In my opinion, art occurs when a person succeeds in transmitting a deeply felt emotion clearly in words, graphics, sounds or acting. Many of us talk about art, but few of us are able to use our skills to transmit true feelings.
It takes practice to become adept at conveying complex, deeply-felt emotions. Ironically, we’re pretty good at it as children, but we learn to repress our feelings and communicate them indirectly as we grow up. I think that artists tend to see the world with childlike wonder and curiosity, and have not learned to hold it all at arm’s length. -- Jessiebelle
Long apparently has a very narrow-minded view of art, which is the antithesis of what art is. The form it takes is unimportant. Art is an expression of the creative soul, regardless of how it manifests itself.
I think Long is just frustrated and trying to stir up trouble. -- Jessiebelle
I think the toughest part in this situation is that you can't hold back any emotion or feeling because that is what creates and makes your art of creative writing.
That’s only tough if you want to hold back. -- Jessiebelle
I wonder if someone could give me a clear definition of time i.e. past, present, future tense.. how to identify it ...I find myself writing in what others recognise as 'mixed tense' but I am unable to 'see it.' M.DeVille'
Hmmm. I think maybe your question’s deeper than a mere confusion of past, present, and future tense.
Past = I rode my bike yesterday.
Present = I ride my bike and feel the wind in my hair. I think about this weighty question of verb tense, and I begin to get a headache.
Future = I will ride my bike clear across Texas before I figure out how to explain this confusion of tenses…
Are you having difficulty with shifting tenses? Perhaps you are using flashbacks, and having trouble with transitions between past and present? An example or a bit more detail might be helpful. -- Jessiebelle
Thanks for that helpful piece on writing dialogue. It is something I struggle with very much. Having a few good guidelines set out like that will help me to focus on what I am doing.
Finnley.
Great! I’m glad I could help. -- Jessiebelle
I think a story without little to no dialog is flat. Dialog can show a great deal about a character. One thing I have noticed is that in well paced character driven stories they don't just tag lines of dialog with "he/she said," the tags moves the story along in someway. Sometimes as bit of description. or its action. A little of this can go along way is telling a good story.
I agree. People talk. A good storyteller shows them talking and doesn’t just recount what was said. -- Jessiebelle
Art is in the decision making process. Once you are able to control the result you create, you are an artist; doubly so if you art is driven by "beauty" or similar abstract vision.
Of course, this might well mean that there are artists in every field of endeavor.
Art is the essence of humanity; however this is no reason which we cannot see a spark of spirit in the other animals.
I think of art as an act of creation; not mere replication. As such, yes, I think there are artists in just about every field of endeavor. If an animal simply lifts a paintbrush and splashes paint on canvas in order to earn a reward, is it art? Perhaps not. But once the idea has been taught, if that animal ever shows an interest in painting and does it for the sheer pleasure of doing it, then I think we do see a spark of that creative spirit there. -- Jessiebelle
Dear Jessiebelle,
I learnt much from your newsletter but was rather frustrated not to find any hint at what I think is the laboratory of writing dynamics in dialogue. You have singled out the notion of character and expanded from that. Hence your caution at avoiding "idle chit-chat".
Would you not agree that the actual locus that generates the power of any dialogue is the field of the readers mind where the speech of two ("dia"-logue) characters are put in presence? If we oversee this point, then we are stuck in the narcissism of monologue (also useful at times, even in the presence of other characters).
I am sure there are cases of "idle chit-chat" between characters which, considered separately, are boring, but which, when the reader's mind lets itself be drawn into the game of confronting both, generate the interest.
Alec Numa
I think what you’re getting at is the elements of dialogue that make it sound natural, not stilted or contrived. I wouldn’t call that “idle chit-chat,” necessarily. What I think of as idle is an entirely mundane conversation leading the story nowhere. Detailing not only what the character had for breakfast, but what color plate it was served on. You know what I mean? You can work in the ordinary chatter in such a way that it illustrates something about the character or advances the plot, but you don’t need to take six pages to do it. The ultimate question is, is it really relevant to something in the story? -- Jessiebelle
Conversations...
A few things you didn't say.
( There are NO dbl. spaces in a conversation; unless the subject or scene changes ) Pick up a book..any book..dbl-sp is for paragraphs.
'yuck'..tag lines he said/she said...
names...unless there are more than two, names are NOT necessary...if more than two, tell the reader 'before'...not in a tag-line after..also let the reader 'know' how it is being said.
(Ted glaired at the others and shouted, ".....)
just bob
Well, first of all… you do break the paragraphs when a new speaker starts speaking. Second, there’s nothing inherently wrong with “he said” and “she said” - I see so many arguments from both camps (the ones who think you should use no tags at all, or stick almost exclusively to “he said” and “she said,” versus those who think you should always “spice up” your dialogue with more creative tags). Personally, I think you should use whatever works best at the time; that’s up to you, as the writer. But avoid creating improbable or impossible scenarios with overly creative tags and verbs. It’s hard to “yawn” a line of dialogue, for instance. I don’t necessarily agree that you have to let the reader know who’s speaking before the words of dialogue, unless the speaker’s about to launch into several paragraphs of monologue. “Okay,” said Ted, glaring at the others, ought to work just fine. But I do get your point - it can be annoying to have to thumb through the pages or count paragraphs to figure out who said what. -- Jessiebelle
You've written an excellent article on dialogue. It was good to "bone up" on it.
Thanks! -- Jessiebelle
that was an interesting newsletter. I have a question though. You said that when a character talks you use "and". I use 'and'. Is this ok or is it wrong?
Ahh, good point - I did write that with a bit of a US slant, didn’t I? In the UK, the convention is to reverse the use of single and double quotation marks from that of the US, but you still need to be absolutely consistent about it. -- Jessiebelle
Digital photography not art?! I'd love to put together some grand dissertation refuting the point, but I'm just sitting here with my mouth agape...not very helpful for the cause. I have this feeling that if I started to make my case I wouldn't shut up for far too long. So, I'll just state, "Yes, it is." There! I said it!
That was my first reaction. My second was to rant. (I used to work with a graphic artist who once remarked that the writers in the department “weren’t creative.” That got my hackles up, but then again, she was referring to technical writers…) My third was to write a rebuttal. That’s what we creative tech writers do when we’re outraged. -- Jessiebelle
Great newsletters - the best!
A last word on titles. I gave a title to a story in a series but didn't use it then. When I came back a few months later, the title inspired me to write a different story to any I'd written before. Do have a look at:
| | Invalid Item This item number is not valid. #1147752 by Not Available. |
That’s a powerful, well-written, disturbing, but hopeful story you’ve got there. It fits in well with this week’s theme, as well - some of the descriptive passages are quite vivid. -- Jessiebelle
I tend to be a very shy person and that trait flows into my attempts at writing. I found your Newsletter in my mailbox, and was delighted to find the issue's topic on dialogue. I found your first two bullet points very helpful. Thank you for presenting such an articulate and useful guide. I have saved this for future reference.
You’re welcome! It’s funny; I’m much less shy in writing than I am in person. Try writing a character who is very different from you - very outgoing, perhaps to the point of being a little outrageous. Use description and dialogue and really have some fun with it. Act it out on paper. What happens? What’s the worst that could happen? I’ve found that the more outgoing I am with my writing, the more outgoing I become in person. -- Jessiebelle
Hi, Jessiebelle!
I was so glad to recieve another of your newsletters!
While the former one made me laugh and gave me ideas of how to name songs, this one came right on time because I've just found out that I can post images here on WDC, and since I'm not only writing songs but also love to paint, I've posted a drawing of mine right away, you can check it out if you want...
The fact that there are elephants who draw was new to me, and I like the idea very much! It's special...
Write on! You give wonderful ideas!
Dana.
Yes, indeed - why should we humans have all the fun? I took a look at your painting. I had to smile at the note - good to see that you tried something new at your mom’s suggestion. I think it turned out quite well! Thank you, Dana. -- Jessiebelle
|