GROUP

The Iron Bank of Braavos  (13+) For G.o.T. Activity #1994693 by Creeper Of The Realm

"Game of Thrones"  Hello fellow writer! My name is Sandra. I am one of the sly foxes. Title: Harder To Believe And Even Harder To ProveFirst Impression: So, you chose to present the infamous mystery solving duo, Holmes and Watson with yet another case to solve. Very bold of you, yet well constructed despite the tight word constraints. That simple all be it intriguing sentence in the newspaper proved impossible for the gentlemen to ignore. They ran with the apparent challenge. Riddles or conundrums appeal, do they not? How does one prove seeing nothing? Seeing of course is the operative word. As Holmes states, "There's more than one way to 'see' a crime." This reminds me of people, children in particular, who reach for something while saying, "let me see it." Hands do not see in the traditional, literal sense as do blind people not 'see' with their eyes. What needs your attention: Is it "undoubtably" or "undoubtedly"? Is it a dialect thing? It reminds me of
indubitably. I am a tad confused. Who read over whose shoulder? This is well written, so I find no faults. What part I liked best: All of this swift-paced tale is amusing. From start to finish you portray the two crime aficionados brilliantly. They discover a challenge and they waste no time solving it. Ah, to live an existence in which one could be free to drop everything at a moment's notice just to solve a riddle. Holmes simply cannot accept that no one saw anything. Impossible. Preposterous. Overall Impression: Your response/offering to the given prompt is wonderful. Sherlock fans would appreciate it. Thank you for allowing me to read your work. It has been my pleasure! What does the fox say??? Listen carefully. (1789 characters) DISCLAIMER: The views and opinions on this review are mainly the things discovered by the reader and therefore, do not reflect necessarily to the group, activity and/or event being affiliated herein. This is only the opinion and suggestions of the reviewer and it is still up to the author of this piece to consider this review as a corrective action or otherwise.