How I Review!

I'm Thereviewgirl so, I thought it would be a good idea to give you a basic description of how and what I review. First I would like to talk about the rating system.


5.0- WOW if you can write a 5.0 you are amazing I would say, on an approximate, out of 1,000 items I might give one a 5.0. This piece must contain:

*Must have no spelling errors or mechanical errors.

*Must be appealing to the public.

*Must have all story elements exposition, rising action, climax, resolution. Exceptions are made for poems and other items to that nature.

*Must use imagery and writing techniques examples: metaphors, similes, personification, etc.

*Must be well written Have character folks Writing isn't all about grammer

4.5 to 4.0- Piece was excellent I give a lot more of these ratings than 5.0's
mechanical errors
*Has very few mechanical errors. 1-5 depending on length.

* Has used most story elements: exposition, rising action, climax, resolution. Exceptions are made for poems and other items to that nature.

*Appeals to most people

*Has minimal character

3.5 to 3.0-The piece was so-so. It was average and pretty common. BUT it had many strong points.

*Has few mechanical errors. 5-10 depending on length.

*Has used few story elements: exposition, rising action, climax, resolution. Exceptions are made for poems and other items to that nature.

*Appeals to most people

*Has some character.


2.5 to 2.0-This piece was below average and could be improved.

*Has a lot of mechanical errors. 10-15 depending on length.

*Has used very few story elements: exposition, rising action, climax, resolution. Exceptions are made for poems and other items to that nature.

*Appeals to a very small crowd

*Has no character

1.5 to1.0-This piece was pretty bad. It needed improvement in several areas.

*Uses no techniques used in demonstrated in 5.0 to 2.0


Next, When I review I usually start with addressing you and giving you a couple of positives on the piece. Then I move on to a couple of things that could be improved. Here is am example. Names have been changed

Jane,

The poem had a provoking thought while, some of your phrases didn't make to much sense. "As I found stuff to a plethora was waiting.”
That confused me. The words in to should be combined. I liked it a lot, the story was really excellent! Write On!

TheReviewGirl.


That is usually how they go, sometimes into more detail sometimes a little less depending on the rating I gave you. I hope this gave you a picture about me and I’ll review you soon!

Thereviewgirl20