![]() ![]() |
![]() | Deep Sea Diver ![]() It's a very short one about a pondering diver in his blue depths ![]() |
Hello, I found your work while browsing the read & review section and would like to take a few minutes to share my thoughts with you. I noticed your account is 1 day old. Let me first say, welcome to writing.com! I hope you find this community as supportive and helpful as I have over these many years. I'd like to first preface this review by letting you know that I take a pretty in-depth approach to the reviewing process. As such, the comments I write may be viewed as someone with a negative opinion of your work. Please keep in mind that is not the case. I only point out what I think might require some attention, none of what I say is meant to be negative or mean-spirited. I'd also like to say that sometimes in my reviews, you may see a word with a dotted underline like this. This is an area of a sentence that I've marked for your attention. I've packed a comment in the notes that you can read by simply mousing over the word with a dotted underline. I hope that makes sense, I'm not good at explaining things. With that out of the way let's get to the review. *** Opening *** I'm generally not a fan of the massive, long-winded sentences in some openers. I'm more partial to the short and sweet tone setters: A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens ▼ Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury ▼ But what you've got works. I like it. It's a bit of a flex in terms of your grammatical ability but hey, nothing wrong with that. I would like to say however, it could do with a few less words. ![]() That's a whammer of a sentence! 36 words. Scriptura Gigas! I like what the sentence does though. I like the mood you're setting but some of this could be packed a little tighter while still making the same point. ![]() It's only minor, but removing just a few words can arrive at the same point. Personally, and I'm in the minority, I don't mind big sentences, but there's a desire in modern literature to 'get on with it.' Just a caution. *** Style and Voice *** ![]() I mentioned above that your opening is pretty enormous. While I like the mood, I think the entire clockwork of the imagination could be better oiled with a different structuring and a removal of the gerund phrase and passive voicing. Taking into account the suggested structure above I'd offer this stylistic suggestion: ![]() This makes the point a little more direct by simply removing the gerund phrase, which contributes a bit of a dull undertone to the sentence. It also delivers your opener quicker with the first sentence. Now again, that's up to you, I think what you have is solid. Just stylistically I think sometimes less is more. This is however, your writing, if you like it, then so be it. You're after all the artist here. These are only suggestions. ![]() I don't really know why, but this is a really good shock to the system while I'm reading. Nice. ![]() It's a nice sentence but a little wordy, though there's a dogmatic view to adverbs being somewhat of a literary pariah, I think sometimes they do a splendid job (not often though) ![]() This takes out the wordiness and accomplishes the same delivery. Just be careful with adverbs, 9 times out of 10, there's a better word, but that 1 time in 10, its the perfect word. *** Grammar *** Confronted with depths the heart tends to... *** Typos *** ![]() Not sure how you wanted to word this, but either that feels or that is is probably what you meant to type? ![]() ![]() *** Ending *** Definitely not how I saw the end coming. I liked it. Another good shock to the system. *** Summary *** This was a splendid piece of artwork! Markedly reminiscent of the transcendentalism movement in the early and mid 1800s. Existential and serene through its entirety. I found myself sinking into a comfortable abyss while reading this. Emotionally this does a magnificent job at captivating the reader. It hits similar in its presentation to the literary greats of that time like Ralph Waldo Emerson and Walt Whitman. I would say, there's a lot of repetitive words that some might find distracting, but the more I read the more I started to believe that this was a deliberate style choice of the author, and in my opinion, it worked well. This is lovely writing. Maybe a little philosophical for some, but for me, this is my cup of tea, and you did a magnificent job! Thank you for sharing it, and I hope to see more of you work. Welcome again to writing.com! I'll be watching for you. ![]() ![]()
|