Non-Technical Support Forum

Greets,

Unfortunately, I'm not in a position to police content that may or may not be written by AI. Folks who run contests may want to have their own rules, made with care and caution, about how they plan to determine if a piece is AI generated. That would include what amount of "flagging" constitutes AI written content -- for example, Grammarly, Word and other grammar assistants/word suggesters often get flagged as "AI". One of the key detectors in AI detection is proper grammar and sentence structure -- which humans often don't use correctly without the assistance of a grammar assistant. (No AI is going to use my patented "--" or use as many "..." as I do. )

For what it's worth... (<--- dot dot dot) I've done some testing with AI checkers and found in my samples that a 16 line 100% AI written poem passed as 0% AI content ... While randomly sampled older writings (pre-AI) flagged as 70%+ AI written. Outside of the currently unreliable state of "AI detectors", it's of note that we're less than 2 years into the AI content generation era. Each year that passes, it will be harder and harder for any system to detect it. The goal of the AI content generators is, of course, to look as human as possible. They'll keep improving until they are impossible to reliably detect. IMHO, most of these detectors are stopgap measures that will have a hard time keeping up.

And that all comes back to my initial premise:
I'm just not in a position to be able to police this type of content creation and anyone trying to do so for their contests or events needs to have very clear rules about how they'll determine if content is AI generated, what percent has to get flagged to be disqualified, etc etc.

Best wishes,
~~SM

FORUM

Technical Support Forum  (13+) Members help other members with technical questions and problems using Writing.Com! #303715 by Writing.Com Support