybe it's just me, but the ending line sounds corny.

- - * - -


Here's my suggestion. There's nothing wrong with keeping your title, but you have to showcase Hailey's iPod, and not just use it at the end. You've done well in introducing it early on (3rd paragraph). Readers will suspect the significance of it, but the title has already given it off. That's why it's frustrating when the iPod wasn't used much.

What you can do is foreshadowing. Instead of just toward the end, when Hailey hears the off-key singing, why not drop hints from the middle of the story itself? For example, the Sirens are rock stars, and Hailey is a singer, right? Why not have her hear faint singing when she stumbles across Harry the first time, and that song starts to turn dissonant. Harry looks at the direction of the ceiling and comments about being sick of their annual rite. Since the story is about musicians, use musical terms (for authenticity). Don't just have Hailey thinking that it's off-key. How is it off-key? Think Simon Cowell. And since Hailey is a singer, she has sensitive ears. She puts on her iPod and plays soothing music. She can think clearer, and when the music gets even weirder and louder, and the boys start going toward the music, readers will start thinking that maybe Hailey's not affected because of the iPod. When she fights them, she gets knocked down and the earphones get pulled out. She starts getting dazed, but quickly regains her senses and jam the buds into her ears and plays the music full blast. Play a specific song, a famous one maybe. That will put a time stamp on your story, and some say it's not a good idea, but readers can imagine the song as background music accompanying the fight.

I know Sirens are supposed to entice men only, but sailors of old were men, so it's not tested on women. But now your iPod plays a major role, and readers can appreciate why Hailey calls it her trusty iPod.

I like how your characters have their own voices. That's very good. Keep it up.

The story has that Perseus vs Medusa feel. I don't know if it was intended or not. Nothing wrong with it, just my observation. It also has a House of Horror feel, with all the monsters. Like edgework commented, they'd be scarier in human form. Let's face it, humans are the scariest creatures out there. You're the author though, so it's totally up to you how you paint it. But do give Hailey respite, a breather between the monster attacks. Readers will thank you for a bit of rest.

Hope this helps!
23
23
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 13+ | (4.5)
Dear winnie,

This revision deserved the upgrade in rating. The flow is much smoother, and the story as a whole feels more natural. Beautiful. I especially like the ending now, and your not directly revealing Rebecca's death is a technical feat. Congratulations on that subtle yet poignant touch.

OK. Here are some issues:

1. The dirty dishes on the counter displayed a prismatic glow of orange and yellow hues refracted through the east window. Dawn was her favorite time of the day. Her gaze was drawn to the distant, ice-capped mountains shrouding the deep ravine below. She thought back to that particular sunrise two months ago and shuddered.

Using dirty dishes is a clever touch, well-suited with Ted's catatonic condition. However, normal dishes, either bone or ceramic (or even plastic), dirty ones at that, don't usually glow in sunlight. When they're clean, maybe. Dirty, definitely not. Close your eyes. Imagine what would glow. Metallic objects? Forks, spoons or knives? Clear glass, as in wine glasses (regular glasses even)? They can still be dirty, the glasses can still be half-filled, but they would certainly catch the sunlight.

Second issue: in the second sentence, you've written dawn is Rebecca's favorite time of the day. Then the final sentence ended with her shuddering. Direct opposites. What makes the mountains remind her of two months ago?

I think the opening paragraph can be rethought and rewritten into something stronger.


2. ...his salt and pepper hair...

salt-and-pepper hair


3. Ted stumbled to the master bathroom, snapped on the cold water faucet and splashed his stubbled face. He raised his head and starred into the image that was looking back at him. When did I get so gray?

Rebecca sat on the bed and watched him through the open door. She wondered if he was going to shave today. “Are you going in to work, Ted? You’ve always told me how much you love your job. I’d hate to see them replace you.”

He brushed passed her and headed to the night stand, grabbed a Marlboro from the half empty pack, stuck it between his lips, and thumbed the lighter as he inhaled.


OK. Two paragraphs before the copied passage, you've already entered Ted's head (Ted wondered if he could stand to face another day.). So, when he's wondering how come his head is gray, it's OK 'coz we've already established the perspective. But the next paragraph you jumped into Rebecca's head by making her wonder if he's going to shave, and then back into Ted's head thereafter.

While grammatically correct, technically and stylistically this is not encouraged. Some authors of books on writing advice other writers to reserve one chapter or part (or breaks) for a single perspective, so that readers can settle comfortably in one head and not get confused. We call this close or subjective Third Person PoV. When you don't want to highlight emotional impacts on any particular characters, you can go ahead and jump heads. That's Omniscient Third Person PoV. Winnie-the-Pooh but A.A. Milne is a good example. Bit it was written in 1926. Current favored Third Person PoV is staying put in one head, two or three at most, with different parts/chapters for each character.


3. Rebecca calls Ted 'Honey', 'Baby', 'Teddy', and 'Ted'. No problems here, but if you think back, do you call your closest loved ones by different call names? I know my parents call me Fadz, unless when they're especially miffed, they'll call me by my full name. Some of my friends call me differently, but they maintain the same call name. Just something to think about.


4. In real-life conversations, we hear things like this:

"So, okay. Have you hear this ah juicy bit?"

"What juicy bit?"

"Sandy, like, you know, from uh accounts, she totally made out with ah Jeff from, what's that again? Ah...um...right, management."

"No, seriously? Sandy and uh, what's his name again? Jeff? Really?"


Although it may be natural to hear people saying things like this, reading it exactly as it is can be annoying.

Consider the following:

"Wanna hear something juicy? Sandy from accounts made out with Jeff from management."

"Sandy? With Jeff? Seriously?"


The sentences used are still fragmented, like real dialogue. But there are no real-life ah, um, oh interruptions.

Now consider this:



"Here now, do you want to hear a juicy news? Sandy -- you remember her, the tall blond girl you say hi to every morning? She had intercourse with Jeff, the man from management, who sits opposite you."

"Sandy had intercourse with Jeff? Are you certain?"


This third one used to be favored by authors in the early 20th century. This is what we now call a stilted dialogue. Even though it is grammatically correct, the sentences complete, the dialogue is totally unnatural. And littered with information dump too. Of course the other lady would know both Sandy and Jeff, seeing how they bump into each other daily. If you think about it, maybe readers need to know, but the lady certainly doesn't need reminding. Those additional info can be saved to be told elsewhere.

Again, something to think about. Your dialogues are so much better now. Rebecca is no longer nagging, but she does seem more and more frustrated that Ted isn't listening. Isn't that how sometimes arguments go? You can brush things up a bit more to make things sound natural. Think screenplay, or think about your favorite actors saying out those dialogue lines. Sometimes it helps.


5. Just like point number 3, you jumped into Jim's head for a paragraph. Jim didn’t know what to say. You can either say 'Jim looked as if he didn't know what to say' (by doing this, the reader is still in Ted's head, interpreting Jim's body language) or lose it together and express it in the dialogue itself, trusting the readers to understand and interpret what you want to convey.


All in all, this is much improved. Why not try out for this competition: "Invalid ItemOpen in new Window.? It qualifies as a ghost story, and it is good.

All the best, winnie!
24
24
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
Rated: 13+ | (4.0)
Hello, winnie!

Thought I'd check today's Cramp. Nice to see your piece there!

Boy oh boy, I didn't see this one coming. Very nice twist at the end! I was wondering how can this woman nag nag nag non-stop, without the husband butting in or shout back at her. I thought I was surprised to find out his daughter died (kinda guessed it when he was reminiscing on the picture she drew). But I didn't expect Rebecca to be a ghost!

Much, much better than previous pieces.

Now, on to business.

1. The opening paragraph is fine. Personally I sometimes like to start with 'the weather report'. Some people don't like starting with this, though. They much prefer in media res, starting in the middle of a fast-pacing scene, or a conversation. But with your opening, it'd be good if you make the visual input stronger. You can talk about the light, or the light's effect on the kitchen counter, sink, utensils, and all that. How are the Utah mountains beautiful? Do they look like sleeping dragons, or a painting?

- with limited wordcount, don't crack your brain so much on this, as it doesn't serve to move the story. Every word counts.


2. 'Rebecca went down the hall to check on Ted. They had been married ten years and their love seemed to grow with every passing year.'

This seems artificial. I'm not sure how to remedy this. Maybe something like this: On her way to check on Ted, Rebecca passed their wedding photo mounted on the peach wall. It was ten years since she said "I do," but the years flew by unnoticed.'


3. She entered the master bedroom and lovingly gazed at her lover and best friend.

Repetitive usage that means the same thing. I suggest losing the adverb.


4. “Good morning, honey. It’s a beautiful day. Are you gonna get up or just lie around all day? You haven‘t done a thing in weeks and this has got to stop.”

I know there isn't supposed to be any interaction between them, but having her talking non-stop makes her look like a nag, contradicting your statement on how they love each other more and more each year. You can break your dialogue with action. He can't interact with her, but she can with him. Use that.

"Good morning, honey," she said, squatting on the carpeted floor so that her face met his. "The day is beautiful, it's a shame to waste it lying in bed." Rebecca leaned closer and ran a finger on his unshaven jaw. "You haven't done a thing in weeks," she added, her voice softer. "This has to stop."

But it means more wordcount. Hmm...maybe a short break for action to make the dialogue more believable.


5. 'Ted stumbled to the master bath...'

bathroom?


6. Hmm...Rebecca does nag a lot, doesn't she? I think you can have her 'arguing' with him without having it sound like nagging. E.g.

“I thought you quit that nasty habit. Those things are going to kill you. Are you listening to me?”

- this sounds condescending and overbearing, judgmental. I.e. nagging. You can change it subtly into something like this:

"Baby, you promised you quit. Think about Amanda's asthma attacks. Or your co-worker who died from lung cancer. I can't lose you." Rebecca frowned when he took another drag. "Why won't you listen?"


7. 'Rebecca followed talking to his back as she continued her solicitation.'

You can lose this sentence altogether. Makes her sound even more of a nag.


8. '“Honey, why don’t you try and pull yourself together. Look at the beautiful day rising before you. It’s been two months and you’ve barely gotten out of bed most days.”'

Again, this seems artificial. Can be incorporated in the dialogue when they're in the bedroom, but gentler. That way you won't waste word count.


9. '...joined in the surveillance.'

This sounds out of place, unless Rebecca is also a police officer. You can replace the sentence with 'Rebecca leaned over his shoulder and looked out.' Break the sentence into a new paragraph, and attach it with her dialogue "Teddy, it's Jim. Why aren't you inviting him in for coffee?"


10. '“I mean … she lets me sleep in, and rushes off with Amanda because we’re out of cream.'

This makes it sound like he's blaming her for it. Is he?


11. “The phone wakes me up and I’m wondering why Rebecca hasn’t answered it. It was St. Joseph’s Hospital. There’d been an accident, they said. The car went down a ravine and flipped several times. They wanted me to get to the hospital right away. I rushed through the emergency entrance and was met by the pastor from our church. I thought, this can’t be good, and began to shake. He said he was sorry, but Rebecca and Amanda were gone.” Ted collapsed in the kitchen chair and sobbed.

Information dump. You can make this revelation more elegant. As it is, it sounds like a rushed summary.


12. 'He touched the tingling spot on his face and smiled.'

He's sobbing, and then suddenly he's smiling? You can end with something like this:

'He touched the tingling spot on his face and looked up on reflex. But there was no one. Rebecca was no longer there.'


13. OK. This is a bit trickier. You're in Rebecca's head in the beginning. Then both Rebecca's and Teddy's. Toward the end there's a line where you're in Jim's head.

' Jim was glad to hear Ted talk about it. Maybe this was a sign of healing.'

This is what I mean by being in Jim's head.

It is not advisable to jump perspectives. Maybe it's difficult to keep things in one character's head for this story, but you can pull it off by staying in Rebecca's head, describing Teddy's actions and reactions from her vantage point, until the last line, when Teddy feels the tingling sensation.

How I've not been overbearing, and hope this helps.

Looking forward to reading more from you.
25
25
Review by Fadz Author IconMail Icon
Rated: E | (4.5)
Winnie, this is a great piece!

I enjoyed reading it, and wished it was longer, so I could be in Buster's head more.

Now, if you don't mind, some things. I think you can get away without the first paragraph, or, tone it down to a dog's perspective. Seems to be from an academician's view.
More drama could be added to the last bit, to show the danger of Buster losing his ninth life. Didn't feel for Buster as much as I did when he saved Becky's life before this.

All in all, it's a good read. Thanks for writing this!
26 Reviews · *Magnify*
Page of 2 · 25 per page   < >
Printed from https://writing.com/main/profile/reviews/fadz