![]() |
My primary Writing.com blog. |
*Written as part of the "30-Day Blogging Challenge ON HIATUS" ![]() Day 27 Prompt: Pick an article in the news that caught your attention over the weekend and tell us about it (or do a basic recap of the top news stories or bizarre stories of interest over the weekend). Fair warning: I'm a sucker for bizarre news stories. Random facts and trivia tend to stick with me and while my wife will just roll her eyes whenever I spout off something I heard or read that day, just remember that you did ask for this. ![]() I originally heard about this article on the Slate Political Gabfest podcast and it drew my attention to this USA Today article ![]() Why is this significant? Because current maple syrup harvesting relies on existing forests full of fully-grown maple trees. Harvesters can only get about 40-50 gallons of syrup from a square acre of natural forests at present, which is why all those "real maple syrup" varieties at the grocery store are $6 to $10 for a little teensy bottle. With this new development, though, saplings can be planted and harvested like other crops. And since they can be planted and cultivated like an orchard or a vineyard with a much shorter " wait time " for the trees to start producing sap, maple syrup producers may be able to produce as much as 4,000 gallons of syrup from the same square acre! ![]() ![]() Obviously not everyone is pleased; there's a woman quoted in that USA Today article who seems a bit displeased at the idea that just anyone could make maple syrup... but hey, if it means $2-$3 maple syrups from all over the country, I think "The Maple Revolution" (note to self: look into trademarking that...) could be an interesting time for all of us. ADDED BONUS: In addition to being a sucker for random news and bits of trivia, I'm also a sucker for a good click-through or related item, and I certainly wasn't disappointed because at the very bottom of that USA Today article, there was a link to this story ![]() ![]() |