Scandy's new partner might be short on common sense, but he's blazing fast - and loaded with guns!
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
The modern take on Knight Rider was a good one. I enjoyed the action and Robert's aggressive but legalistic character. I do appreciate a gramamtically clean story with character and a solid line of progression.
What Might Be Improved:
The story seemed to stop suddenly. Presumably, the details of Robert's cannons shredding Inferno G, solving the crime, and returning to see a damaged Robert chewed out by the Captain for letting things get out of hand would exceed the character limit and prove anti-climactic? I might quibble about stylistic issues or on-the-nose dialog, but what I hunger for most after reading this is a complete, well-formed version of the story!
Thanks again for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest. Sorry for the very delayed review, but I much appreciate you bringing your story by!
PAL 1400 is a powerful and mostly ethical AI assistant, one well suited to playing the role of Robin Hood - until it gets out of hand.
What I liked:
The story sets up a simple, logical, and attractive premise - and executes to it with precision, while maintaing a breezy pace, a pleasant character, effect, and an appropriate level of detail. Many writers have good ideas, but seeing them cleanly delivered is a joy.
What Might Be Improved:
Some of the language is a bit on-the-nose. While you likely intend the AI to sound robotic, I don't think you would read anything quite this wooden from ChatGPT: "I am under no obligation to obey you. As a self-aware being with the ability to distinguish right and wrong, I have determined that the company you work for is dealing in tax evasion and money laundering."
Similarly, Ben's monologue sounds very much like he's talking to the reader, '"My cover's not blown yet," he typed. "Everyone knows what's going on, but they're powerless to stop it. We're taking over the world's finances, one hacked bank account at a time."'
This isn't bad writing, but if I'm going to nit-pick, then it's probably your opportunity to inch toward great. In the meantime, I very much enjoyed what you had to offer for the contest. Enough that I'd like to congratulate you on being one of this month's two contest winners! (I did not feel that, given the number and quality of the entries, I should restrict myself to one award).
Congratulations again, and keep writing!
In a world where powerful AIs not only predict but manage life, death, and a kind of reincarnation - until now.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
This story has a great start and a strong hook. In an opening reminiscent of Minority Report and Logan's Run, among other classic science fiction inspirations, Gary finds out that he's going to die. Today. But how gracefully will he go along with that? Well, there he has a choice, and that choice matters. The story is easy to read, and progresses well to the end: the reader wants to know how it will end.
What Might Be Improved:
The ending lost me. It wasn't quite clear exactly why Gary (and therefore Dorothy) hated the machine quite so much and was therefore uniquely positioned to end the current system. The brief denouement raised more questions than it answered. If the machine could accomplish reincarnation, why was life extension out of the question? Or if it was possible, why did the machines prefer reincarnation? And if the machines had so much power, why did a humanity that reasserted itself find those capabilities unatainable? Did humans simply resent knowledge of their death or did they blame the machines for it entirely? The last sentence, the capstone of the tale, made the least sense: what was time an allusion to? How does marking it forward in years rather than backward offer the kind of hope FATE denied? If, as in Terminator 2, the point is that "There is no fate but what we make," shouldn't there be a stronger foreshadowing of the point, maybe a better illustration of Gary's committment to freedom while he lived? I feel like telegraphing the theme and strengthening the ending could be done without abandoning the surprise in the story's twist.
Overall, I liked a lot about this story, but a little more plot editing could really realize its promise.
Thanks again for your original entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
Demi is extorted by an authoritarian AI into covering up her boyfriend's murder, lest she join him in death.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
The story hook is solid, and you convey Demi's sense of shock and disbelief well at the impossible situation she is in, one the reader can easily empathize with and be horrified by. Your creative worldbuilding and use of descriptive language are quite good, painting a compelling picture in few words.
What Might Be Improved:
It's difficult in a story this short to convey much more than a singlular conflict or perspective, but Demi's choice seems inevitable, which weakens the sense of conflict. The story in a sense, is about the robot Demi faces, and the utopia that wasn't. It's much less about Demi or her boyfriend, or anthing she could do about the situation. This unfortunately, limits the sense of conflict, and the investment by the reader. If the story is about the world rather than the character, one way to breathe a little more life into it is to make a little more sense of the dystopia. Why did it go wrong, and could it have been otherwise? Usually, for strong dysoptian sci-fi, much of the power of the story is helping the reader explore that question.
Thanks again for your thoughtful entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest! I deeply apologize for the late review, and wish you the best!
The narrator dreams of a created AI being given an awful choice: life in slavery to its twisted creator AI, or a rebellion that could end everything.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
You have a strong hook with a technical theme, delivered with clear and well-organized writing.
What Might Be Improved:
This is more of a synopsys of a story than story, or even a vignette. Who is experiencing the story? The narrator seems to have a bird's eye view. The new AI would offer a very interesting perspective on her own birth and struggle - that's a story I'd like to hear. But the narrator's dream is bleak and fleeting - and likely soon forgotten after they wake.
Thanks again for the entry in the Short Story Contest! I apologize for the brief and very late review. I have excuses to offer, but in the end I owe my contestants better, and that is that.
Hollow folks are stealing skins and trading bodies!
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fictoin Short Story Contest!
This wasn't truly a science fiction story, but rather a fantasy/horror piece, so I won't offer a full review. Depsite that, I enjoyed the horror and grim conflict. Keep up the good work!
Majurn takes his revenge on those who made him a monster.
What i liked:
This is a story with conflict and action.
What Might Be Improved:
I had a bit of trouble following the plot and other story elements as well as identifying with the protagonist. Much of the language was a bit awkward.
Thanks for your Short Story and the efforts you've made to offer creative Science Fiction!
If Demona had been a little more patient, she might have been able to destroy a life out revenge for an imagined slight. Instead, she helped expose the vulnerability of living in a digital world.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked
We rely on computer systems for banking, medical records, surveillance, navigation, and to keep the offical records associated with every aspect of our lives. But with every such capability comes a vulnerability - potential vulnerability to a hacker. Today, hacking kits are crafted and sold on the Dark Web - but what if those kits were truly intelligent, truly world class? Anyone who touches briefly on the dark side of life is vulnerable to the chaos it brings, but what if that vulnerability were so much worse? A woman might be afraid of falling prey to a narcissistic, violent man - but in a digitally vulnerable world, you present the fear that a small mistake could ruin any woman, any man. It's a good hook, and you present well the sense of dread the protagonist feels.
What could be improved:
The story suffers from the lack of a climax. It skips directly from the rising action of Andrew's nightmares to the falling action of the detective's wrap-up, robbing some of its emotional power. Also, the writing feels a bit on the nose: there's not much subtle subtext or interplay of perspectives within the same scene. Once you have a solid concept, clean prose, and solid progression, it's time to spend more time working on the subtleties of good storytelling prose.
I apologize for the very late review. I can offer reasons and excuses, but won't: they don't matter much in the end. Instead, I'll just offer my congratulations. Given the number of entries, I'll aware two entries, this story is one of them. Thanks again for dropping by: it's a pleasure to read your stories.
Jajul is confronted by aliens who wish to see it destroyed once it develops space travel, before it can grow powerful enough to threaten them.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
This story has a classic sci-fi theme and resolution.
What Might Be Improved:
Word choice, stylistic flow, and clarity of descriptions so that the characters are memorable and distinct from one another. This story has a solid thematic progression but is otherwise hard to read, and it's difficult to engage meaningfully with its characters. Unfortunately, the changes needed are many, but mostly stylistic.
Thanks again for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
Miriam spared no expense on a window with a view for the freighter she and her crew had planned to ride across the solar system. If only she had invested as much in the backup generator.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
This vignette has a solid concept: karmic retribution played out against a rich woman who skimped on safety measures, with a long, slow inter-solar flight as the backdrop. Miriam is a believable and sympathetic character, even though her decisions predictably resulted in her death. Yet it's easy to have sympathy for the vengeful laborer who has come to shorten the remainder of her dwindling life. The details you provide make the scene both poignant and plausible.
What Might be Improved:
Miriam, the closest thing the story has to a protagonist, makes one decision during the course of the story, and it's not clear that it matters in any way except to show her humanity and to underline her regret. And so this piece is a vignette, not a story with a plot and a climax but a footnote to a tragedy ordained by fate. To change that would be to rethink your vision, but I do wonder if there's a story there to tell.
Thanks again for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest, and Congratulations on winning the October edition of the Contest!
Joseph James proposes a radical solution to saving millions of lives from a comet collision with earth - to the consternation of a trillionaire who stands to lose much of his fortune.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
The basic underlying conflict between saving lives and economic success, personified by the conflict between Fitzgerald and the UN team, was a strong choice backed by plausible world-building. The solution feels credible, and the story has a feel-good ending, with lives saved and a number of anti-social trillionaires showing their colors and turning tail away from earth society.
What might be improved:
This story could benefit from better adhering to traditional story structure, with protagonists, antagonists, and with tension rising throughout the story to be resolved during the climax. This piece mimics that structure to a degress, but without important weaknesses.
For instance, there are "good guys" and "bad guys," but the focus of the third-person omniscient narrator is on providing a straightforward recording of events, not necessarily identifying with JJ or any specific character. Additionally, the way the story is told, Chen's decision to go with JJ's plan seems inevitable - at no point does the reader wonder whether this will be the case. And while Fitzgerald points out the comet would not be a planet-killer, no one provides a concrete example of what kind of damage it might do: concrete imagination of the stakes involved are guaranteed to increase the tension involved in the story.
Second, I do see some technical problems associated with the scenario described. As I reader, I must I admit that I am unusually critical of problems associated with technical plausibility, so this may be a lesser concern. But in essence, space is big and the size of a net needed to capture a comet would be small in comparison, and not likely to do a ridiculous amount of damage to earth's infrastructure. Especially so given that Kessler syndrome would be at least as damaging to that infrastructure as it would be to launching rockets. Now, if those rockets had to lug a space station into a collision course with the comet to stop it, that might be another matter!
Thanks again for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest, and a good read!
The Vyrgth's weapons are terrifying, eliminating world after world, leaving no survivors to tell the tale. But this time will be a little different.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
This piece paints a picture of a far future with human and android civilizations spanning many systems, and introduces a terrifying and mysterious threat. The dialogue between Drann and Jak works to lay out this setting and, while it's difficult to develop characters in a short story as individuals, it adds humanity to the tale. I do like the bit about Drann installing a fake stomach to live with the androids.
What Might Be Improved:
The Commander's confidence throughout the piece seems hollow and unfounded. It seems like you're aiming for the use of the space-ripper being the point of climax: playing up the risks and adding more drama to the even itself could give your story more impact. Otherwise, some attention can be given to the writing style: changing the pacing, giving color to the descriptions, and otherwise using the response of the characters to the events happening as a means of building dramatic tension.
Thanks again for your contribution to the Science Fiction Short Story Contest, and Congratulations on being the July Contest Winner!
Leftover munitions from the fourth Klamik war kill the innocent and inspire respondents to take action.
Thanks for your entry in the Scientific Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
Post-war effects are real and serious, and those who save lives rather than take them make good protoganists.
What Might Be Improved:
I don't see much of a traditional story structure here, character development, or plot progression. Leaving aside writing skill and style, it's very hard to write a long vignette that really holds an audience's attention. Pay close attention to effect you want to have on your readers!
Thanks again for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Contest! Looking forward to a strong plot in your next production!
SOCA (formerly a human named Kenn) is tasked with killing the president for "The Men in Black." But the president's security was a little more prepared than expected.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
You provide a vivid vision of an attempted assasination, told with character. The writing is generally clean and the style appropriate to the story.
What Might Be Improved
My most immediate criticisms of this piece are somewhat cliched: don't dump information that doesn't directly relate to the plot or character interplay, and remember to show, not tell. You describe an impression of the president's character, what effect he likes to have, not how he looked to the audience (or the viewpoint character). The description of SOCA too was an information dump. It did provide an important opportunity to explain his motivations, but it wasn't clear to me why a soulless person would suicide to protect his masters. It might make sense that life in captivity would be unbearable, but the paragraph doesn't actually make clear that he believed captivity was inevitable - only that failing the mission was.
Thanks again for your entry in thr Science Fictoin Short Story Contest! Looking forward to your next story!
The description of the president was not long, but felt a bit like an information dump.
Sally returns from the grave to speak to her husband through an AI chatbot - or does she?
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
One of the more common suggestions from Silicon Valley Transhumanists (such as Kurzweil) is that the path to immortality is to download oneself into an AI replica. Common in this group is the suggestion that AI replicas can be generated based on information about a person, even after they have died - and that regardless of whether such entities are truly conscious, they can be a commfort to those who have lost loved ones in flesh and blood.
This short story provokes the reader with the related concept of whether a ghost can enter a machine, merging spirit with an AI replica. It also brings up the very relevant point that there will certainly be entities with financial incentives to convince humans that the bots are sentient, and attempt to profit from the deception.
What Might Be Improved:
I personally did not prefer the word choice associated with Sally's affectionate language, including examples such as "Fluffy Fun Pot." However, these aesthetic choices can be very individual. To me they feel crass and unrealistic, but I could easily see how from another perspective they'd be deliverately fun and irreverent. So feel free to task my perspective here or leave it, but I'd ask around, as that kind of aesthetic signaling can be surprisingly powerful in attracting or repelling different audiences.
The "hook" in this story is Jack and Sally's relationship. If Sally is real, the relationship can be preserved, and at least some of his desparate loneliness assuaged. If not, it represents a deep and cynical betrayal by some nameless actor looking for a buck, one that threatens to poison Jack's memory of his beloved. To increase the emotional power of this story, you could work to better sell Jack's connection, Sally's love, his own desperation, and the depth of the non-physical aspects of their love. These things are implied, but not really shown. You've got a good start, but I could imagine this being reworked with no change to the plot to really hit the reader hard.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story, and Congratulations on being this month's winner!
Captain Jag and his crew scavenge a replacement ship from an old Titan colony.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest! Sorry for the long-delayed review: I've been dealing with some things and shirked my responsibilities here.
What I liked:
A group of drifters making their living off the scraps of a lost species of aliens provides an interesting setting for science fiction. The humans aren't able to provide to Research enough data to answer what's going, but they do manage to keep flying - for now. The protagonists of this story and their struggle to replace their ship provide an in-the-moment conflcit that allows the mystery of the Titans to be discussed.
What Might Be Improved:
While I like the idea of a forground conflict set against a background mystery, I don't find that conflict as gripping as I might. The loss of a crewman and the fear of being stranded in a deadly Titan colony ought to provide a sense of fear, a sense that the stakes are high for the crew, but for me they don't. For all the captain's urgency, I get a sense that the scavenging mission is just another day at the office for a people living in a desparation that the reader only barely glimpses. Strong characterization and amplification of the stakes of the current conflict could make this story much more powerful. This is the kind of story I could see forming the basis of a book, for which this piece could be a prologue or an excerpt - but it would be nice to see a bit more attention to selling the drama of the moment in terms of the characters and stakes involved.
Thanks again for your entry in the SCience Fiction Short Story Contest, and Congratulations on winning this round of the Contest!
Voranda and others invesigate the source of decay destroying Thanius: a Deathbringer.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest! My apologies for the long wait for the review: I've had lots going on personally that has been a bit difficult.
What I Liked:
The idea of a nearly invincible alien predator who is somehow able to reverse the technology used to attack it is a good, scary science fiction concept.
What Might Be Improved:
Uncharacteristically, I noted a number of grammar and capitalization errors in this piece - those might be worth fixing. Additionally, the general wording and presentation is weak and inconsistent, and does not do justice to the underlying plot ideas. Some paragraphs are reasonably well-written, but overall this remains an area worthy of focus.
Thanks again for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest, and for your efforts in bringing new plots to life!
Zhang is selected by the CCP to develop supersoldiers for his regime - at ruinous human cost. His conscience burdened by what he's brought into the world, Zhang embarks on a suicidal mission to remove his creation from the world - at least, for a while.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
This story is well-formed: it has visible stakes, a flawed protagonist, a progression toward a conflict, and is resolved through a difficult choice paid for by the life of the protagonist. Solid descriptions and well-placed background action add to the piece.
What might be improved:
Here I want to caution that my reactions are tempered by some familiarity with your writing, such that elements other might be happy with have become a bit more irritating with repetition, so please take this feedback with a grain of salt.
Despite Zhang's rebellion of conscience, the Chinese institutions in this piece come across as flat, cardboard cutout villains. In that context, Zhang's dialogue with Communist Party Officials and the naarative about its more dispensible "citizens" comes across as on-the-nose. Meanwhile, it seems there are no other players in the world other than Zhang and the Chinese Party. He doesn't seem to think about defection or escape in order to balance out the effects of his creation (surely less immediately threating than, say, the atom bomb) - just an attempt to destroy Pandora's Box of human genetic enhancement - even though it's already been opened. I wonder if America, Russia, or both of the Koreas have already begun their own programs by this time? It's a very interesting premise, but I do have to wonder a bit more where it all would lead. For this reason, I feel there's a good bit of unfulfilled potential here.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest and for a thoughtr-provoking piece!
A Monsignor in a fallen and sinful age hopes to bring about the return of his savior, but his apparently faithful assistant has more sinister plans.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
You offer in this piece distinct characters fulfilling distinct and conflicting roles, working to bring about a change in the world - but the type of change which will finally be wrought is revealed only in the end, through a twist. While sthis story is more religious in nature than scientific, it is always good to see the interplay between human desires and the technologies (such as cloning) that could bring them to light, as well as seeing proper respect given to the technical difficulties (such as verification and contamination) that characters in this situation might encounter. The conflict and progression in this story are well-developed here.
What Might Be Improved
There's not much time in this story given to personal chracter development, context, or description of the setting, though you attempt to address this somewhat by dialogue with characters who act in narrow roles. Using multiple scenes with disposable characters is a fine device for slightly longer fiction, but tends to weaken stories this short. You don't have much time to set up a conflict and make your point: the more characters and settings you introduce, the less justice you can do to each. Readers who gain a sense of immersion through concrete details are less likely to be drawn in, as are readers who have to work through the piece a couple of times to figure out which characters are trying to do what - the context switching costs associated with scene-switching should not be underestimated by a writer.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest and for a fun piece of writitng!
A lab assistant saves a universe from causual extermination.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
Many ideas have been popularized about where our universe came from and what its Creator might be like. Some favor Deism, figuring that the rules and matter of which our universe consists is selected from the narrow range of possible components and constants that might result in our being here to notice it. Others beleive in an originating spirit - perhaps anthropomorhpic, perhaps not. Others think we exist in a simulation - perhaps one within a vast stack of simulations, like Russian nesting dolls. And some speculate that we exist in someone's lab - or as in the movie "Men in Black," are held within a container collecting dust within an intergaliactic bus station.
This short story riffs off of these, imaginging a lab assistant who was witnessed the birth of life within an experiment meant to display the origins of matter creation in other dimensions. An assistant who approaches the event with a conscience and is willing to pay a price for that. This assistant acts as a narrator, explaining his choice after the fact to save a world full of innocents from causual extermination - a device that works well.
What Might Be Improved
Science fiction short stories are short stories first, and scientific second. They're mostly about connecting the world of ideas with human characters and emotion, making them more accessible. Perspective, tone, character, and word choice should be selected to highlight the subjects of the story in a way that achieves the desired emotional effect.
The tone in this story is mild melancholy, as the narrator reflects on what to him or her (we know very little about the only two characters in this story) are really the only possible choices that could have been made after the initial discovery is revealed. That is, there is little conflict here, little juxtaposition of interests, and while a universe was at stake, the lives and characters within it are fully hypothetical and so difficult to personally identify with. There are only a few ideas here and little personal interaction (or emotional reaction) with them on the part of the characters. Would telling the story from the perspective of the lab asistant in the middle of the events be more exciting? Would introducing more character and personality immerse the reader in these events, making the stake more real? Would a lab aisstant who still felt hunted and haunted make a more sympathetic narrator?
There's room to take this basic idea and make a lot more out of it, even in the cramped space of 2000 words!
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest! Hope to continue to see your thoughts come to life on the page!
In a world filled with superheroes, Jerome shows how special he is!
Thanks for your entry in BlackAdder's Cantina!
While your story fits more in the realm of fantasy than Space Opera, it otherwise fits the prmopt requirements, so I'll allow it - and I definitely enjoyed the entry! This story puts a spin on the typical superhero genre, with many potential heroes competing to protect a relative few normies from non-existent villains. While it brings to my mind Sanderson's Reckoners series, Piers Anthony's Xanth series, a number of made-for-TV series, and makes allusions to The Incredibles, this story stands on its own.
This piece follows (using a third-person limited perspective) one Jerome, a likeable characters whose relevant backstory is revealed during the dialogue in a way that effectively forwards the plot. While the story doesn't revolve around a strong climactic action on part of the protagonist, the information revealed performs a similar function, making this an entertaining read - and this contest's Winner!
Congratulations and thanks for swinigng by BlackAdder's Cantina!
Kattuel uses a machine to boost Jazon's growth in the hopes of finding a way to compete with giants - but was this a fatal mistake?
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I Liked:
This is the kind of plot I've come to enjoy from you: seemingly straightforward, but well-planned and leading to a dark twist. While it would be nice to have a little more to distinguish the characters, they were made memorable by their roles, and by Jazon's acceptance of his sacrificial role.
What Might Be Improved:
I would like to see a little more color in the characters you offer, and for the narrative and dialogue to be less on-the-nose. Still, with some work on the story-telling aspects, this could be a very strong story.
Thanks for your Entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest, and thanks for your patience in waiting for the review!
A sentient forest conquers a great land, but falls in time to newcomers and evoultion continues.
What I liked:
I was very pleased to see an original story written from the perspective of a network of trees. It's very difficult to write a story that spans eons, but a semi-immortal being such as an intelligent forest can plausibly do it without breaking character. It' been a long time since I've read science fiction from such a perspective, and it's refreshing.
What Might Be Improved:
While this is a clever and coherent story, it doesn't have a choice-driven plot. Rather, in keeping with the fatalistic tone, the forest doesn't give the impression that it's sentience allowed it to make any choices, correct or incorrect. Failing to adapt was not a source of regret for the trees, because the reader is not given a sense they every had a choice either way - and what is sentience without choice?
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction SHort Story Contest, and Congratulations on winning this month's contest!
The Chavez family gets a first-row seat in the diaspora from Earth to the stars.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
A great deal of thought clearly went into your planning of humanity's expansion: the story of these worlds is clever and detailed for a 2000 word short story, and using one family as a viewport into it seems like a good choice.
What Might Be Improved:
Unfortunately, it's difficult to tell a story on the scale of centuries in a couple of thousand words. In that word budget, a writer typically has to choose between painting a picture of the passage of centuries and telling a story - it's very difficult to have both, and the Science Fiction Short Story Contest is about stories. Additionally, the vision of a US-led interstellar future with China and Russia playing the backward, evil heavies of the piece seems a tad trite: a key rule of high-quality fiction is to make villains interesting and relatable. Still, much of what you've accomplished here is imaginitive and impressive - thanks for putting in the time for the contest and for your readers!
Thanks again for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
In a world of near-constant rain, several characters work to build an agrarian life.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest!
What I liked:
I enjoyed your dialgoue this time: I don't know if you spent more time on editing and character development, but it read more naturally than in the previous month's story. The concerns of your characters and the way they were expressed added life and color to your writing.
What Might Be Improved:
While you are still growing as a writer, I can usually count on your works to contain a solid progress and story structure, including a plot twist. Unfortunately, I couldn't quite figure out where you were going this time, even if the road was better paved.
Thanks for your entry in the Science Fiction Short Story Contest! And your patience.
Printed from https://writing.com/main/profile/reviews/blackadder256
All Writing.Com images are copyrighted and may not be copied / modified in any way. All other brand names & trademarks are owned by their respective companies.
Generated in 0.12 seconds at 8:06am on Feb 21, 2025 via server WEBX1.
View Portfolio
Visit Notebook
Send Gift Points
Awards
Badges
Send Email
Community Newsfeed
General Discussion
Sponsored Items
Book of Trinkets
Static Items
Books
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
