%%USERNAME%%    %%ACCWORDS%% %%ONOFF%% |
 |    Not for the faint of art. |
| A Guardian article from earlier this year promotes a "radical" idea. Or, as I call it, eating. ‘Intuitive eating’ is an anti-diet that helps reconnect us to internal cues. But how does it work? Well, first of all, if it's intuitive, then you don't need rambling "how does it work" articles, now, do you? Figuring out what to eat is complicated. What are you in the mood for? What do other people in your household want? What can you afford? What do you have time to prepare? Wow. If that's complicated, I hope you never have to be a writer working on a deadline. Oh, wait. Add the ambient pressure of a culture that loudly celebrates certain foods, bodies and lifestyles as desirable while vilifying others, and the simple question of what to have for dinner becomes fraught. Oh, but it's even worse than that when you add in vegans, gluten-avoiders, the allergic and the "allergic," religious restrictions, etc. Recently, there has been renewed interest in an approach called “intuitive eating”, based on the idea that your body already knows exactly what it needs. Yes, it absolutely does, and apparently, it "needs" to be overweight. Apparently, though, that's an expected result of intuitive eating. Just try telling that to my doctor. She recommends people ask themselves questions like: what does it mean for me to feel healthy? Am I taking into consideration my mental health, emotional health and relational health? Which of my beliefs come from accurate, scientific information – and which come from movies, TV shows or ads in magazines? Well, I'm not going to argue with this. It parallels my feelings about drinking. Given how emotional this work can be, experts recommend working with a professional when possible. Again... this kind of nullifies the "intuitive" part. Giving yourself permission to eat what you want may involve wrestling with how your culture’s foods might have been villainized by mainstream, white American culture, Johnson explains. Oh, give me a fucking break. I get that it's fashionable to turn mainstream white American culture into the Bad Guy, but how about doing it by ragging on deep-fried butter with mayonnaise, or whatever culinary abomination came out of some Midwestern state fair this year? Also not mentioned: the overwhelming amount of privilege it takes to "eat what you want." You think our distant, or even not-so-distant, ancestors were able to put together a shopping list or order from Instacart, like I do? No, they hunted or gathered whatever was available that week, or, later, were mostly restricted to plants and animals suited for domestication. Eating what you want is largely an industrial-age possibility, a product of privilege, and this includes veganism or gluten avoidance. My point being that, as much as I distrust unsupported evolutionary arguments, I don't think we evolved to eat what we want, but to eat what was available, and sometimes, there wasn't a lot of that. On the other hoof, a lot of people back then didn't live very long, so it's hardly an ideal to strive for. |
View Portfolio
Visit Notebook
Send Gift Points
Awards
Badges
Send Email
Community Newsfeed
General Discussion
Sponsored Items
Book of Trinkets
Static Items
Books
Groups
Interactive Stories
Audio
Campfire Creatives
Community Notes
Crossword Puzzles
Documents
Folders
Images
In & Outs
Madlibs
Photo Albums
Polls
Product Reviews
Quizzes
Survey Forms
Web Pages
Word Searches
