This is a continuation of my blogging here at WdC |
This will be a blog for my writing, maybe with (too much) personal thrown in. I am hoping it will be a little more interactive, with me answering questions, helping out and whatnot. If it falls this year (2024), then I may stop the whole blogging thing, but that's all a "wait and see" scenario. An index of topics can be found here: "Writing Blog No.2 Index" Feel free to comment and interact. |
The Problems With Technology (In Stories) This is NOT about technology you might use to assist your writing. I will not be slagging off AI in all its myriad forms here, as much as it deserves it. Yes, I know it is a tool, but it steals and gives no recompenseā¦ and then people pay for a programme like Grammarly that gets grammar wrong, and yet because people rely on it, they do not bother to learn the rules for themselves and so donāt realise Grammarly is (essentially) useless for a fiction writer. [/rant] No, this is about utilising the technology f the time in a story. This came up in a conversation on Discord recently. Hereās the context: When we read a story from the 1970s through 1990s, most of the time it does not matter the year. Car models might be named, maybe a famous person or scandal, stuff like that, but rarely did people use things like computers and the old-styled technology was still in use. More to the point, those technologies are still used in a lot of cases today. For those years, stories became timeless. But now, if we mention a technology, there is a chance that in 5 years many people are not going to know what we meanā¦ or using the technology makes little sense. The examples we came up with were PDAs (personal digital assistants) and car-phones. We also looked at some technologies that might become obsolete, like autonomous cars and photocopiers. But that was our discussion. So, the point of this is ā how much technology should you include in a story? Now, too much technology of the time could well date a story, and leave future readers confused. Not enough technology could make a story seem unrealistic. It is a fine balancing act, and is becoming harder and harder as things evolve and develop. So, this is my opinion: use generic terms. Donāt talk about your Apple iPhone 17B; talk about your SmartPhone. I canāt see SmartPhones of all stripes disappearing in the foreseeable future, so thatās safe. Donāt talk about an iPad, just a Tablet or Tablet Computer. I am sure you can think of other examples. This leads to another aspect of this ā computer programmes and applications (āappsā). If I talked about Napster in a story, or even MySpace, people under a certain age would be all, āWhat? Okay, boomer!ā (Iām actually Gen-X, not a boomer, but thatās by the by.) Even talking Pirate Bay and Tout (sticking with downloads and social media) would confuse many. Then, letās go to functional programmes: WordPerfect and MS Works. Who remembers them? We nearly all use Word/Office (or free variations) at the moment. Butā¦ Word is also killing itself with its subscription model, and other alternatives (Open office) are coming to the fore, so would Word even be there in 10 years? So, again, using generic terms will make sure your story isnāt dated. Pirate sites, social media, word processing programmes ā generic terms. Now! Having said all that, if you want your story to be set in a particular year or year period (say, your story is an alternate history story about Boris Johnson losing his mind and talking only in Latin before losing his leadership to a lettuce dressed as Liz Truss), then these details can help add colour to your tale, and help immerse the reader into that particular time. But if the time period does not really matter, and you just want it to be vaguely ātodayā in time period, then maybe consider generics instead of exactitudes. In. My. Opinion. . |